U.S. Exporters Not in Compliance with Taiwanese Pesticide Residue Limits

December 1st, 2015

Due to recent Maximum Residue Limits (MRL) violations on several export shipments to Taiwan, Western Growers reminds members that while the U.S. may have established tolerances on a particular pesticide/fungicide, other countries’ threshold limits may be lower or non-established. Such violations will not only place the individual shipper on enhanced surveillance, but in many cases will increase the surveillance of the entire industry when exporting to Taiwan.

Both shippers directly exporting and growers who may sell to exporters should identify any pesticide/fungicide applications on any lot to be exported, and review MRL requirements of the importing country to ensure compliance. Members can refer to the USDA MRL database available here or go to the link: http://www.mrldatabase.com/default.cfm?selectedcommoditygroup=438.

It is essential that exporters communicate regularly with the individual growers and their field personnel about the need to select fruits and/or vegetables for harvest that will ensure compliance with Taiwan’s MRLs, including the review of spray records to confirm the dates and amounts of application.

Western Growers recommends that exporters strictly adhere to the following procedures:

  1. Require your supplier (grower/packer) to provide a complete list identifying any pesticide/fungicide that has been applied either pre-harvest or post-harvest.
  2. Compare the list of pesticides/fungicides applied by the supplier against the database for Taiwan’s residue limit.
  3. Provide your supplier with the database information to ensure the shipment will be within Taiwan’s residue tolerance.
  4. Confirm that your supplier acknowledges that they have reviewed the appropriate database and is familiar with the pesticide/fungicide tolerances of both the U.S. and Taiwan prior to releasing the lot for shipment.

Again, it is imperative to not release a shipment for export until verifying pesticide/fungicide use and potential residue levels against those of the importing country.

For more information, please contact Ken Gilliland at (949) 885-2267.

California Exporters Face Quarantine Pest Issues with Japan

December 1st, 2015

The pea leafminer (Lirigomyza langei) is considered by Japan to be a quarantine pest. Within the last month, several vegetable shipments inspected at Japanese ports were found to contain the pea leafminer. While the shipments were permitted entry following fumigation, any continuation of pest finds could result in Japan taking stricter action on entry in the future.

Although exported goods may be inspected prior to shipment, the country of import will also do a thorough inspection, which could result in a pest detection. When this occurs at the importing country port of entry, inspectors will double their surveillance by implementing exhaustive inspection procedures, significantly increasing possible pest detections. This exact scenario has recently taken place for a handful of shipments that have arrived in Japan.

Western Growers is taking this opportunity to remind members to be vigilant of any quarantine pest when scouting and selecting fields for export — especially during periods of increased pest populations — to minimize detections during foreign inspections. 

For more information, contact Ken Gilliland at (949) 885-2267. 

Products Destined for Ohio May Be Subject to Tax

December 1st, 2015

Shippers that have sales of product destined for Ohio may be surprised to learn that they may be subject to the Ohio Commercial Activity Tax (CAT).

The CAT is an annual tax imposed on “the privilege of doing business in Ohio,” measured by taxable gross receipts for product that finds its way into the state.

Businesses located outside Ohio, but who transact sales into Ohio are subject to the tax, even if they don’t maintain a place of business, or have employees or property located, in the state. The first $1 million in gross sales shipped to Ohio are exempt. For gross receipts over $1 million, the tax is measured by .26 percent of their annual Ohio destined gross business receipts.

In 2009, the Supreme Court of Ohio upheld the constitutionality of the CAT. In Ohio Grocers Assn. v. Levin the Ohio high court held that collecting the CAT from grocers based on their gross receipts is a tax upon the privilege of doing business and not an unconstitutional tax upon the sale or purchase of food.

If the Ohio Department of Taxation determines that a sufficient volume of product has been shipped to a destination in Ohio, the department can audit the company’s shipments and receipts going back seven years.

If you have been contacted by the Ohio Department of Taxation regarding this tax, please contact WG Vice President and General Counsel, Jason Resnick at (949) 885-2253.

USDA to Hold Drought Stress Workshop in January in Modesto

December 1st, 2015

Do you have questions about water conservation? Are you ready to learn more about water conservation from world leaders in water management? Then you should register for USDA’s “Prove Solutions to Drought Stress” workshop being held in Modesto on January 12-13, 2016. The workshop will provide participants with water management strategies for perennial crops with limited and impaired water supplies.   

For more information, CLICK HERE to see the workshop flyer.

To register, go to www.droughtmgt.com.

Arizona Agriculture Responsible for Contributing $17.1 Billion to State’s Economy

December 1st, 2015

According to information recently released by the University of Arizona, the agriculture industry in Arizona contributes more than $17 billion to the state’s economy. With so much at stake, the first annual Arizona Agribusiness Roundtable was held in Mesa, Arizona today and featured Arizona Governor Doug Ducey and Director of the Arizona Department of Agriculture Mark Killian as speakers. Western Growers staff and several members were in attendance at today’s event.

Ducey provided the welcoming remarks addressing accomplishments in water management as well as the future of agribusiness in Arizona to more than 200 business leaders from across the state who gathered to discuss the future and where the state is headed.

In remarks released prior to the event Killian said, “Agribusiness stretches from direct agricultural jobs, like the people who work the land and those who raise cattle to implement dealers, well drillers, truck drivers, feed and fertilizer dealers… The list goes on and on. Without them, people wouldn’t be able to put dinner on the table or wear most of the clothes they own.”

AnnaMarie Knorr, WG’s Arizona Government Affairs Manager, praised the industry, education and government leaders who met today to discuss the strategic direction the state needs to take moving forward. “It was energizing to see so many people come together to develop a collective, proactive plan for the future of agriculture in Arizona. Western Growers is especially pleased that Governor Ducey and Director Killian recognize the value of agriculture in Arizona and are committed to ensuring that the ag industry remains a driving economic force in the state.”   

The Agribusiness Roundtable is designed to build a better Arizona from the ground up. Other speakers included Arizona State University President Michael Crow, bankers and economists. 

For more information, contact AnnaMarie Knorr at (602) 266-6149. 

 

Highway Bill Reauthorization Containing Ag Measures Moves in Congress

December 3rd, 2015

Earlier this week, House and Senate conferees released the conference report for the reauthorization of the Highway bill. The House passed the legislation earlier today by a vote of 359 to 65 and the Senate will likely take it up Friday or early next week.

Our nation’s highway and rail system are in need of repair and modernization, and this legislation helps ensure those updates will be made by placing highway funding on firmer footing. This package renews the Highway Trust Fund and makes a number of changes that will be beneficial to the overall transportation infrastructure in the United States. The bipartisan package provides more than $300 billion over the next five years, ensuring that projects to enhance our nation’s critical infrastructure are funded through 2020. The bill contains $281 billion for the Highway Trust Fund and over $10 billion for rail-related projects. These funds will be used for continued modernization of highways and bridges, but will also go to further enhancements of intermodal and multi-modal freight transportation options.

Western Growers has been working to include language in the conference report from the Port Performance Act that would require metrics to be taken at all U.S. ports, which would potentially help identify when slowdowns are occurring. While the conference report being voted on today includes a modified version of the Port Performance Act that removes the specific tracking metrics included in the original bill, it does require the establishment of a working group at the Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics to develop an agreed-upon statistical set which would be reported on annually. The working group would consist of private and public sector participants. While the language of the Port Performance Act would have been preferable, it was important that language remained in the conference report establishing the need and mechanism for increased metric tracking.

The conference report has several items of note related specifically to transportation issues. Unfortunately, the legislation did not include increased weight limits for trucks or a provision that would have created a single national hiring standard for truck drivers. On a more positive note, there have been efforts to ease the federal age requirement for commercial drivers down to the age of 18 for certain situations (such as cross-state loads but still within a limited geographic area). While these requirements were ultimately not implemented, the legislation does grant certain benefits to veterans, including lowering the age requirement to 18 for drivers, and exempting some veterans from certain skill tests and medical certifications. Additionally, the legislation allows states to waive the hazardous materials endorsement for agriculture drivers carrying less than 1,000 gallons of diesel.

Unrelated to transportation issues, but important to agriculture, the legislation includes offsets to restore $3 billion in cuts to the Federal Crop Insurance program that had been included in the budget bill that passed in early November. This legislation will also be the vehicle for renewing the Export Import Bank’s charter, which expired on September 30th. One of the items being used to pay for this extension is an increase in customs fees, which will have an impact on the cost of importing product into the United States.

For a more detailed summary of provisions in the highway bill, please see this summary or this article. For a detailed summary of everything in the conference report, you can read the joint statement document from the House and Senate Conferees.

Please contact Ken Barbic at (202) 296-0191 for more information.

Consulate Officials Visit Yuma

December 3rd, 2015

In an effort to better understand the labor needs required for the winter vegetable season, staff members of the Nogales and Tijuana Consulates traveled to Yuma yesterday and met with WG Board Member Sonny Rodriguez of The Growers Company in Somerton, Arizona, to discuss H-2A processes and to see the harvest in action.  

Andy Stark, vice consul of the Nogales Consulate, made it clear that the State Department’s goal is to promote the economy and facilitate the flow of H-2A workers for the industry.

Sarah Ruiz, vice consul of the Tijuana Consulate, noted that providing their consulate with more timely information about growers’ labor needs allows them to process visas more efficiently.‎ “Knowing that you will be needing appointments the last week of October through the first two weeks of November allows us to schedule other appointments around your needs,” she added.

WG thanks the State Department for taking the time to do outreach and better understand our challenges and assist our industry.

For more information, contact AnnaMarie Knorr at (602) 451-0658.

CDPR to Issue Proposed Rule to Further Restrict Pesticide Applications

December 4th, 2015

The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) has announced that it is preparing to issue a proposed regulation in February 2016 that is intended to further restrict the use of pesticides near schools. This regulation would likely become effective in 2017.

WG has expressed serious concerns about proceeding with this proposed regulation to CDPR and Administration officials because we believe, and the data confirms, that the existing regulations that restrict the application of pesticide products near sensitive sites are working properly. California already has the most restrictive crop protection regulations in the country and any future restrictions that are adopted need to be based on scientific evidence.

CDPR is planning to hold at least one public hearing on this issue once the proposed regulations have been issued. WG will provide additional information about the proposed regulation and the hearing time and location once this information becomes available.

For more information, contact Matthew Allen at (916) 446-1435.  

More ACP Detections Discovered in Central Valley

December 29th, 2015

The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) has placed southern Stanislaus County under quarantine following the detection of two Asian citrus psyllids within the city of Turlock. According the department’s release, “The quarantine also takes in a portion of northern Merced County along its border with Stanislaus County. The quarantine zone measures 101 square miles, bordered on the north by East Service Road; on the south by August Avenue; on the west by Blaker Road; and on the east by North Hickman Road.”

The quarantine map for Stanislaus and Merced is available online at: www.cdfa.ca.gov/go/acp-maps.

As a reminder, ACP county-wide quarantines are now in place in: Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Barbara, Tulare and Ventura Counties, with portions of Alameda, Fresno, Kern, Madera, Merced, San Benito, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Stanislaus counties also under quarantine.

PRESS RELEASE: Western Growers Urges Renewed Cooperation on Western Water Bill

December 4th, 2015

IRVINE, Calif., (December 4, 2015) — Statement by Western Growers President and CEO Tom Nassif regarding recent developments in the negotiations related to proposed Western drought legislation:

“For months, House Republicans have been working in good faith with Senator Feinstein, other western Senators, as well as the federal and state administrations, to craft bipartisan legislation offering some relief to California and other western states suffering from the drought.  We share the frustration many feel over the fact that compromise legislation that could help California take advantage of the coming El Nino storms has not been passed yet.  Time is running out, and we cannot accept failure.

I believe that House Republicans and Senator Feinstein are equally committed to achieving success, and that great progress has been made to close the remaining gaps between the parties.  I urge all the parties involved to resist an escalation of public criticism of the other parties.  Retreating to the seeming safety of partisanship is understandably tempting, but we know from past experience that it will only doom any hope of passing compromise legislation that provides our members water relief.  We urge all parties to resist the pull of partisan positioning and recommit to negotiation with a sense of urgency in light of the dwindling time left to take advantage of coming winter storms.”

To solicit further comments or schedule an interview with Tom Nassif, Western Growers President & CEO, please contact Cory Lunde at (949) 885-2264.

PRESS RELEASE: Western Growers Officially Opens Center for Innovation & Technology

December 10th, 2015

SALINAS, Calif., (December 10, 2015) – Today Western Growers held the grand opening of its Center for Innovation & Technology (WGCIT), a technology incubator aimed at bringing innovative entrepreneurs together with farmers to facilitate creative solutions to the biggest challenges facing agriculture.

Bruce Taylor, Chairman and CEO of Taylor Farms, was instrumental in coalescing the Western Growers Board of Directors around his vision to help agriculture facilitate solutions to its resources challenges:

“The fresh produce industry is labor intensive and requires significant use of water and other inputs. If we are going to continue providing safe and healthy food to a growing population, we must collaborate more closely with the innovators and entrepreneurs who can help us revolutionize how we farm.”

Tom Nassif, President and CEO of Western Growers, has been responsible for implementing the vision of the Western Growers Board of Directors:

“In an era of diminishing natural and human resources and growing regulatory and marketplace demands, the future of agriculture depends on technology. The Center will serve as a hub for the accelerated development and rapid deployment of innovative solutions to help farmers feed more people with fewer inputs.”

The WGCIT will help identify and prioritize the major needs facing the agriculture industry, provide support to start-up companies as they develop and refine technologies to address these priorities, and communicate the most promising advancements to the industry and venture capitalists.

Rao Mandava, Chairman and President of Inteligistics, a company that uses the “Internet of Things” and “Big Data” to offer innovative temperature sensor software for the supply chain, is pleased to be one of the inaugural tenants in the WGCIT:

“Inteligistics is proud to be a partner with Western Growers and looks forward to working with the industry to develop cutting-edge technology for agriculture. We are excited by the opportunity to showcase our solutions and connect with like-minded entrepreneurs in a fast-paced environment.”

All WGCIT start-up companies will have access to hot desks or work stations, both with the amenities of a traditional office. Additionally, these tenants will have access to regular programming – classes, workshops and networking events – designed to provide them with the business knowledge and customer relationships they need to successfully bring their technologies to market.

To solicit further comments or schedule an interview with Tom Nassif, Western Growers President & CEO, please contact Cory Lunde at (949) 885-2264. Representatives from the start-up technology companies are also available for media interviews upon request.

 

MEDIA ADVISORY: Grand Opening of Western Growers Center for Innovation & Technology

December 4th, 2015

SALINAS, Calif. (December 4, 2015) — December 10 will feature the grand opening of an agricultural technology incubator aimed at bringing innovative entrepreneurs together with farmers and other agricultural companies to bring forward creative solutions to the biggest challenges facing agriculture.

What

A grand opening ceremony to launch the Western Growers Center for Innovation & Technology (WGCIT)

When

December 10, 2015

4:00 p.m. – 4:15 p.m.

Followed by an open house until 7:00 p.m.

Where

Western Growers Center for Innovation & Technology (first floor of the Taylor Farms headquarters building), 150 Main Street, Salinas, CA

Who:               Tom Nassif, President and CEO, Western Growers

                        Bruce Taylor, Chairman and CEO, Taylor Farms

                        Vic Smith, President and CEO, JV Smith Companies

                        Larry Cox, Owner, Lawrence Cox Ranches

PLUS: Several of the first agricultural technology innovators establishing a presence in the Center

Why               

In an era of diminishing natural and human resources and growing regulatory and marketplace demands, the future of agriculture depends on technology. The WGCIT will serve as a hub for the accelerated development and rapid deployment of innovative solutions to help farmers feed more people with fewer inputs.

To solicit further comments or schedule an interview with Tom Nassif, Western Growers President & CEO, please contact Cory Lunde at (949) 885-2264. Additionally, representatives from start-up technology companies will be on hand and available for media interviews.

WG ANNUAL MEETING 2015 Vic Smith Sees Labor Shortage as Top Issue

December 15th, 2015

Sure, the drought is a huge issue.  But even if we get enough water to grow all the acres we want, we still won’t have the labor to harvest all those crops.
That’s the view of Vic Smith of JV Smith Companies, who completed his one-year term as chairman of the board of Western Growers at the group’s Annual Meeting in San Diego in early November.  As is traditionally the case, Smith spoke of his year at the helm during the “Major Lunch” held on Tuesday, Nov. 10.  He noted some of the successes that the association achieved during the past year, but focused much of his talk on what he called “the most pressing issue we face — labor…or specifically the lack of it.”
Smith believes Western Growers the association, as well as western growers the businesses, need to be much more actively involved in securing workers through the U.S. Department of Labor’s H-2A program.  He revealed that about 140,000 H-2A workers were certified in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015.  Only 9 percent of those workers, who are brought into the United States on a temporary work visa basis from foreign countries, were for applications from California and Arizona.  He said farm employers from the southeast states of Georgia, North Carolina and Florida were much more active with contracts covering about 50,000 workers representing 36 percent of the total.  California and Arizona, he said, produce 50 percent of U.S. fruit and vegetable output but only had 9 percent of the foreign workers.  “We are going to have to pay more attention, do a better job and get much better results.”
He advocated that Western Growers begin taking a major role in securing H-2A workers because Smith said if the western industry continues on its current path, “we are going straight over a cliff.”
The longtime Yuma area grower acknowledged that the H-2A program is difficult to navigate and presents the industry with several challenges, including providing the type of housing these workers deserve.  But he said other employers across the country have done a much better job utilizing this government program and he opined that California and Arizona do not have any other options.
Smith calculated that on average, the two states need about 417,000 farmworkers and there is a chronic 10 to 20 percent shortage.  If all those slots were filled through H-2A applications that would mean an additional 40,000 to 80,000 workers.  He knows that DOL already is overrun by applications, which severely bog down the approval process, and lead to serious delays.  But Smith clearly believes the industry should apply for these workers and make the government do its part on the approval side of the ledger.  He noted that immigration reform appears to have no chance of passing in the near future to help alleviate the labor shortage problem.
During his speech, Smith did point to several major accomplishments that occurred under his watch, including new leadership for Western Growers Insurance Services, WG taking an active role in helping to formulate National Organic Program standards, and the great strides taken in the technology realm.  Western Growers participated in a “Thrive Accelerator” program to identify potential technological solutions to industry issues, and also moved ahead with the development of the Western Growers Center for Innovation and Technology.  Housed in downtown Salinas and staffed by Western Growers, this center is slated to open December 10 and will have a solid representation of innovative companies as tenants.  Smith said the idea is to bring technology innovators and production agriculture face to face to work together on industry issues that have a technological solution.
He also pointed to the establishment of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Colorado fruit and vegetable growers as a highlight of his year in office.  Smith was born in Colorado and still farms there on a seasonal basis.  The MOU has established a formal relationship between the Colorado Fruit and Vegetable Association and Western Growers, in which WG provides government affairs representation on the federal level.  Members of that Colorado association also have access to several WG programs, including many insurance products that Western Growers Insurance Services provides.

 

WATER RIGHTS? Is Change Inevitable?

December 15th, 2015

For 150 years, water right holders in California have been king.  Riparian holders (those adjacent to natural waterways) and Pre-1914 appropriative right holders (those not on waterways, but who have rights to acquire water from waterways and pipe it for use) are considered senior.  Depending on which right is held, right holders are entitled to tap, draw, divert and store water with few restrictions.
The drought, which is considered ‘severe’ to ‘exceptional’ in as many as nine western states, is ravaging much of the West, particularly California where it’s extending into its fifth year.  The lack of available water is testing the state’s complex system of laws and districts in unprecedented ways, calling into question for the first time since 1914 how water rights are granted.
To address these issues, Western Growers held a workshop entitled, “Under Attack: Water Rights, Water Use” during the 90th Annual Meeting.
The panel consisted of five water experts: James L. Nickel, president and CEO, Nickel Family LLC; Judge Oliver Wanger, former United States District Judge; Thomas Berliner, partner, Duane Morris LLP; Grady Gammage, Jr., senior fellow, Morrison Institute ASU; and Ellen Hanak, director, Public Policy Institute of California Water Policy Center. Western Growers Board Member Stephen F. Patricio, president and CEO, Westside Produce, moderated the session.
Perhaps appropriately so, Nickel, a fifth generation farmer, started the discussion.  Patricio acknowledged that Nickel’s family is responsible for much of the water rights we know today with his great, great grandfather establishing family riparian rights on the Kern River in the 1850s.
Nickel said he used to think his families’ “water rights were absolutely golden.”  His current exchange contract allows for 100 percent water allocation in a non-critical year and 75 percent in critical years.  He lamented the fact that though there is more water in the system today than during the drought in 1977, over the last two years, the family has not received its promised 75 percent allocation.  Nickel said even in 1977 they received their minimum 75 percent allocation.  “Government contracts nowadays aren’t worth the paper they are printed on,” he said.  In addition to the drought, he blamed the loss of a “solid water supply” on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and other regulations.
In his distinguished 20-plus year career on the bench, Judge Wanger handled nearly 100 water cases.  Wanger spoke of the progression of how water cases over the years transformed water rights expectations and how the federal government believes the courts overstepped their bounds.
Judge Wanger was explicit when he said the news on water rights is not good and “if there is uncertainty, then expect it to get worse.” His take away is simple: 1) the Delta is broken and can’t be fixed; 2) if you don’t store water and don’t build storage, you won’t have water for either humans or endangered species, leaving us with no alternatives, and; 3) millions will continue to be spent on studies instead of doing what the law says. “This is the reality we face.”
As moderator, Patricio asked the judge if what happened in California could also happen in Arizona.  Judge Wanger said it could happen anywhere there are endangered species, federal contracts or anywhere there is a basis for federal jurisdiction.
Gammage, representing Arizona interests, said the public is getting attuned to water use in a way that that they haven’t been before.  People have awakened to the fact that in the West, 75-80 percent of all available water is going to agriculture.  Despite the fact that they all drink and eat, that usage seems like an imbalance to them.  So he thinks we are going to see an increased emphasis on trying to protect water for non–agricultural purposes, whether it’s urban or environmental purposes.  Gammage said the real message for agriculture is, “You need to get ahead of that.”
Hanak addressed how water transfers are fundamentally linked to the water rights system expressing the concept that “water rights are a kind of property” that can be traded in different ways, even to provide water for the environment.  She said trading helps reduce the “cost” of droughts because water can be redistributed to the people and places that need it.
She said despite trading being a good option, it’s hard to trade water in California.  Shifting baselines make it difficult to know how much water someone has to trade from year to year and it’s hard to get approvals.  She said traders are also forced to jump through the same hoops every year, making the process very bureaucratic.  Hanak said the system would be more efficient if the information used was more transparent.
Berliner touched on a number of significant topics providing both negative and positive observations about water use in California and the West.  On the negative side, he acknowledged that government regulators are finding more ways to regulate the use of water through the ESA, the Clean Water Act and even through hydropower relicensing.  He emphasized that it no longer seems like the state and federal governments are working with water users when dealing with drought issues.  Berliner also pointed to the fact that urbanization is taking away prime agriculture land and that tribal water claims being made are a huge issue that will negatively impact Arizona, California and Nevada.
On the positive side, Berliner doesn’t think the government will be successful in changing water rights at its most basic level.  He said too many outside interests will fight legislators in Sacramento and make it impossible for that type of change to occur.  Berliner believes that the new groundwater regulation laws will eventually be viewed as a smart move.  He is encouraged by the new conversations about water use that are occurring and hopes that any water brought to California by El Niño won’t change that.  In the end, Berliner says there is a tremendous reason for optimism especially if the ag industry can come together and flood the halls of Capitol Hill.  He said the industry needs to embrace change and look at it as the cost of doing business.  We need to ask ourselves, “What’s the challenge?” and then just say, “We’ll figure out how to deal with it.”

 

Keynote Speakers Give Much Food for Thought

December 15th, 2015

The future was on the minds of two keynote speakers who presented some sobering and fantastic predictions about the future during the Western Growers Annual Meeting in San Diego in November.
Provocatively, former chief futurist for the technology firm Cisco, Dave Evans, current founder and CEO of Stringify, said many people think that the first human to live to be 1,000 years old has already been born.  Noting gains in life expectancy over the last generation or two, Evans predicted that the average person born today could easily live 200-300 years.  His hour-long discussion of his favorite subject — the future — was filled with delectable ideas.
For example, he said that in 50 years, 95 percent of everything humans know will be discovered during that time period.  Only 5 percent is already known.  Illustrating just how technology advances in a relatively short time, Evans said the first real computer, which debuted in 1946, had no more computing power than what we find today in a greeting card that plays a tune when it is opened up.  That 1946 computer took up 18,000 square feet and costs $4.4 billion to build in today’s dollars.  Yet it can be replaced by a simple chip that cost pennies to make today.
Turning to agriculture, Evans believes vertical farming will be in play in the not so distant future and that “robots will be the farmers of the future.”  By 2032, he said robots will be developed that are mentally superior to human beings.  And it will only be in 2020 when they are physically superior to their human counterparts.
He also sees 3D printing making leaps and bounds with regard to technology.  It won’t be too long before farmers will be able to “print” a new tractor, and shoppers can go the store, buy a cartridge, take it home and print dinner.  Evans believes the world is only at the dawn of technology with an explosion of knowledge happening in very short order.
Business journalist Stuart Varney, who currently plies his trade on the Fox News Network, also talked about the future but in a much more cautionary way.  He first talked about the economic crash of 2008 and pointed to several factors that caused it and have exacerbated it.  He is clearly no friend of President Barack Obama and believes the president’s government spending policies have led to what is a historically slow recovery from this recession.  Varney expects a Republican president to reverse this trend by enacting individual and corporate tax cuts and bring billions of corporate profits back into the United States for reinvestment.
But he devoted a good portion of his talk to the declining fertility rates around the developed world.  Varney said a calculation of birth and death rates reveals that to keep population stable you need a birthrate of 2.1, which means the average reproduction rate of the women in a country is 2.1 children.  Varney noted that many countries around the globe currently have fertility rates of 1.3 or less.  He says that means a declining population of workers taking care of a growing number of senior citizens to the financial ruin of their economy.
In many countries, Varney said more than half the population will be over 65 by 2020.  That, he said, is unsustainable, and will lead to more failed economies.
The United States, however, is not one of those countries.  According to Varney, only 29 percent of Americans will be over 65 in 2020.  Our numbers are good because of immigration and the generally higher birth rates of immigrants.  That sector is now and will continue to fuel the U.S. birth rate.  Varney advocates for increasing the number of immigrants allowed into the United States legally to keep our economy humming.

 

GMOs To Label or Not…That is the Question

December 15th, 2015

Discussions about the labeling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) were abuzz in the hallways following the “GMO: What’s on Your Label” workshop at the Western Growers 90th Annual Meeting in San Diego this November. Led by a group of industry experts, the workshop engaged the audience in an informative and lively dialogue about the potential effects of implementing GMO and non-GMO labels in the fresh produce industry.
The educational workshop kicked off with Dr. Alison Van Eenennaam, a cooperative extension specialist at UC Davis, who spoke about the science behind genetic engineering (GE) and the potential impacts of mandatory labeling for genetically-engineered food in the United States.
“Scientifically, genetically-engineered food is safe, but many people have a perception that it is dangerous,” said Van Eenennaam. She defined GE as the manipulation of an organism’s genes by introducing, eliminating, or rearranging specific genes using biotechnology. While the application of GE in fresh produce has been limited so far, it could present solutions to many of the challenges the industry is facing now and in the future. For example, through GE, you can turn off a gene that makes a fruit or vegetable susceptible to a certain disease. GE can also result in benefits such as greening-resistant citrus trees, non-browning apples and potatoes, and disease-resistant grapes, Van Eenennaam said.
Van Eenennaam highlighted two driving forces behind the push for mandatory food labeling. First of all, consumers have a right to know what is in their food, as is the case with mandated calorie and nutritional content labels. However, she argued that there is a difference between knowing what is in food and what processes were used in its production. Secondly, consumers should have a choice regarding what types of products they purchase and consume. This is counterintuitive, Van Eenennaam pointed out, as countries that have implemented mandatory GE labeling have generally seen those products removed from the market, thereby reducing choice. Ultimately, she concluded that the science community nearly universally recognizes the safety of GE crops, and no special labeling should be required since there are no material differences between non-GE and GE crops.
The Supermarket Guru Phil Lempert jumped in as the next panelist, building on the topic of public perception of GMOs. Lempert cited that because food labeled with health benefits have the highest sales, more suppliers are listing unnecessary facts to market their retail products, including non-GMO labeling. “We have to be conscious of what product labeling is about,” said Lempert, referring to the potential for consumers to be confused — rather than informed — by non-GMO labeling.
Lempert suggested that Millennials will drive retail trends in 2016, generally focusing on healthier eating and products with minimal processing, making it even more difficult for the industry to fight public misperceptions about GMO products. He stated that if suppliers want to be successful, they need to make a real connection with today’s consumer and help relay the truth about GMOs using the appropriate communications channels.
“Millennials aren’t looking to newspapers or television for news, like previous generations. They are getting their information from the Internet,” said Lempert. Suppliers need to inform the public about the benefits of GMOs through social media platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Periscope. That way, the message may go viral and reach the audience who will have the most buying power in the future.
As part of the discussion about potential paths to progress on the GMO front, Michael Dimock, president of Roots of Change, highlighted strategies and tactics for giving consumers the information needed to make informative decisions about the their purchases.
“The root cause of food system problems is the industrial mindset,” he said. GMOs emerge from the industrial agriculture — the system of chemically intensive food production featuring enormous single-crop farms and animal production facilities — and appear to cause more challenges than they solve. Dimock argued that GMOs are perceived by consumers as part of the concentration of power in agriculture and undermines public trust in science. The result is consumer backlash against GMOs.
Dimock argued that there needs to be a dramatic paradigm shift toward greater transparency, which would include highly-visible studies, publicly-funded science for GE seed research, more diversity in cropping patterns, and allowing labeling. “If you were to label, this issue would go away in the food movement. Allowing labeling will support informed choices,” said Dimock.
In a development new to Western Growers, audience members were able to engage with the presenters by asking questions using the Annual Meeting app. JV Smith Companies President and CEO Vic Smith moderated the session and fielded a variety of questions on topics ranging from GE plants and animals to future consumer trends using the app, as well as from the live audience.

 

‘SHARK TANK’ SESSION Two Tech Firms Stand Out at Workshop

December 15th, 2015

Two firms, both advancing crop information garnered from eye-in-the-sky technology, were the winners during the Western Growers Innovation Arena Workshop held during the Annual Meeting in San Diego in November.
The workshop session featured seven companies, most of which were start-ups, making a pitch to a panel of judges and the audience about what each believed was cutting-edge technology for use in the agricultural sector.  GeoVisual Analystics was the top choice of the judges, while TerrAvion received the most points in the audience participation aspect of the session.  These two companies each will receive a one-year membership to Western Growers as well as be featured in a future WG&S magazine story.
During the session, each of the seven companies was given seven minutes to make their pitch, followed by several minutes of questions from the judges and then the audience.  Following the individual presentations, the companies were scored on several different criteria including the utility and uniqueness of the product, the expertise of the firm’s leadership team, the viability of its market strategy and its competitive role in the marketplace.  The audience used a remote, hand-held clicking device to score each category on a 1-4 scale.
WG Sr. Vice President, Strategic Planning, Science & Technology Hank Giclas said all the companies did an excellent job and some very fascinating ideas were advanced.  Representatives from each company were available throughout the day to discuss their ideas with industry members and there was much interaction and interest.  In fact, both winners noted the quality presentations of all of the firms, and said there was much opportunity for success.
In general, most of the ideas involved providing producers with more information gathered through advanced technology such as aerial imaging, sensors, and ground level photography.  Using water more efficiently was also a theme running through many of the presentations.
GeoVisual Analytics was the first choice of the judges.  The company is offering its proprietary OnSight platform, which it calls “an early warning and monitoring system that helps improve crop yields and reduce losses by detecting problems in the field earlier and with more precision.  Crop scouts, PCAs, applicators, agronomists and growers can all be on the same page about what is happening in the field, along with a complete record of all collected data for thorough analysis and reporting.  OnSight combines aerial imagery, ground-based leaf-level photos, and expert observations into an easy-to-use, mobile dashboard to help growers see and diagnose field problems caused by pests, weeds, diseases, nutrient and irrigation issues or chemical drift.”
CEO Jeffrey Orrey told WG&S after the event  that “our technology can best help the fresh produce industry by helping growers put their labor and resources at the right places and at the right times, to optimize their operations.  With our OnSight platform, we help them know as early as possible when they have problems affecting their crops.”
With regard to pricing, Orrey said exact details are still being worked out.  “We have only set our pricing for our basic level agronomy system at this time, and we are in the process of defining our premium level offerings.  Hence our pricing will vary based on features offered.  Our pricing will be based on acreage covered, but during the WG Annual Meeting we offered a special for unlimited users and acreage.”
TerrAvion was the first choice of the audience, which featured an overflow crowd.  This firm offers real-time aerial imagery service for agriculture.  Every week during the growing season, the company delivers a birds-eye view of a farm in multiple wavelengths.  Using this imagery, a grower can use the photos to plan scouting, management activities, and interventions.
CEO Robert Morris said this low-cost service, which is $10-$30 per acre per annum, will give the grower information that will allow him or her to better allocate their management resources.  The imagery will pinpoint areas of concern and management personnel can be dispatched to investigate further.  Currently, TerrAvion is flying a 1970s-era Cessna to create the images.  Morris said if drones become a more economically viable option, that’s what the company will use.  He said the exact eye-in-the-sky device is irrelevant.  The key is the color-coded images it delivers.  He told the audience that the weekly photographs during the growing season allow growers to compare the progress of the fields on a real-time basis.
Following is a thumbnail sketch of the other five presenters during the session:
Agrialgo Inc /Crowd Scout: CrowdScout is the first real-time agricultural pest database.  The data comes from PCAs, scouts and growers when they capture a scouting report using our quick & easy mobile app.  The data is compiled, analyzed and relayed back to users so that they can see real-time pressure maps (heat maps) of the various pests on the various crops within their region.
Aquatrols: This technology offers agricultural producers unique water savings chemistries that enhance water and solute movement in soils — enabling improved crop performance, and better utilization of water.  Its agricultural surfactants improve the movement of water into the rootzone and increase crop productivity.
Farm Dog: This firm develops precision agriculture solutions for specialty crop farms.  Challenges on all farms continue to increase, yet most solutions addressing these challenges are built for large, commodity farms.  We take the most advanced solutions from the big guys and tailor them to fit everybody else.  Data from our wide array of affordable in-field sensors, measuring soil moisture and electrical conductivity, is fused with additional data streams such as satellite imagery in order to provide actionable insights to the farm.  Now any farm, no matter its size or crop, can manage irrigation, fertilization, and pest-control like the most advanced farms.
FarmX, Inc.: FarmX helps farmers save time and resources while increasing productivity.  FarmX’s FarmMap alerts growers about critical field available water content, plant stress indicators and environmental pest/disease pressure with FarmMap Sensors.  FarmMap Sensors push field data to the FarmMap cloud which provides real time analytics based on state-of-the-art machine learning processes.  The FarmMap cloud leverages multiple data sources to drive precise recommendations that drive productivity gains while reducing costs.
Ground Level Data, LLC: Growers frequently face wild swings in supply with little lead time due to infrequent and small data samples.  Ground Level Data has built proprietary software that is able to analyze every square foot of any produce crop for the factors the grower needs to make the right decisions.  Ground Level Data manages the image acquisition and processing, allowing the grower to focus on the metrics that drive his business using the most accurate information.

 

With So Many Congressmen, Why Can’t California Get Anything it Wants?

December 15th, 2015

California’s Congressional Delegation is the largest in the country at 53 members.  With that many members of Congress, other states usually harp about how California is able to secure anything it wants—but that feeling is more myth than reality because California’s Congressional delegation is sharply divided which undercuts California’s perceived strength.
Indeed a simple analysis of voting records shows that on bill after bill, California’s delegation is spilt. Why is that?  Historically some have pointed to California’s relative size and geographic diversity as the reason.  Indeed, over the years many viewed California as divided on a north-south axis—with the north voting Democratic and the south voting Republican.  That construction of California has however been replaced by a new narrative in which there is a coastal-inland divide (with the coast voting Democratic and inland voting Republican).
California’s once pronounced north-south divide was keyed in part due to the heavy presence of the defense industry in Southern California.  As military bases closed and defense spending declined throughout the 1990s, the Cold War faded and many conservative-leaning voters moved away.  In addition, as defense declined as an economic driver within California, the entertainment and technology industries ballooned within the state.  Coupled with this growth in Hollywood and Silicon Valley, the state has been an influx of young, educated professionals that tend to lean toward liberal causes.
These economic changes arrived at the same time as powerful demographics changes within the state, altering the political landscape.  While the out-migration of Republican-leaning voters helped push California to the left, the influx into California of Hispanics and Asians had an even greater effect.  Between 1980 and 2000, California’s Hispanic and Asian communities each doubled as a share of the state’s population.  Hispanics rose from 16 to 32 percent of the population while Asians rose from 5 to 11 percent.  Indeed, California became a majority minority state after the 2000 census, and today non-Hispanic whites are less than 40 percent of the state’s population.
More than three-quarters of Californians now live in the state’s coastal counties, mostly in the densely-populated San Francisco Bay Area and in the sprawling communities from Los Angeles to San Diego.  As noted, these voters lean more democratic and less conservative.  As a consequence of these changes, the Democratic share of the California vote has climbed in every presidential election since 1992 because every region within the state except the interior has become more Democratic.
The impact of this realignment in California can be seen by looking at recent struggles over water legislation that would impact the drought.  In 2014, both the House and Senate passed legislation that would address the drought occurring in California.  The House bill (H.R.3964) and the Senate bill (S.601) both had provisions that would deliver more water south through the bay delta from Northern California to both the San Joaquin Valley and Los Angeles.  In years past it is likely that this legislation would have been hotly contested on strictly geographic grounds: Northern Californians opposed to sending water south.  While certainly that dynamic played out to some extent, the fundamental shifts in California which have been outlined above, emerged in clear relief.  The House floor discussion was not a battle between House Members defending their respective constituents based on a geographic rivalry, instead it was an ideological battle.  Rather than the House floor debate being based on geographic grounds, the debate was focused on ideological issues around those perceived to be for or against the environment from one viewpoint, or those for or against people over fish.  When it came time to vote on the legislation, Northern California Republican officeholders Tom McClintock and Doug LaMalfa voted in favor of the bill which would send more water from north to south, while only 6 of the 28 members of Congress whose districts lie south of Tehachapi Mountains (Royce, Calvert, Hunter, Issa, Rohrbacher, McKeon and Campbell) voted in favor of the bill.
After the House bill passed and the Senate moved its bill, there was an effort to reconcile the differences between those bills.  We can see the shifting alignment of interests even more clearly when examining the controversy surrounding this process.  As the negotiations came to a conclusion, press leaks began to emerge and some saw the negotiation as too aggressively favoring delivery of water south through the delta which might compromise the environment and Northern California fish interests.  In years past that sort of deal would seem to have not bothered water interests in both Los Angeles and in the Central Valley.  Yet once word became public that the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which represents nearly 20 million people, was involved, board members for the water agency cited concern about the legislation and specifically the environmental impacts that legislation might have.

Biofuel Production: Is it an Option for Specialty Crop Growers?

December 15th, 2015

In this country, biofuel production has been typically associated with corn, although biofuels can be produced from different feedstocks, including crop residues, manure and others.  During a recent webinar hosted on biofuel production, Dr. Stephen Kaffka shared key information related to the current policy, opportunities and challenges of producing biofuel in California.  One of the take-aways from his presentation is that as producers look into exploring additional means of revenue and efficiency, biofuel production shouldn’t be overlooked.
In a 2014 report prepared by the California Biomass Collaborative (CBC) for the California Energy Commission (CEC), the authors suggested that opportunities for crop-based biofuel businesses in California are overlooked.  The CBC is a statewide collaboration of government, industry, environmental and education groups coordinated by the University of California, Davis.  The goal of this effort is to enhance the management of biomass in California for the production of renewable energy, biofuel and products.  Anyone interested in exploring biofuel production as a business opportunity should be aware of this effort to better understand diverse biofuel issues including, but not limited to technology research, standards development, extension and public outreach.
The United States is currently using corn grain for ethanol and vegetable oils from crops like soybeans and canola for biodiesel production.  However, the use of other crops and residues is being researched because of their availability and diversity, in particular in California, where most biofuel facilities are biodiesel manufacturers using residual fats, oils, greases and some vegetable oil.  There are a few large ethanol facilities that use imported corn grain primarily.  Although there are challenges related to the best crop or source for biofuel production, the best conversion technology, future public policies, future global supply and price of biofuel, opportunities exist.
Biofuel production has taken a big shift in the last few years because of the adoption of global warming policies, such as the AB 32 law in California that determines responsibilities and requirements to control and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  California has extensive biomass sources from agriculture, forestry, urban, residues and dedicated crops; therefore, biofuel production could offer an excellent opportunity to enhance resource management and other potential social, economic and environmental benefits.  Most of the feedstocks utilized in California are imported, suggesting a great potential to utilize existing resources and efficiencies.
Regardless of individual and collective position on climate change, the biofuel industry is highly influenced by politics.  This, of course, is creating implementation challenges but is also encouraging technology and innovation.  One important policy is the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, which requires a 10 percent reduction in fuel carbon intensity by 2020.  This policy was influenced by increasing CO2 emissions since the 1990s and is now encouraging in-state biofuel production and transition to low carbon fuels.  Based on the California Air Resources Board (CARB) predictions, biofuel production trends from 2016 to 2020 suggest that, while the use of corn ethanol will decline, sugarcane ethanol, biogas, waste-derived biodiesel and cellulosic ethanol will increase.
Specialty crop producers may benefit from these trends, in particular if they grow winter cover crops as part of a rotational system in land that may not be suitable for specialty crops.  Some biofuel crops like camelia are less water intensive, provide coverage to reduce soil erosion, control weeds and bring pollinators.  For example, they may be grown in orchard and vineyard middles as cover crops to reduce erosion or grown during the winter season because of lower water and nutrient demands.  Fortunately, University of California researchers lead by Dr. Kaffka have developed a model, the Crop Adoption Model (CAM), to predict where in the state it will make economic sense to grow biofuel crops.  This model is based on land use patterns derived from pesticide use data over multiyear periods, which is provided by California Department of Pesticide Regulation.  This model has great utility as it considers data about the production choices, locations and factors in determining such decisions.
Currently, carbon credits and economic incentives to produce biofuel crops are in place in California: the lower carbon intensity of the biofuel, the bigger the incentive.  As we move into the future, new developments in this industry continue to be influenced by policies and research.  This may bring more opportunities for specialty crop producers interested in providing feedstocks to generate low carbon intensity biofuels.  If you are interested in the potential benefits of biofuel production in your current farming system, join this conversation by providing your comments and feedback in our blog: http://www.wga.com/sci-tech/agknowledge

 

Legislator Profile California U.S. Rep Tony Cardenas represents the 29th Congressional District, the San Fernando Valley

December 15th, 2015

Rep. Cardenas was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2012 and re-elected in 2014.  He served three terms in the California State Assembly and also was elected to the Los Angeles City Council

You represent California’s 29th Congressional.  What areas does that cover?
My district covers a range of about 180 square miles from North Hollywood to Sylmar and includes San Fernando, Pacoima, Lakeview Terrace, Mission Hills, Granada Hills, North Hills, Panorama City, Arleta, Sun Valley, Lake Balboa, Van Nuys, Valley Glen and Valley Village.

Where did you grow up?
I grew up in the San Fernando Valley, in Pacoima.

Tell us about your wife, Norma, and your children.
Norma stays busy, while I’m in our nation’s capital, running her small business.  My kids are all artists.  My sons Cristian and Andres are artists and create amazing graphics.  My daughter, Alina, is in school learning the culinary arts.  She also bakes the most delicious cakes and pastries.  That definitely is one of the things I look forward to when I fly back to my San Fernando Valley district.

Your congressional bio says you were raised by immigrant parents.  What did your parents do for a living?
My parents, Andres and Maria, had a first and second grade education when they came here.  My mom stayed home and raised 11 kids, including me, and my dad supported us by working as a farmworker in the Central Valley, before working as a construction worker and eventually starting his own business as a gardener.

How did your parents or family influence your political beliefs and your career choice?
The biggest thing in my office is a black and white painting of my father and grandfather working in the fields of the Central Valley.  I keep that picture in my office because the work of my parents and the lives they led guide everything I do.  My parents taught us all basic values that have guided me well throughout my life: be honest, work hard and be giving and caring.
Those lessons guided my education and work as an engineer.  Academics were not easy for me, but I worked as hard as I possibly could, got extra help and I was honest with myself when I knew I was struggling.  As a small business owner, those lessons from my parents were the only reasons I was successful.  Now, as an elected official of more than 18 years, I look back and see how those same lessons have dominated the decisions I’ve made, and the legacy I’ll leave behind.  I may have been the first Latino to represent the (San Fernando) Valley in Sacramento and Washington, but I am determined not to be the last.  I’m proud to say I’ve worked with my colleagues throughout the Valley and where there was only me, now there are five elected Latinos.  That’s what caring and giving back is about.

When did you first get interested in politics?  Why did you decide to run for elected office?  Did a specific issue lead to your political involvement?
I owned a small business in the Valley, and I had a big house and a nice car and Norma and I had a good life.  A friend of mine said, “We don’t have anyone who grew up here who represents the Valley in Sacramento.  I think you’d be perfect to run for a seat that’s opened up.”  I told him absolutely not.  It took him six months to convince me and my wife, Norma.  That was 18 years ago.

Tell us about your life before entering Congress.  You were both a councilman in Los Angeles and a member of the California Assembly.  What were your biggest accomplishments?  Are you able to continue fighting for those same initiatives or causes now that you are in Congress?
In Los Angeles and in Sacramento, and now in our nation’s capital, I’ve passed laws to help business grow more family-wage jobs and to help create safer communities.
I was proud to fight for one major issue that I’ve brought to Congress and will continue working on, as long as the people of California will let me: Juvenile Justice Reform.  In Sacramento, I created the first funding mechanism for truly community-oriented, evidence-based gang intervention reform.  We have a huge problem in this country in that we put way too many of the kids who should be building the next generation of our nation in jail.
In Los Angeles, I created the first renewable energy portfolio mandate that required the city government to get at least 20 percent of our power from renewable sources by a certain date. Not only did Los Angeles meet the goals we set, but we set a new set of goals that we were also able to meet, far ahead of schedule.
Here in Washington I’m working across the aisle to pass laws to help small business, so we can create even more jobs in the Valley.

Most, if not all of your congressional district, is urban meaning there is little or no production agriculture in it.  How do your constituents view agriculture and its impact on the state’s economy?
I think my constituents understand that California is the world’s grocery store.  Many of them, like me, had relatives involved in some part of food production and are therefore personally touched by how important agriculture is to our state.  That’s one of the reasons I led the way in Sacramento to provide the tax holiday for the purchase of farm equipment and also to provide funding to speed up the construction of UC Merced, the only UC in the Central Valley.

Considering agriculture plays a major role in the state’s economy, do your constituents view water use for agriculture purposes favorably?
I educate my constituents all the time, reminding them that we are all connected to each other and that farmers are using the best practices they can, and continually improving their consumption levels, and that we have to do the same thing.

During Western Growers fly-in this past July, you were kind enough to meet with our members who came into D.C.  You gave a moving, emotional and candid account of your family background that was well received by our members.  What advice would you give to others who might be in similar circumstances as you were in to achieve the successes that you have had?
The most important lesson I learned was to work hard, be honest and smart and you can achieve anything you set out to.  Then, you have to help others do the same.  I had a 10th grade English teacher who believed in me, who knew I could go to college if I tried hard.  When I was in school, I sought out all the extra tutoring and help that was available and I worked as hard as I possibly could to not only succeed, but excel.  Then, it’s important to reach back behind you to help others along.

You are supportive of immigration reform and list it as one of your top priorities.  Now that Speaker Paul Ryan has indicated that he will not bring immigration reform to the floor while President Obama is still in office, what can pro-reformers do to either change his mind or keep the issue alive until a time when it can be voted on?
Ryan is making excuses.  Comprehensive immigration reform can absolutely pass and it is what is best for the economy and the future of our country.  We need to do what is right for that future, not simply capitulate to what might be popular at the time.  We know that a stable, legal workforce would create millions of new American jobs and pour billions of dollars into our economy, truly supercharging it.  This is growing our country with every tool at our disposal, especially bringing 11 million people, who are working hard in this country, out of the shadows.  Those who favor comprehensive immigration reform, the only way to achieve such success, should continually remind anyone in Washington, to whom they talk, of this truth.

As a pro-business Democrat, what issues do you see are the most important for ensuring a thriving economy, in your district, California and the U.S.?  What are your most significant pro-business accomplishments?
Comprehensive immigration reform is the most critical issue facing Congress.  We have the ability to supercharge the economy, creating millions of American jobs and pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into our GDP.  At the same time, it would create a much more predictable, stable workforce, which is critical for farmers, manufacturers and anyone else who wants to know their workers will be there every day.
There are other important issues that face American businesses every day, and I’ve been working in our nation’s capital to help meet the challenge, including working with my Republican colleagues.
I worked with Rep. Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina, a self-described Tea Party Republican, to write a bill that would create a stipend to help long-term unemployed Americans to move to states where jobs are plentiful.
Florida Rep. David Jolly and I created a law to officially recognize companies who hire veterans, to give them an incentive and let consumers know which companies really put their money where their mouth is, when it comes to hiring our heroes.
Finally, last month President Obama signed a law I wrote along with Kentucky Rep. Brett Guthrie, to stop health insurance rate hikes for small businesses and their employees.

What is in your political future?
I just want to do the best job I can at representing the San Fernando Valley, working hard for my district, my state and the country.  All I can do is look back at what my parents taught me growing up. I’ll always work hard, be honest with my colleagues and the people who picked me to represent them, and I’ll do the best I can to lift others up.  With my engineering background, I’m not afraid to take on a tough problem and find a solution that works, even if it’s out of the box.  Finally, as a former small business owner, I’ll continue fighting for the people who go to work every day and grow their business while they help build our nation.

Our members produce the finest fruits and vegetables in the land.  Are you a consumer of our products?
I absolutely am.  I seek out California produce and products whenever I’m in the grocery store.  Thanks to our bountiful farms, they’re not hard to find!