Skip to main content

SB 54 Plastic Packaging Resources and Updates. Access Here.

Evaluating the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, A Federal Equivalent to PAGA? 

June 27, 2025

Evaluating the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, A Federal Equivalent to PAGA? 

On May 19, 2025, U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche introduced, via an internal memorandum, the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative (CRFI), representing a significant shift for the Department of Justice (DOJ) in enforcing federal civil rights laws. This initiative leverages the False Claims Act (FCA) to hold organizations that benefit from federal funds accountable for alleged violations of anti-discrimination laws. 

The DOJ is using its CRFI to incentivize the FCA as a means of combating alleged fraud against the federal government. Like California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), the FCA empowers both the government and private individuals to file lawsuits against entities that allegedly misrepresent compliance with federal laws while receiving federal funds. Known as “qui tam” claims, these lawsuits provide whistleblowers with significant incentivization, offering them up to 30% of recovered damages. Businesses found liable under the FCA face stringent penalties, including treble damages, which can prove financially devastating. 

Under the FCA, any organization that accepts federal funding must certify adherence to anti-discrimination laws. The CRFI specifically targets cases where entities allegedly knowingly fail to uphold these standards while falsely claiming compliance. Such violations include the operation of discriminatory practices or programs that exclude certain protected classes. Notably, this initiative underscores the ongoing scrutiny of federal contractors and grant recipients when it comes to diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. 

Employers receiving federal funds are the focus of this initiative-based compliance push, with the CRFI presenting both risks and safe-harbor opportunities for organizations seeking to maintain compliance with anti-discrimination standards. Below are two critical takeaways for employers: 

  • Conduct Comprehensive Policy Audits: To mitigate risks, employers receiving federal funds should conduct thorough audits of their policies, training programs, and workplace practices to ensure compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws (e.g., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). This type of audit involves assessing areas such as recruitment, promotions, and employee access to resources, ensuring that no protected class faces exclusion or disadvantage. Policy audits and policy reviews can significantly reduce an employer’s vulnerability to whistleblower claims under the FCA. 
  • Review Contracts and Certifications with Legal Counsel: Employers should consult with legal counsel to ensure that declarations of compliance with anti-discrimination laws associated with the receipt of federal funds are accurate and fully supported by their practices. Misrepresentation, whether intentional or inadvertent, can lead to severe financial and reputational consequences under the FCA. 

The CRFI marks a significant escalation in enforcement of the current Administration’s executive orders focusing on equity and inclusion within federally funded organizations. Impacted employers must act decisively to align with anti-discrimination laws, thereby minimizing exposure to FCA claims and fostering a workplace built on fairness and compliance. By prioritizing policy audits and contract reviews, organizations can navigate this complex legal landscape effectively lowering the risk of becoming involved in what has the potential to become an incentivized litigation trend.