Comment Period to Revise LGMA-Approved Guidelines Closes May 31, 2022

May 26th, 2022

Since the inception of the California and Arizona Leafy Greens Marketing Agreements (LGMAs), Western Growers (WG) has been at the forefront of revising the written “Commodity Specific Food Safety Guidelines for the Production and Harvest of Lettuce and Leafy Greens” for the industry in both states. These guidelines are known as the LGMA-approved guidelines.

On May 31, 2022, the comment period associated with revisions on Pre-harvest Product Testing in the LGMA-approved guidelines officially closes. Western Growers will host a web discussion to publicly present and discuss all proposed changes and comments received during the comment period. An email with additional webinar details and registration information will be sent out shortly.  

Stakeholders interested in submitting proposed revisions through this process can submit comments until May 31, 2022 at LeafyGreenGuidance.com.

Proposed changes must be submitted online and meet LGMA criteria to be considered. Proposals should be 1) comprehensive, 2) accompanied by a statement on how proposed changes will enhance food safety, and 3) include a clear and straightforward scientific basis or rationale, including citations of relevant research if available.

For additional information, contact WG’s Science department at [email protected].

Legislative Update: Card Check

May 13th, 2022

AB 2183 (Stone) is the latest attempt by the United Farm Workers to implement card check legislation in California. This bill was introduced early in 2022 despite the veto of the previous bill on this subject, AB 616 (Stone), by Governor Newsom last year. AB 2183 is currently in the Assembly Appropriations Committee and is likely to move to the Assembly Floor the week of May 23rd. WG has been very active in opposition to the bill. A copy of the most recent coalition opposition letter is attached as a reference. In addition, the prepared testimony to the Assembly Labor Committee by Matthew Allen, WG’s Vice President of State Government Affairs is included below.

“Good afternoon, Mr. Chair and members of the Committee.
I’m Matthew Allen with Western Growers Association. WG is strongly opposed to AB 2183. This bill is not about mail-in voting. Respectfully, it is the latest attempt to undermine the secret ballot election process as established by the Agricultural Labor Relations Act. The secret ballot serves as one of the core elements for the protection of a farmworker’s right to a free and uncoerced choice in deciding to vote either for or against union representation.  AB 2183 eliminates a farmworker’s right to a secret ballot election that is free from coercion from any party that has a financial interest in the outcome of the election. This was recognized by Governor Brown’s veto of SB 104 in 2011, Governor Schwarzenegger’s veto of SB 789 in 2009, and most recently by Governor Newsom’s veto of AB 616 just last year.

It is critical to note that when the Agricultural Labor Relations Act was created, UFW founder Cesar Chavez insisted that the Act ensure that secret ballot elections are to be the exclusive means for recognizing a union. This ensures that farmworkers may express a true preference on union representation without coercion from either their employer or from the union seeking to be their representative.

We are also opposed to the bonding requirement as outlined in the bill when appealing a monetary award order at the Agricultural Labor Relations Board. AB 2183 requires that this appeals bond be filed as a condition of having the right to appeal a decision of the Board. This violates basic due process because it essentially allows the Board to determine whether or not the employer can make an appeal. The ALRB is not a neutral party in this context and has a prejudicial interest in the outcome of the appeal. This language was also found in AB 561 in 2015. That bill was vetoed by Governor Brown.

Thank you for the opportunity to testify this afternoon.”

Card Check Bill AB 2183 Heads to California Assembly Floor

May 20th, 2022

AB 2183 (Stone) is the latest attempt by the United Farm Workers to implement card check legislation in California. The bill was voted out of the Assembly Appropriations Committee yesterday and is now on the Assembly Floor.

This bill was introduced early in 2022 despite the veto of the previous bill on this subject, AB 616 (Stone), by Governor Gavin Newsom last year. WG has been very active in opposition to the bill.

A copy of the most recent coalition opposition letter can be read at this link. In addition, the prepared testimony to the Assembly Labor Committee by Matthew Allen, WG’s Vice President of State Government Affairs is included below.

“Good afternoon Mr. Chair and members of the Committee.

I’m Matthew Allen with Western Growers Association. WG is strongly opposed to AB 2183. This bill is not about mail-in voting. Respectfully, it is the latest attempt to undermine the secret ballot election process as established by the Agricultural Labor Relations Act. The secret ballot serves as one of the core elements for the protection of a farmworker’s right to a free and uncoerced choice in deciding to vote either for or against union representation.  AB 2183 eliminates a farmworker’s right to a secret ballot election that is free from coercion from any party that has a financial interest in the outcome of the election. This was recognized by Governor Brown’s veto of SB 104 in 2011, Governor Schwarzenegger’s veto of SB 789 in 2009, and most recently by Governor Newsom’s veto of AB 616 just last year.

It is critical to note that when the Agricultural Labor Relations Act was created, UFW founder Cesar Chavez insisted that the Act ensure that secret ballot elections are to be the exclusive means for recognizing a union. This ensures that farmworkers may express a true preference on union representation without coercion from either their employer or from the union seeking to be their representative.

We are also opposed to the bonding requirement as outlined in the bill when appealing a monetary award order at the Agricultural Labor Relations Board. AB 2183 requires that this appeals bond be filed as a condition of having the right to appeal a decision of the Board. This violates basic due process because it essentially allows the Board to determine whether or not the employer can make an appeal. The ALRB is not a neutral party in this context and has a prejudicial interest in the outcome of the appeal. This language was also found in AB 561 in 2015. That bill was vetoed by Governor Brown.

Thank you for the opportunity to testify this afternoon.”

USDA Now Accepting Applications to Help Farmers Cover Costs of Organic Transition, Certification

May 20th, 2022

The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced this week that the application period is open for its Organic and Transitional Education and Certification Program (OTECP) and Organic Certification Cost Share Program (OCCSP).

Both programs are intended to help growers and handlers who are certified organic, as well as growers and handlers who are transitioning to organic production.

OTECP covers: 

  • Certification costs for organic producers and handlers (25 percent up to $250 per category)
  • Eligible expenses for transitional producers, including fees for pre-certification inspections and development of an organic system plan (75 percent up to $750)
  • Registration fees for educational events (75 percent up to $200)
  • Soil testing (75 percent up to $100)

Meanwhile, OCCSP covers 50 percent or up to $500 per category of certification costs. 

Producers have until Oct. 31, 2022 to file applications and should contact their local Farm Service Agency (FSA). More information can be found on USDA’s website.

Water Grab Legislation AB 2639 Defeated in California

May 31st, 2022

AB 2639, a bill that would have accelerated the adoption of the Bay-Delta Plan, was defeated in the California Assembly last week due to a coordinated effort of ag and water stakeholders working with key legislators.

The bill, authored by Assemblymember Bill Quirk (D-Hayward) additionally would have prohibited the State Water Board from issuing any new water rights permits, putting the Sites Reservoir project in danger.

“I appealed to my colleagues on a very personal level,” said Assemblymember Adam Gray (D-Merced). “There is no other region of the state that would be as heavily impacted by this bill as my district and the people I represent. I asked my colleagues to consider what they would ask of me if their districts were similarly targeted. I told the story of the decades-long fight my community has waged against the water grab, and how the State Water Board has decided that the impacts to our economy and our drinking water are ‘significant, but unavoidable.’ I asked them if the Assembly was prepared to make the same decision.”

Forty four members of the Assembly either abstained or voted no on the bill, denying it the 41 votes it needed to pass.

WHD: H-2A Meal Waivers Are Out of Control

May 6th, 2022

H-2A employers must offer and provide each H-2A worker three meals per day or provide the workers free and convenient cooking facilities. If an employer elects to provide the meals to the H-2A workers, it must provide three meals per day to each employee living in employer housing per day, every day, including Sundays.

Employers may deduct the cost of the meals up to a daily limit imposed by law – currently $14.00 per day – unless the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) approves a higher rate.

However, H-2A employees don’t always want to eat the employer provided meal or meals, especially on Sunday, instead preferring to eat out, or at a family member’s or friend’s home. They also don’t want to be charged for a meal they didn’t eat.

To address this issue, officials with DOL’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) informally suggested that H-2A employers have workers sign a meal waiver when they choose to not partake in the employer-provided meal.  Now, WHD says some employers have taken advantage of the guidance, to the point where all of the H-2A employees on the job order are waiving their rights to meals on Sundays, in contradiction of the regulations.

WHD is reminding employers that the suggestion of having a meal waiver was never intended to cover an entire workforce listed on an H-2A contract.  The regulations are clear that employers not providing kitchen facilities must provide three meals a day, seven days a week.  WHD’s suggestion to use the meal waiver was intended to apply when a small number of workers departed for the weekend and did not want to pay for meals they did not eat. The suggestion was for employers to document the fact that those employees voluntarily waived their meals. 

WHD now says it has become an industry practice for H-2A employers in the Western Region to not provide meals on Sundays, relying instead on blanket meal waivers.  WHD urges employers engaging in this practice to cease doing so, as enforcement on the issue is forthcoming. 

H-2A employers are reminded to provide three meals a day, seven days a week, as well as comply with all other H2A requirements and assurances – as WHD will be enforcing the standards strictly. 

For information about the H-2A program or Western Growers H-2A Services, please contact Western Growers.

Best Practices Part 2, Transfer of H-2A Workers

May 6th, 2022

As discussed in our previous newsletter “Best Practices: Part 1, Screening H-2A Applicants in the U.S.”, H-2A workers currently working in the U.S. may be seeking better options and start applying for a job directly to H-2A employers with higher AEWR.

As an H-2A employer, you may wonder if it’s possible to petition for them to work for you.

Best Practices 

Remember that first, you must ensure that you do not have rejected any qualified U.S. applicants who are able, willing, and available to perform the job listed in the H-2A job order. 

If you are willing to hire an H-2A worker who is currently working for another employer, the following criteria apply: 

  • The employer must know that the worker will be transferred to a new employer and must agree with it, as he will need to provide documentation to prove the current worker’s H-2A visa status. (e.g., Labor Certification and USCIS approval notice)
  • A transfer application will need to be filed with USCIS along with the corresponding fee.
  • Finally, only employers who are part of the E-verify program can put a transferred requested worker to work as soon as the petitioner employer receives the receipt of the transfer application; otherwise they must wait until the petition is approved by USCIS.
  • The new employer would be responsible as an employer for the worker’s outbound travel and subsistence, on the return to their place of origin.

If a transfer is not possible and the worker decides to abandon their job, they would have to return to their country of origin in the next 10 days. The worker will be able to be petitioned as a regular H-2A worker again.

The worker must remain outside of the U.S. for at least 3 months if they have been previously continuously hired under H-2A for a period of 3 years.

For questions about H-2A program compliance or Western Growers H-2A Services, please contact Jason Resnick ([email protected]).   

The President’s National Emergency

May 13th, 2022

Remember the timeframe extensions that were announced early in the pandemic? They are still in effect and—importantly—they were just extended. Here is what happened:

As you will recall, in May 2020, the Departments of Labor and Treasury issued the “Joint Notification of Extensions of Certain Timeframes for Employee Benefit Plans, Participants, and Beneficiaries Affected by the COVID-19 Outbreak” (Joint Notice). The Joint Notice gave participants and beneficiaries additional time to request a HIPAA special enrollment, elect COBRA, pay COBRA premiums (initial and monthly), notify the plan of a COBRA qualifying event or determination of disability, file a claim, or file a claim appeal. This extension occurred because plans were instructed to disregard the “Outbreak Period” when calculating deadlines—and the “Outbreak Period” started as early as March 1, 2020, and runs for 60 days after the end of the President’s declared National Emergency. Importantly, in February 2021, the DOL issued supplemental guidance (“Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) Disaster Relief Notice 2021-01”), which explained that there is an outside limit of one year on the timeframe extensions. 

It is also important to note that, although we do not hear about them much these days, the timeframe extensions are still in effect. The extensions are tied to the President’s declaration of a National Emergency. President Trump declared a National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak (National Emergency), effective March 1, 2020. On February 24, 2021, President Biden extended the original declaration of National Emergency. Under the authority of the governing statute, that declaration would have ended on March 1, 2022, but on February 23rd President Biden extended the National Emergency again. It will now expire on March 1, 2023, unless ended earlier. Therefore, until an applicable Outbreak Period runs its course, participants and beneficiaries will continue to have additional time to elect COBRA, pay COBRA premiums, and take other actions as permitted by the Joint Notice. 

Authored by: Marilyn Monahan, Esq. Monahan Law Office. Reprinted with permission.

California Supreme Court Rules Missed Meal Break Pay are “Wages”

May 27th, 2022

The California Supreme Court ruled on May 23rd, that premiums paid to employees who are unable to take a full and timely meal or rest period are considered “wages.”

California law requires employers to provide daily meal and rest breaks to most unsalaried employees. If an employee is unable to take a full and timely meal or rest period, the employer must pay the employee a “premium” consisting of an additional hour of pay. The issues before the Court were: (1) whether this extra pay for missed breaks constitutes “wages” that must be reported on the employee’s wage statement; and (2) whether the premiums must be paid within statutory deadlines for paying wages when an employee leaves the job.

The Court of Appeal had held that this additional hour of premium pay is a “penalty,” and not a wage, and that was understood to be the state of the law in California. In reversing the appellate court, the Supreme Court said the answer to both questions above is yes. “Although the extra pay is designed to compensate for the unlawful deprivation of a guaranteed break, it also compensates for the work the employee performed during the break period.” The Court went on to explain, “The extra pay thus constitutes wages subject to the same timing and reporting rules as other forms of compensation for work.”

While not a great result for employers, the court did say that to obtain waiting time penalties, employees must still prove that they were denied the meal and rest breaks and that the employer’s failure to include the premiums on the wage statements is “knowing and intentional” and “and that the failure to pay all premiums due upon termination is “willful.”

The Naranjo case serves as an important reminder to employers to have and adhere to compliant meal, rest, and recovery period policies. If an employee is denied a statutory break period, ensure that the employee is paid the one-hour premium when the violation occurs. Considering the decision, employers will have to adjust their wage statements to ensure that premiums are properly reported and calculated into the regular rate of pay for purposes of calculating overtime, and for paying out final pay.

CanSino CONVIDECIA Vaccine Approved for H-2A Workers

May 27th, 2022

As we reported here, since January of this year, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has required non-U.S. individuals seeking to enter the United States via land ports of entry and ferry terminals at the U.S.-Mexico and U.S.-Canada borders to be fully vaccinated for COVID-19 and provide related proof of vaccination, as COVID-19 cases continue to rise nationwide.  This requirement was extended on April 21.

To be considered “fully vaccinated” for purposes of travel to the United States, vaccines accepted will include current FDA approved or authorized vaccines and World Health Organization (WHO) emergency use listed (EUL) vaccines. Until recently, CONVIDECIA, a vaccine manufactured by CanSino Biologics, China, and commonly administered in Mexico, has not be accepted since it was not EUL listed by the WHO.  However, that changed on May 19th, when the WHO issued an EUL for the CanSino CONVIDECIA vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19.

As a reminder, non-U.S. travelers entering the United States via land ports of entry and ferry terminals, whether for essential or non-essential reasons, must continue to:

  • verbally attest to their COVID-19 vaccination status;
  • provide, upon request, proof of a CDC-approved COVID-19 vaccination, as outlined on the CDC website;
  • present a valid Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI)-compliant document, such as a valid passport, Trusted Traveler Program card, or Enhanced Tribal Card; and,
  • be prepared to present any other relevant documents requested by a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer during a border inspection.

Voices of the Valley: Exploring the Future of Agtech Innovation

May 3rd, 2022

IRVINE, CALIF. (May 3, 2022) – The past month’s episodes of Voices of the Valley, the podcast hosted by Dennis Donohue, the Executive Director of Western Growers Center for Innovation & Technology, and Candace Wilson, Regional Director at Farmers Business Network, feature four agricultural leaders discussing cybersecurity, climate change and the ways to ensure farmworkers attain a solid tech education.

Mark DeSantis, CEO of Bloomfield Robotics, makes a return visit to the podcast to discuss how agtech can improve work conditions for those employed at a farm. It’s not about making humans irrelevant to the field, he says, but instead it’s about creating new job categories in the labor market. “It’s not that people are replaced,” he says. “The world evolves and creates new opportunities.” Listen in to hear about a future world with digital agronomists, horticulturalists and botanists.

Do you use computers in your office? Guess what, you’re a tech company. “We’re not in a paper world anymore,” says Greg Gatzke, President and CEO of ZAG Technical Services, countering the common misconception that there is a dividing line between the Salinas Valley and Silicon Valley. “The more reliant you are on technology, the bigger you are, the more processing systems you have, the more vulnerable you are to attack,” he says. In this episode of Voices of the Valley, Gatzke talks about cybersecurity and virtual threats to the farming, and how his company bolsters safety in the online realm. 

Dr. Jerry Buckley, the President of Reedley College, joins Voices of the Valley to talk about the vital need to expand the relationship between agriculture and community colleges in California. “Across the country, community colleges are the best-kept secret that we have,” he says, noting that with its 2.1 million students in attendance every year, California community colleges represent the largest system of education in the U.S. For instance, the AgTechX Ed workforce development program spearheaded by Western Growers and California Department of Food and Agriculture Secretary Karen Ross to train community college students is a perfect example of the way to pass along knowledge about on-farm skills and technology. “I can teach theory all day long,” Buckley says, “but it doesn’t make sense until they put it to use.”

Sarah Nolet, Co-Founder and General Partner at Sydney, Australia-based VC firm Tenacious Ventures, focuses on investing in early-stage agtech startups with an eye towards how they will help provide innovations to assist with the ramifications of climate change. “Ag can actually be a solution for a lot of the challenges we’re facing,” Nolet says in this episode of Voices of the Valley, noting that growers are in a unique position where they can simultaneously work to reduce emissions and be proactive to prevent additional climate disruption. While advocating for biodiversity, water quality improvement and carbon capture technologies, Nolet says it is important to not let perfection be the enemy of progress – and to also acknowledge that there is no silver bullet because “nature will be ahead of us no matter what.” 

Embed codes for the podcasts are available below:

Mark DeSantis

<iframe src=”https://anchor.fm/voicesofthevalley/embed/episodes/Working-at-the-Digital-Farm-of-the-Future-e1goqnt/a-a7n1nl9” height=”102px” width=”400px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”></iframe>

Greg Gatzke

<iframe src=”https://anchor.fm/voicesofthevalley/embed/episodes/Cybersecurity-and-the-Virtual-Threats-to-Farming-e1h3852/a-a7o9ul7” height=”102px” width=”400px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”></iframe>

Dr. Jerry Buckley

<iframe src=”https://anchor.fm/voicesofthevalley/embed/episodes/Farmings-Secret-Weapon-California-Community-Colleges-e1hcnoo/a-a7pd611” height=”102px” width=”400px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”></iframe>

Sarah Nolet

<iframe src=”https://anchor.fm/voicesofthevalley/embed/episodes/Agtechs-Role-in-Combating-Climate-Change-e1hmr0l/a-a7qlhnm” height=”102px” width=”400px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”></iframe>

Update from the Center – May/June

May 12th, 2022

aerialPlot

aerialPLOT joined WGCIT at the beginning of March, and immediately kicked off its membership by hosting a two-day training session with a key multi-national client. aerialPLOT is a research company that integrates aerial sensors with other data sources to monitor real-time crop dynamics. In addition to operations covering row crops throughout the Midwest, aerialPLOT is expanding its California branch with the recent hire of digital agronomist David Fernandez. The company is supporting grower-scale analytical R&D trials in the Central Valley and Salinas on such crops as almonds, pistachios, tomatoes and lettuce. The company is currently working in 25 states on everything from new cultivars and varieties to emerging biological products in many crop systems. Its goal is to make agricultural research more efficient through better data and reliable technology. For more information, reach out to California lead Gary Nijak Jr. at [email protected].

 

AgNote

Spray applications are a significant part of growing a crop and producing an outstanding yield. That is why farmers need to have a good visibility of what, when and at what cost spray products were applied. AgNote provides users with a simple form to enter, edit or copy spray applications for each field—and it just got even easier. Now farmers can simply forward the Product Use Recommendation to AgNote and AgNote will record that. Of course, it is not all magic, there are a few prerequisites: 1) AgNote will read emails only from currently active users. 2) Farms in the account need to have a Permit Number. Permit Number is how AgNote will find the farm fields to which the spray Product Use Recommendation belongs. 3) Field names on Product Use Recommendation need to closely match field names in AgNote. 4) Spray Product Recommendation must be generated by Agrian.

 

Agtools

Agtools was always developed under the premises of supply chain efficiencies. Few understood the concept before Covid-19 and how the market behavior impacts the ag and food industry starting from research to consumer. Agtools was invited to discuss the topic in venues, such as Agtech Innovation Summit at University of Illinois Champaign and United States Hispanic Chambers of Commerce in Washington D.C., to discuss how Hispanics are part of the solution. Recently, several customers utilized Agtools to visualize production data from Mexico and the Americas to Russia to understand how will it impact the U.S. market.

 

Boost Biomes

Boost Biomes delivers resilient microbial solutions that offer more robust performance, last longer and prevent the spread of pathogens. Based on a proprietary technology to understand and leverage the interactions between soil microbes, Boost develops high performance microbiome products sourced from the native biodiversity of relevant natural environments. The company’s first product is a biofungicide that prevents diseases like powdery mildew, downy mildew and botrytis in grapes, and is expected to come to market late in 2022. To learn about grower trials for the 2022 season, contact [email protected]. For more information, or if your crops suffer from Pierce’s Disease or Leaf Scorch in almonds, contact [email protected].

 

Burro

In 2021, 90 Burros supported table grape crews, autonomously moving fruit from field to pack tables, six days a week. Instead of seeing farmworkers walk several miles a day with a 200 lb. wheelbarrow full of grapes in the heat, Burro allows workers to remain in the field, under shade of canopy, and to pick and pack with a continuous flow of fruit out of the field. Through this use, growers saw 15 to 48 percent gains per Burro, enabling a single season ROI. Burro is a plug-and-play autonomous people-scale robot available to growers that increases productivity in conventional production environments. Burros feature a novel and patent-pending approach called Pop Up Autonomy, which enables the harvesting aid to work immediately out of the box by enabling everyone in a working environment to become an operator. From May until December, Burros run primarily in table grapes and blueberries.

 

Carbon Robotics

Carbon Robotics is expanding its southwestern regional sales and operations staff with a new LaserWeeder support hub in Salinas, with additional facilities expected to open soon in Bakersfield and Yuma. Carbon offers regularly scheduled laser weeding field demos at partner farms across the west. The company recently joined the WG Center for Innovation and Technology and is actively hiring field service engineers in Salinas, Bakersfield and Yuma. The company, based in Seattle, publicly launched its 20-ft. wide LaserWeeder implement at the World Ag Expo in February 2022. It is sold out of 2022 models and are accepting pre-orders for 2023 delivery.

 

Ganaz

Ganaz has announced the launch of Ganaz MasterCard Payroll Card, which it touts as significantly reducing payroll expenses for agriculture and food processing industries.

 

IntelliCulture

Ontario-based software startup, IntelliCulture, has secured $1.7 million CAD in seed financing to fuel the growth of its farm management platform. The round consisted of a group of strategic investors and industry experts, led by Emmertech (an agtech focused VC fund managed and operated by Conexus Venture Capital) and supported by 519 Growth Fund. Founded in 2018, IntelliCulture provides equipment management software for farms to provide insights into spray coverage, operational health and labor management. The platform helps growers realize savings through digitizing and automating the management process. With the closing of the seed round, the company plans to grow its the team by doubling the headcount within the next year. IntelliCulture primarily serves growers in the high-value crop space, but is lately extending its reach into other crop types through their plug-and-play platform. They offer IOT devices that are backwards compatible with all makes, models and years of machinery on the farm that feed data into their reporting and software. To learn more about IntelliCulture, visit: www.intelliculture.com

 

LahakX (previously SkyX Solutions)

LahakX recently announced its new fundraising and rebranding. The new capital from both existing and new investors is being used to strengthen the company’s technology, business and regulatory development. LahakX expects to be fully commercially active later this year when it delivers its agricultural spraying to its comprehensive pipeline of customers. “We thank our investors, and are excited to have stronger resources so we can move faster to market,” said Eylon Sorek, LahakX Co-Founder and CEO. “We are committed to working out all of the technological, commercial, and regulatory barriers, to provide to our customers cutting-edge spraying solutions which will enable them to save time, chemical and labor costs.” Simultaneous to the latest bridge round, LahakX has rebranded from its former name of SkyX. LahakX offers growers and applicators a self-flying fleet of spraying drones.

 

Verdant Robotics

To meet farmers’ demands for more sustainable and profitable growing practices, Verdant Robotics has expanded its robot-as-a-service (RaaS) model to ensure access for more specialty crop farmers. Founded in late 2018 by a leading roboticist, a software engineer, and a California farmer, Verdant has raised $21.5 million to develop a multi-action, autonomous farm robot capable of millimeter-accurate spraying, laser weeding and AI-based digital crop modeling. Verdant uses these tools in an attempt to deliver better outcomes: larger produce, greater yields and significant savings. The company claims to have contracted to service approximately 40 percent of the U.S. carrot market. Verdant logged thousands of hours in 2021 and claims to already have been proven on multiple crops. Combining multiple technologies, the company’s advises that its 6-row and 12-row commercial implements can treat up to 4.2 acres per hour, achieving a higher weed-removal rate per acre than other technology or human ability, and reducing chemical usage by up to 95 percent. Simultaneously, its autonomous software system collects data and uses machine learning capabilities to optimize yield and growing outcomes.

WGCIT Sponsor: RDO Actively Facilitating Tech Advances by Growers

May 13th, 2022

From more than 75 locations nationally, RDO Equipment Co. is a leading supporter of agriculture’s move to a more technology-oriented future. It sells and supports agriculture, environmental, construction, surveying and irrigation equipment from leading manufacturers, including John Deere.

“There are 11 equipment stores in California plus three RDO Water locations along with eight stores in Arizona supporting the agriculture and construction needs of the West,” said Richard Arias, Vice President, Southwest Ag, for the company. “Our focus right now is on increasing the adoption of digital farming tools and techniques across the Southwest. We believe strongly that the way to ensure a productive, profitable, and sustainable agricultural industry is through the smart use of digital tools.”

As the company integrates technological solutions, Arias said it fully understands “that farming is not a ‘one-size-fits-all’ undertaking and not every technology is suited for every farm.”

He added: “We also recognize that not every farm has the same level of technology experience and requires varying levels of support. At RDO, we are here to help our customers successfully adopt technology. We have a team of experts in precision agriculture to provide the technical, data analysis and agronomic support needed to fully leverage any investment our customers make in technology.”

Arias did point to several new advancements that truly meet the needs of specialty crop producers. He said Monosem planters are customized for each grower based on their crop needs and the real value they offer is that they maximize growers’ productivity through enhanced seed starts. Through the vacuum metering system, these planters deliver singular seeds and can do so with a variety of seed shapes and coating status. Mazzotti sprayers, he noted, are a perfect complement to the increased accuracy offered by the customized planters. These sprayers have proven to be particularly valuable to specialty crop growers who need smaller, lighter and more agile machines.

Arias added that the John Deere Operations Center is an online farm management system that collects and stores grower data so they can better understand not only their machines but also their farming practices. He said the center can help with choosing the right equipment based on engine load data including things like horsepower, slippage and fuel use.

He said the data gathered in the center offers the kind of insight that has been the missing piece for a long time. “We’re excited to bring this information to our customers, who can use it to make highly consequential decisions for their operations,” Arias said.

Speaking to RDO’s investment in the Western Growers Center for Innovation & Technology, Arias said stakeholders in the industry “need to be working together so that the solutions we create are actually going to meet the needs of our farmers, and we want to be a key part of those conversations. When we are present, we learn more about what our customers need and how to best support them.”

RDO takes its responsibility to the industry seriously. “We need to be experts not only in the equipment but in the efficiencies created from digital farming,” Arias said, adding that it is the company’s job to be well-versed enough in the technology so that they can help growers use it to better farm.

“We are making significant investments to make sure we can help our customers with those technology transitions,” Arias said. “We currently have eight precision ag specialists in the Southwest alone and will be adding five more in the next year. Those specialists are helping our customers with every step of their process in setting up a digital farming operation.”

Arias continued: “When it comes to data collection and analysis, we will see more integration and insight coming out of those investments. Beyond technical insight, we will be able to mine data for agronomic and financial insight more regularly and easily. For example, we will be incorporating irrigation data into the picture. That means that valve controls, pump controls, filter controls and even well monitoring will all funnel into the online farm management platform.”

Taking a look at ag technology from the 40,000-foot level, Arias articulated RDO’s view. “We are seeing the continued evolution of farming in response to changing conditions,” he said. “First, we are in the midst of this transformation to digital farming, which will bring the advantages of mobile technology and data analytics to growers. Right behind that, we will likely see the availability and adoption of autonomous tractors because there’s no grower I know who isn’t dealing with labor issues. No one sees that situation improving so there is already a lot of excitement around these automated vehicles. All of these stages of evolution are related—we have to use the insights from digital farming to best use autonomous vehicles and, eventually, electric equipment.”

WGCIT Resident: Naïo Technologies Offering New Robotic Weeders to U.S. Ag

May 13th, 2022

Naïo Technologies, a French company specializing in autonomous robots for agriculture, has just celebrated its 10th anniversary with 300 robots in operation worldwide, 80 people employed across the globe and more than 60,000 hours of operations under its belt.

The company has been operating in California since 2019 and now has four robot models in operation with its newest iteration, the Ted Vineyard Robot, currently being introduced to grape growers. This newest robot was formerly presented at CES 2022 in Las Vegas, which bills itself as “the most influential tech event in the world.”

Yet Chief Operation Officer Ingrid Sarlandie, one of 14 California-based employees, said the company is still a start-up. “I define a ‘start-up’ as a highly innovative company trying to disrupt an industry to solve a challenge that hasn’t been solved, with a solution that is not obvious.”

Though Naïo Technologies has proven its concept, Sarlandie said there is still a lot of work to be done. “We are the leaders in the space, but we now need to scale.” She added that work on the robotic machines is an on-going effort with its first U.S. introduction, Dino, having been replaced by a better autonomous machines, the Orio.

The company was launched in France in 2012 by a pair of scientists that Sarlandie describes as “two rock stars in robotics.” The company now has 280 units in operation in Europe. While Europe has been an excellent market, Sarlandie said the potential U.S. market, led by California’s growers, is “huge.” She added: “The market is ready. We need early adopters and innovators.”

Though Naïo Technologies developed the autonomous robots as a solution to reduce pesticide use and the need for labor, Sarlandie said the concept for these robotic machines is to eventually be used for many in-field cultural practices such as thinning, spraying and even harvesting. Weeding is the low-hanging fruit, so to speak.

Naïo Technologies began its quest offering weeding as a service that the company is providing at a cost-saving rate. But the Naïo COO said the robotic equipment is also for sale. She added that there are many very large agricultural operations in California that have indicated their preference is to own the machine rather than purchase the service. In the United States, Naïo Technologies is working through John Deere and its network of dealers to sell and service the equipment. Sarlandie said machines ordered now should be delivered by the end of the year.

Though the mechanical equipment uses robotic technology, Sarlandie assures they are not complicated. In fact, she has been trained to service the equipment and she indicated a competent mechanic can do the same.

With rising costs in virtually all areas—fuel, labor, inputs—Naïo Technologies and its COO believe the all-electric autonomous ag robots are a “no brainer.” Sarlandie said there is great need in wine-growing regions for Ted. She notes that all the robotic units check many boxes for a better world and a more profitable ag enterprise.

In a company fact sheet, Julien Laffont, Strategy and Development Manager at Naïo Technologies, said: “In France, Ted is already at work for big brands such as Hennessy and Grands Chais de France. We have acquired a great deal of expertise on American soil with Dino: now that we have eight robots in service and over 5,000 hectares weeded, it is time for Naïo to expand its presence in the United States on the wine-growing market with Ted, but also with our historical robot Oz which is about to become available throughout the United States thanks to a distribution network (John Deere) that is currently being deployed.”

Sarlandie and her U.S. team are headquartered in Salinas at the Naio Technologies Center and Naïo has a desk at the Western Growers Center for Innovation & Technology. 

Innovation: WG Launching Agtech Worker Program with CDFA Grant

May 13th, 2022

Many rural California economies revolve around agriculture, which produces healthy fruits, nuts, and vegetables, as well as crop revenues and local jobs for both agriculture and service industries that support agriculture. To maintain these rural economies, three major problems need to be addressed—labor, water and food safety. California’s annual crop output  produces close to $50 billion annually, and Monterey County is a top five producer with $4 billion in crop revenue in 2021. Service industries provide significant additional GDP to support the crop revenue in agricultural towns and counties.

Labor remains the most challenging agriculture problem for specialty crop farmers in California and is really two problems in one. First, the cost of labor continues to increase due to regulatory changes. From 2005 to 2017, the regulatory cost per acre per year for specialty crop growers went from $109 to $977, a 795 percent increase. Second, the availability of labor continues to decrease. The clearest indicator of this decrease is the growth in H-2A labor, which helps growers access international labor via a federal permit system. The use of H-2A has gone from 48,000 immigrant farm workers in 2005 to 275,000 in 2020. Many farmers I talk to are considering increasing their usage of H-2A labor because it is more predictable and reliable than domestic labor sources. This introduces a new risk to farmers. Products that are planted, weeded, watered, and grown cannot get harvested without labor if a permit is not approved in a timely fashion.

The combination of higher cost and decreased availability are pushing a lot of growers to aggressively look for automation solutions. There is good progress in some sectors, with investment in thinning, weeding, and planting startups and new innovations in market with field trials and beginning to scale. But the startups are very early, even today. Research that was published in the first (annual) Western Growers Harvest Automation Report indicates that 75 percent of startups in the ag automation space have no venture capital yet, and are funded with founder capital, friends and family capital, and angel investments. The other 25 percent have an A or B round. None of them have a C round. This means that 3 out of 4 are not done building their first real product, and 1 out of 4 are not yet ready to scale their sales and marketing efforts.

Over the next several years, it is likely that some of the startups in market will begin to raise capital to scale and some new startups will emerge and successfully fundraise. Labor prices will continue to go up, which will increase the need for automation. Ironically, the growth in harvest automation startups and their fundraising will create the next challenge—finding a new type of labor, highly skilled agtech labor that understands agronomy, computer science, biology and engineering. These workers are needed to help build the robots, sell the robots, manage the robots and fix the robots. In some cases, the management and fixing will need to happen quickly, or the harvest may not happen fast enough and the crop may spoil before getting picked.

Producing these new agtech workers will be the job of community colleges in rural communities, as well as high schools and non-profits. In Monterey County, Hartnell College will help train these new workers at their main campus in Salinas and at satellite campuses in towns like King City. King City High School will work with the Hartnell satellite to get their students trained. Non-profits like Rancho Cielo will be able to train Salinas Valley youth these new skills. The best part—all three options can leverage curriculum that Western Growers is working on developing with the California Department of Food and Agriculture. Thanks to a $750,000 grant from CDFA, Western Growers is going to spend the next 3.5 years identifying the biggest skills gaps for growers and then identifying existing curriculum modules that can be spread throughout the state. Each community college will build its own curriculum content (and four-year universities are building some as well), and Western Growers will aggregate and help make the modules available statewide to community colleges, high schools, and non-profits so all can re-use without having to build the materials themselves. The goal is to have 3,000 students earn Western Growers certificates in the next 3.5 years. They will be WG certificates because it doesn’t matter which location the new workers are educated in, only that they completed the certificate requirements.

Western Growers is proud to be working with our grower members and local agtech institutions on this program, and excited to watch the results and the impact on local communities as these new employees enter the work force and help push the automation initiatives further faster.

Science: Good Fences Make Good Neighbors

May 13th, 2022

There are many areas in the western United States where specialty crops are grown in proximity to—or at an immediate interface with—various types of domesticated animal operations. These mixed agricultural regions raise important concerns about the potential of human pathogen transfer from animals to crops.

When neighboring operations share the same geography, infrastructure and weather influences, can the solution for enhanced productivity and produce safety be found within the wisdom of “good fences make good neighbors?” A conceptual definition of a “good fence” is one that equally supports the needs of both neighbors, while also protecting each neighbor’s separateness and independence.

In other words, a “good fence” provides each neighbor—in this case, animal and specialty crop operation—with shared and equal protection. Applying this definition within a mixed agricultural system, a “good fence” would need to go beyond a simplistic context of a barrier and be inclusive of protections such as rain runoff, dust migration, water quality, common road use and working activities on either side of the fence that may negatively impact a neighbor. Maintaining a “good fence” would then need to be the shared responsibility of a mixed agricultural community, all neighbors playing a role in assuring mutual and equal protection.

So where do mixed agricultural communities stand on the need for building “good fences”? Is there sufficient awareness and alignment to truly achieve them? Is there sufficient understanding of what’s necessary to build a “good fence?” And if no, how do we move forward?

The California Department of Food and Agriculture launched a dialogue group in 2020 that brought together representatives from across the Salinas Valley’s agricultural community to discuss the varied needs of animal and specialty crop operations and how to generate the best advantage for each operation type for productivity and safety. The California Agricultural Neighbor project brought forward many insights and recommendations toward making “good fences” in the Salinas Valley. The interim report can be accessed on the CDFA’s website; the final report is expected by mid-2022.

In tandem, a nationwide team of public health and industry stakeholders, including representation from Western Growers, also has been meeting for the past two years to discuss a broad range of recommendations to build “good fences” within mixed agricultural communities. These recommendations include these areas:

1.  Targeted development of cooperative extension resources to held assess the needs and solutions within a mixed agricultural community

2.  Additional funding for fundamental research to understand how human pathogens move within an environment and identify appropriate preventive controls

3.  Require interagency cooperation (Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency) to assure there is a framework to assure and support necessary resources for “good fences” mixed agricultural communities

4.  Educational resources focusing on sharing best management practices for both specialty crop and animal production operation.

Western Growers is embedding these recommendations into both our state and federal government affairs agendas. For example, we’ve already taken steps to bring forward the need for a Memorandum of Understanding between the FDA and USDA APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service) to assure that specialty crop outbreaks can be fully investigated if the human pathogen source is suspected to be an animal operation. Additionally, we are working on the state level to support funding for cooperative extension, research and infrastructure solutions.

Ultimately, the best advocates for making “good fences” are the operational neighbors in a mixed agricultural community. Taking a critical look at your agricultural neighborhood, discussing challenges with your neighbors, engaging subject matter experts in water and compost and exploring solutions are all immediate steps forward. Embracing the wisdom of the proverb “good fences make good neighbors” will enhance the safety of specialty crops and preserve the high potential productivity of mixed agricultural regions.

WGAT: Controlling the Costs of Health Care

May 13th, 2022

There’s been a consistent rise in the cost of health care in the last decade. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the average cost of employee health insurance premiums increased by 4 percent in 2021 from the previous year to $22,221. On a macro level, premiums for individuals and families increased 22 percent over the last five years and 47 percent over the last 10 years.

We’ve highlighted a few solutions that will enable employers to control their health care costs while providing affordable and quality health care.

Choosing the Right Plan

Employers have options when it comes to providing employees with health coverage. They can choose a fully insured health insurance policy, where they pay a fixed monthly premium to an insurance company to cover the anticipated costs of health care claims, regardless of whether employees use the plan.

They can also choose a self-funded plan, where they pay for employee claims directly as the claims are submitted. The plan, typically administered by a third-party administrator (TPA), facilitates claims processing and payments, the health care networks and the financial reporting. An advantage to self-funding is that employers are given additional control and flexibility of designing their own health plan to meet the unique needs of their employee population. Employers can also analyze trends and utilization patterns to see where their money is being spent.

Some employers also have the option of joining a unique plan, such as Western Growers Assurance Trust, where employers work together to purchase health care benefits. WGAT, available only to members of Western Growers, is dedicated to offering health benefits for the ag industry. WGAT is tax exempt and governed by a Board of Trustees who contract with health providers to design plans to meet the needs of its members.

Plan Design

Plan design is a critical element in controlling health costs. When choosing a plan, there are several things employers should consider that have a significant bearing on cost:

•   Setting deductibles. Employers can re-evaluate the amount employees are required to pay before the plan begins sharing the cost of covered services.

•   Differentiating co-payments. Employers can offset their premiums by adjusting their co-payment amounts for primary care providers and specialists.

•   Co-insurance amounts. Employers can evaluate co-insurance options and consider a higher co-insurance percentage to offset their costs.

•   In-network and out-of-network amounts. An employer can determine in-network and out-of-network amounts and control how much a participant is responsible for paying. For example, a plan can offer to pay 80 percent of an in-network amount and require plan participants to pay the remaining 20 percent. Similarly, for out-of-network services, the plan can offer to pay 60 percent of the amount while the participant is responsible for paying 40 percent of the cost.

•   Provider networks. Custom networks or narrow networks will prove a more significant savings than broader networks.

•   Generic prescriptions. Employers can incentivize participants to use generic drugs.

Because plan members use pharmacy benefits more than any other benefit, it’s important for employers to choose an effective Pharmacy Benefits Manager (PBM) who will work to make sure drugs are administered correctly and that employers aren’t overpaying. Effective PBMs should also have a solid understanding of medications and drug classes to help identify wasteful spending. A PBM can help improve medication adherence rates and work with members to decrease barriers to fill prescriptions.

Implementing a health management program can also assist employees in managing their chronic health conditions, improving health outcomes, and preventing related risks and complications, ultimately reducing the cost of medical care and hospitalization.

Keeping Employees Informed

The right corporate culture can contribute significantly to health savings. According to a recent survey by Voya Financial, 35 percent of employees don’t understand their health care benefits.

•   Improve communication and educate employees about their plan offerings.

•   Make sure employees understand the providers in their network and also remind them to use urgent care instead of going to the emergency room in non-life threatening situations.

•   Make benefits materials easily accessible for employees so they can make better health decisions.

If you’re interested in a WGAT plan, contact Western Growers Insurance Services for more information at (800) 333-4WGA. For more information or questions regarding third party administration or self-funding, please contact Pinnacle Claims Management at (866) 930-7264.

Ag in the Law: Are You Ready for Health Care Transparency?

May 13th, 2022

In October 2020, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury (the “Departments”) released the Transparency in Coverage Final Rules (TIC) to require health plans to provide greater cost transparency. Two months later, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (CAA) was signed into law, representing the most significant changes to the private insurance market since the Affordable Care Act. The CAA includes extensive transparency reforms, including some that overlap with TIC, but with more aggressive deadlines, and extends consumer healthcare provisions to grandfathered health plans.

The new regulations are generally considered good for consumers, requiring health plans and health care providers to furnish additional information to allow consumers to make good health care choices. The new compliance requirements, however, impose a substantial administrative burden for insurance carriers, multiple employer welfare arrangements (e.g., Western Growers Assurance Trust), third party administrators (e.g., Pinnacle Claims Management, Inc.) and employers who sponsor self-insured health plans.

Although employers who offer a self-insured plan typically contract with a third party administrator to manage their health plans, it is ultimately the self-insured employer—not the third party administrator—that is responsible for compliance with transparency requirements.

A brief description of the significant provisions of the TIC and CAA follow. Unless otherwise indicated, the changes are effective with plan years beginning on and after Jan. 1, 2022.

Machine-Readable Files

Effective July 1, 2022, health plans are required to disclose, on a public website, two machine-readable files showing (i) in-network provider rates for covered items and services, and (ii) out-of-network allowed amounts and billed charges for covered items and services. Implementation of a third file, showing negotiated rates and historical net prices for prescription drugs, has been postponed pending further regulatory guidance.

Price Comparison/Cost Transparency Tool

TIC requires health plans to make price comparison information available, giving consumers the ability to compare costs for various providers. The information must be available for 500 common items and services beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2023, and for all services effective Jan. 1, 2024. Information must be available through a web-based self-service tool, over the telephone or, upon request, by mail.

The CAA also contains a cost transparency requirement, but the Jan. 1, 2022, effective date has been delayed pending further guidance from the Departments.

Advanced Explanation of Benefits

Health plans must provide patients with an advanced explanation of benefits (EOB) for services for which the plan has received advanced notice, such as requests for pre-authorization. The advanced EOB must be provided no later than one business day following receipt of the advanced notice (three business days, if the notice was received at least 10 business days before the service is scheduled to be furnished), and must include:

•   Status of the provider or facility as in- or out-of-network. If the provider is within the plan’s network, the contracted rate for the service must be provided; if the provider is out-of-network, the plan must provide a description of how to obtain information about network providers.

•   The estimate included in the notice received from the provider or facility.

•   Good faith estimates of:

–   the amount the plan is responsible for paying,

–   any cost sharing for which the participant will be responsible; and

–   the amount the participant has incurred toward meeting the annual deductible or out-of-pocket maximum.

•   A disclaimer that the service is subject to medical management, if applicable.

•   A disclaimer that the information provide is only an estimate and is subject to change.

•   Any other information deemed appropriate by the plan.

Gag Clause Prohibition

Gag clauses (contract provisions that restrict or prevent insurers from disclosing price or quality information to members) are prohibited in all new or renewing contracts.

ID Card Requirements

Plans are required to provide the following information on their health plan identification cards:

•   The amount of in-network and out-of-network deductibles;

•   The in- and out-of-network out-of-pocket maximum limitations; and

•   A telephone number and website address for additional assistance.

Network Directory

Health plans are required to verify, maintain, and update directories of network providers at least every 90 days. Enrollees who rely on incorrect information included in an out-of-date network directory may be protected from higher cost-sharing amounts. For example, if an enrollee receives treatment from a provider who is listed in an out-of-date directory as a network provider but has since left the network, claims must be paid at the network cost sharing amount.

Continuity of Care

If a provider changes network status, individuals identified as “continuing care patients” may continue care with the provider for up to 90 days at network cost-sharing rates to allow for a transition of care to a network provider. A continuing care patient is one who is:

•   undergoing a course of treatment for a serious and complex condition;

•   undergoing a course of institutional or in-patient care;

•   scheduled to undergo nonelective surgery, including receipt of postoperative care with respect to the surgery;

•   pregnant and receiving care for the pregnancy; or

•   receiving treatment for a terminal illness.

Non-Quantitative Treatment Limitations (NQTL) Analysis

The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Act of 2008 prohibits a health plan from imposing a non-quantitative treatment limitation (NQTL) on mental health or substance use disorder benefits based on medical appropriateness. NQTLs include preauthorization requirements, step-therapy requirements, credentialing requirements, medical necessity policies, and usual customary and reasonable determinations.

Under the CAA, health plans must prepare—and provide to the Department of Labor upon request—a written analysis demonstrating that the plan’s NQTL requirements for mental health/substance abuse services are no more restrictive in design or operation than those for medical/surgical services.

Prescription Drug and Medical Reporting

Effective Dec. 27, 2022, and not later than June 1 of each year thereafter, plans must annually report detailed plan information, including:

•   The 50 most commonly prescribed brand drugs;

•   The 50 costliest prescription drugs;

•   The 50 prescription drugs with the greatest increase in plan expenditures;

•   Total spending on health care services by the plan;

•   The average monthly premium paid by employers on behalf of enrollees, and by the enrollees themselves;

•   The impact of drug manufacturer rebates, fees, and other remunerations health care premiums; and

•   Any reduction in premiums and out-of-pocket costs associated with rebates, fees, or other remuneration.

Air Ambulance Reporting

Insurers and self-funded plans will be required to report certain detailed claims information (including transport information, network status, and claim adjudication information) for air ambulance services. Reports for 2022 must be submitted by March 31, 2023.

No Surprises Act

The No Surprises Act (“NSA”) protects consumers against unexpected or “surprise” medical bills by prohibiting balance billing for certain services and requiring notice and consent for others and requiring that the prohibition language be provided to consumers on the plan’s public website and on each EOB.

The NSA prohibits facilities or providers from balance billing for more than the network cost-sharing amount for:

•   Emergency services received in a non-participating facility;

•   Certain ancillary services performed in a participating facility by out-of-network providers;

•   Services provided by a non-participating provider in a participating facility when there is no participating provider who can furnish such services; and

•   Services provided by a non-participating provider or facility without the patient’s informed consent.

The NSA also creates a negotiation/resolution process to resolve disputes between health plans and out-of-network providers for balance billing-prohibited services. A new federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process requires disputing parties to engage in a 30-business day negotiation period to attempt to reach an agreement regarding the total out-of-network rate (including cost sharing); if no agreement is reach, either party may initiate the IDR process within four days. The IDR process is administered by an arbitrator who will take into consideration payment amounts offered by each party, as well as median contracted rate, level of training and experience of the provider, and other relevant factors. The arbitrator’s decision is binding and the losing party is responsible for paying the arbitrator’s fees. Each party will pay a $50 administrative fee.

Expansion of External Review

The scope of external review has been expanded to allow reviews of adverse benefit determinations that involve a finding the surprise billing protections are not applicable to the claim.

What You Should Do Next

If your company is a participating employer in Western Growers Assurance Trust or uses Pinnacle Claims Management, Inc. as its third-party administrator, all these requirements have been implemented or are in development for timely compliance by the applicable effective dates.

If your company sponsors a self-insured plan and uses another third party administrator, work with your administrator to ensure that all these requirements are being addressed and your interests are protected. Remember, it is ultimately the employer’s responsibility to comply with these new requirements.

If you have any questions or would like to learn more about these requirements, please contact Jonathan Alexander at [email protected]

Legislator Profile: Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris Represents Business from a Unique Perch

May 13th, 2022

Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris freely admits it was the election of Donald J. Trump in 2016 that first led her to consider a career in an elected office.

“It was a wake-up call for a lot of us, ” she said.

In fact, there was a clarion call for women to get involved and become candidates. “We wanted a seat at the table,” is how Assemblymember Petrie-Norris described it.

Living in Laguna Beach with her husband, Colin, and their two sons, Dylan and Hayden, Petrie-Norris threw her hat in the ring and ran for California’s 74th Assembly District, which includes Costa Mesa, Laguna Beach, Laguna Woods, Newport Beach and parts of Irvine and Huntington Beach. She ran against a Republican incumbent and was among the wave of Orange County Democrats who won office that year turning Orange County “blue” for the first time in decades. Petrie-Norris won re-election in 2020 and has announced that she is running again this year.

The assemblymember admits that prior to 2016 she had not considered a career that would include being in the California Legislature. But looking back on her life, she realizes it is full of taking on new challenges, which prepared her well for her current life in politics.

She was born and raised in California, growing up in a working-class family in San Diego. Her mother was a homemaker, who took on various jobs to help with the family finances, while her stepdad was a union machinist.

Petrie-Norris went through the California public school system where she notes “she received a very good education” that opened the world to her. The first opportunity was the chance to go to Yale University, where she majored in Economics and English. After college, she went into banking and spent about two decades in the finance and technology sectors with stops in Washington D.C., South Africa and London. She worked for Fortune 500 corporations, small companies and start-ups. About a decade ago, she and her family came back to California, settling in Laguna Beach.

In the California Legislature, Petrie-Norris does see herself as rather unique as she is one of very few Democrats that come from a business background. In fact, she said “very few people in the Legislature know how to run a business and what you have to do to keep the lights on. That’s an important perspective that I bring to the table.”

In fact, in reflecting on her three-plus years in the Assembly, she said the concept of accountability is one area where she believes political leaders can take a lesson from the business community. In business, she said leaders are constantly evaluating their actions. Tracking what you do and determining if your actions resulted in the changes you wanted to implement is an ongoing process. “In the Assembly, we spend a lot of time writing bills and passing laws, but we don’t spend a lot of time looking back.”

She said new laws often have unintended consequences and the mechanism is not there to repeal laws that aren’t doing what they were intended to do, which is a building block of any successful business.

Petrie-Norris also notes that large companies and major industries have an outsized voice in the running of government because they have the time and the staffs to be heard. “The voice of small business is absent in our policymaking,” she said.

Petrie-Norris, in fact, believes that her business background can help be that voice. She sees economic growth as a very vital part of the Legislature’s job. Though the farming community often laments that it has lost much of its clout in the Legislature, Petrie-Norris said agriculture, along with other business sectors such as aerospace and technology, are very important drivers of the California economy and the Legislature knows that. She understands the viewpoint that business often expresses that it is not being heard and its needs are not being met. “That is a universal complaint,” she said, noting that farmers are not alone in believing their message falls on deaf ears. But she assures that is not true.

Petrie-Norris said a recent example is AB 1951, a bill designed to fully exempt manufacturing equipment from the sales and use tax. Currently most states in the country offer a full exemption, while California offers only a partial exemption. Petrie-Norris said that during committee meetings on that bill, agriculture’s viewpoint has been fully vetted with Assembly members vowing to make sure all ag equipment receives the exemption. “Agriculture should know that you have incredible advocates working on your behalf in Sacramento,” she said.

Speaking of Sacramento, this interview was conducted on March 4 just a few days after Assemblymember Petrie-Norris fully opened her office once again. “We are excited to be back,” she exclaimed, speaking of the long coronavirus-mandated shutdown of the state’s government office buildings.

The assemblymember expressed cautious optimism that things can return to at least a new normal. While the state’s political bodies have continued to work, much of the action has been done remotely for most of the past two years. Petrie-Norris admitted that relationship building is an important aspect of political work, and it has been difficult to navigate that aspect remotely. “We have been given the greenlight and we are back open and in person,” she exclaimed on an early March day.

 

 

California Government Affairs: Is Transparent Government Gone in California?

May 13th, 2022

At the time of this writing, the California Legislature has left town for its annual spring break. It’s a welcome time for all stakeholders in the legislative process to take a breath, evaluate what has happened to the bills so far and determine the next steps forward that will lead to best possible outcomes.

Like life in general, this is more art than science. The future is filled with a mix of known facts combined with a long list of potential unknown circumstances. In recognition of this reality, learning to “read the tea leaves” is a critical part of a WG advocate’s role in helping to shape the passage, defeat or amending of bills and regulations. This is usually made easier by a set of strict transparency rules. Emphasis should be placed on “usually.” These rules help to plan out the timing of when bills will be heard and provide a roadmap for the lobbyists to use in deciding how to best advocate on a bill. I mentioned in my previous article that I had positive hope for a return to transparent government given the easing of COVID-19 restrictions. Hope remains, but a positive outlook on how the Legislature will operate for the remainder of 2022 is starting to wane.

Transparency is a founding principle of governmental systems and processes in the United States. The founding fathers recognized this in our country’s earliest days, and it has been carried forward with loyalty ever since. Transparency serves two main functions. First, it ensures that an open legislative and regulatory process is followed so that the public has early and ample time to let their voices be heard before any final governmental action is taken. Two, Justice Louise Brandeis famously claimed “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.” Oversight and transparency are good checks on the system to help ensure that government remains honest and forthright in how issues are addressed.

Most of the actual lobbying on bills happens in the days and weeks prior to a bill being scheduled for its first policy hearing. Lobbyists are able to meet with all of the stakeholders, pro and con, as well as with the authoring legislators or their staffs. This is like a well-choreographed dance where all sides know the rules, come away understanding the positives and negatives of a proposed change in policy, and determine the possibility of coming to an agreement on language if there are disagreements. Usually, there are a lot of disagreements!

The COVID-19 pandemic led to a severely truncated version of this process whereby it was difficult to have substantive meetings with stakeholders and legislative staff. Bills were amended at the last possible minute with COVID-19 often used as the excuse. This led to very little time to prepare and provide both written and oral testimony. Unfortunate circumstances for sure but somewhat understandable given that society was essentially shut down.

COVID-19 has transitioned now to more of an endemic phase and society has reopened. Restaurants and shopping centers are back to streaming crowds, who are happy to enjoy the freedom that used to be taken for granted. The Capitol itself is back to being open to legislative staff and the greater public. That is welcome news.

However, the vestiges of the lack of transparency in the legislative process remain. When bills are amended, lobbyists, in some circumstances, have been told that they only have 12 hours to submit a position letter. That is hardly enough time to understand the words in the bill, let alone connect with association members or clients to determine the impact of those words on actual business owners and employees. I participated in a regulatory hearing recently and the informational materials that were to be discussed for the hearing were not posted until after the hearing was concluded. That isn’t acceptable.

One can only come to the conclusion that the diminished transparency in the process is not accidental but is a choice that California government has taken…COVID-19 issues notwithstanding. This doesn’t allow the general public to have their voices heard. However, it has heightened WG lobbyists’ radar to keep a vigilant eye out for any legislative maneuvers on bills that would have a harmful impact on the California agricultural industry.

I remain hopeful and optimistic that transparency in California government will eventually return. Our geographically unique state, diverse population and incredible industries deserve nothing less.