Census of Agriculture Now Available to Complete in Paper and Online Versions

December 28th, 2022

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) mailed paper questionnaires to agriculture producers in Arizona, Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming the week of Dec. 19, 2022.

Producers now have the option to complete the ag census at agcounts.usda.gov or by mail. Responding to the Census of Agriculture is required by law under Title 7 USC 2204(g) Public Law 105-113. Respondents only need to submit the questionnaire through one of the two choices, and those who have already submitted theirs online do not need to submit it again.

By law, all data submitted stays confidential and is only used “for statistical purposes, and only publish in aggregate form to prevent disclosing the identity of any individual producer or farm operation.”

The USDA notes the importance of the census by saying: “The data inform decisions about policy, programs, rural development, research, and more. The Census of Agriculture is the producer’s voice in the future of American agriculture.”

For more information, visit www.nass.usda.gov/agcensus

For state specific questions, please contact the following State Statisticians at 1-800-392-3202:

Arizona – Dave DeWalt

Colorado – Rodger Ott

Montana – Eric Sommer

New Mexico – Margie Whitcotton

Utah – John Hilton

Wyoming – Leslee Lohrenz

VoV Podcast: Central Valley Foundation CEO and Former Fresno Mayor Ashley Swearengin: Focused on A Better Future

December 28th, 2022

“Food is culture. Culture is people. People are stories.” So says Ashley Swearengin, the CEO of the Central Valley Foundation and former mayor of Fresno, who joins Dennis Donohue and Candace Wilson on this episode of Voices of the Valley to share her visions, goals and accomplishments about building a bridge to a brighter future.

Whether the goal is to stem groundwater depletion, halt runaway sprawl, or promote innovation, one component comes up throughout her message: comprehensive partnership. Change for the better happens when people make a point to gather and work together.

Her work to bring everyone to the table has carried over from her accomplishments as mayor to her work with The Future of Food Innovation (F3) program. “The whole point of F3 is to set a table big enough for every aspect of the food economy to have a seat at the table and work together to particulate on a 20-year vision of how we make all of these things work together,” she says.

Click here to listen to this week’s episode.

U.S. Department of Labor publishes Additional H-2A FAQs

December 9th, 2022

The U.S. Department of Labor has published a third set of FAQs regarding the 2022 H-2A Final Rule. According to DOL’s press statement the Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) has issued a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), Round 3 – Job Offers, Assurances, and Obligations – Wages, associated with the publication of the final rule, Temporary Agricultural Employment of H-2A Nonimmigrants in the United States (“2022 H-2A Final Rule”) dated Dec. 7, 2022.

The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) is also posting guidance and information regarding H-2A program obligations, requirements, and compliance under the 2022 H-2A Final Rule. For example, WHD has posted fact sheets on its website providing general information about recruitment, notifications, wages, and housing.

NLRB Orders Consequential Damages

December 16th, 2022

On December 13, 2022, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), by a 3-2 majority, issued a very “consequential” decision in the case of Thryv, Inc. and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. Like the ALRB, the NLRB’s standard remedy for unlawful terminations include backpay directly related to lost payroll and fringe benefits. With the new ruling, in an effort to “ensure that affected employees are made fully whole,” the NLRB will now order compensation for affected employees for “all direct or foreseeable pecuniary harms” that employees suffer as a result of unfair labor practices. These will include things like medical expenses that employees have to pay out of pocket because they lost health insurance due to an unlawful termination.

In this case, the employer (Thryv, Inc.) decided to eliminate a lower-level position and terminated six employees. The union requested information on market data to bargain for alternate positions for the terminated employees and also attempted to bargain for a successor agreement. Thryv never provided the requested information and terminated the employees prior to meeting and conferring. The NLRB found that Thryv laid the employees off in bad faith, both due to its failure to provide requested information for the union’s counter proposals and due to Thryv making “unilateral changes” by eliminating a position during the pendency of bargaining a successor agreement.

The three Democrat appointed NLRB judges ordered Thryv pay the terminated employees backpay and any other expenses the employees incurred as a direct or foreseeable result of the termination, including “reasonable search-for-work and interim employment expenses.” The two dissenting Republican members of the Board argued the new standard is too broad and opens the door to speculative damages as the standard does not provide how long the chain of causation may stretch from unfair labor practice to “foreseeable losses.” Additionally, they argued that calculating these consequential damages will make compliance proceedings unnecessarily long and delay workers from getting back pay.

There is no word from Thryv’s attorneys yet, but we expect they will appeal this decision to the United States Court of Appeals.

What This Means for Employers:
If this decision survives any prospective appeal and becomes the NLRB’s new standard, it is expected that the ALRB will eagerly follow suit and begin issuing decisions to include future consequential damages in their damage calculations. This is another reminder that employers must ensure compliance with the National Labor Relations Act and Agricultural Labor Relations Act, depending on which law covers their operations. Further, employers should be mindful that they are subject to the NLRA/ALRA regardless of whether they employ a unionized workforce or not.

The goal of this article is to provide employers with current labor and employment law information. The contents should neither be interpreted as, nor construed as legal advice or opinion. The reader should consult with Barsamian & Moody at (559) 248-2360 for individual responses to questions or concerns regarding any given situation.  

Author: Pat Moody with Barsamian & Moody

The Speak Out Act

December 16th, 2022

On December 7, 2022, President Biden signed the “Speak Out Act.” (“Speak Out”).  “Speak Out” voids in as unenforceable any non-disclosure or non-disparagement agreement related to workplace sexual harassment and sexual assault.  The Act bars employers from enforcing such agreements with former or current employees, independent contractors, providers of goods and services, and consumers that contain a non-disclosure and non-disparagement provision prohibiting any discussion related to sexual assault or harassment.

“Speak out” is squarely aimed at preventing situations where alleged victims of sexual harassment or assault were limited in their ability to come forward publicly with their allegations and lines up with other federal and state legislative efforts to limit the use and/or enforcement of confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in settlement agreements.

California passed the Silenced No More Act in 2021; a law that bars enforcement of non-disclosure and non-disparagement provisions in employment-related settlement agreements related to all claims of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.

Employers should review their employment agreements, confidentiality agreements, arbitration agreements, and employee handbooks and policies to ensure they are in compliance with the Speak Out Act, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, the Silenced No More Act (in California), as well as applicable state and local laws.

Author: Pat Moody with Barsamian & Moody

U.S DOL Publishes Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWR) for 2023

December 23rd, 2022

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has published the 2023 Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWR) for the employment of temporary or seasonal nonimmigrant foreign workers (H-2A workers) to perform agricultural labor or services other than the herding or production of livestock on the range.

Starting January 1, 2023, the AEWRs to be paid for H-2A workers are as follows:

  • Arizona           $15.62
  • California        $18.65
  • Colorado         $16.34
  • New Mexico    $15.62

AEWRs are the minimum wage rates the DOL has determined must be offered and paid by employers to H-2A workers and workers in corresponding employment. DOL’s H-2A regulations[i] provide qualifying workers must be paid at least the highest of:

  1. The AEWR;
  2. A prevailing wage rate if the Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) Administrator has approved a prevailing wage survey for the applicable crop activity or agricultural activity and, if applicable, a distinct work task or tasks performed in that activity;
  3. The agreed-upon collective bargaining wage rate;
  4. The Federal minimum wage rate; or
  5. The State minimum wage rate, whichever is highest, for every hour or portion thereof worked during a pay period.

Further, when the AEWR is adjusted during a work contract and is higher than the highest of the previous wage rate (whether determined using AEWR, a prevailing rate for the crop activity or agricultural activity and, if applicable, a distinct work task or tasks performed in that activity and geographic area, the agreed-upon collective bargaining wage, the Federal minimum wage rate, or the State minimum wage rate), the employer must pay at least that adjusted AEWR upon the effective date of the new rate, as provided in the applicable Federal Register Notice.[ii]

Similarly, when the AEWR is adjusted during a work contract and lower than the wage rate that is guaranteed on the job order, the employer must continue to pay at least the wage rate guaranteed on the job order.[iii]

View the December 16, 2022 Federal Register Notice
View the DOL’s AEWR webpage
View the AEWR wage map for 2023


[i] 20 CFR 655.122(l).

[ii] 20 CFR 655.120(b)(3).

[iii] 20 CFR 655.120(b)(4).

RxDC Reporting Enforcement Relief Announced: More Time to Comply!

December 30th, 2022

Although they are cutting it a little close, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury (the “Departments”) have given us all a gift for the holidays: The Departments announced today that they are offering enforcement relief in connection with the Prescription Drug Data Collection (RxDC) Reporting mandate. For those who have been struggling to meet the December 27 compliance deadline – particularly those with self-funded plans – this is very good news, and may make your holiday season feel a bit more merry and bright.

Under existing rules, by December 27, 2022, plans and issuers are required to report prescription drug and health plan data for the 2020 and 2021 calendar (or “reference”) years. By June 1, 2023, plans and issuers are required to report for the 2022 reference year.

In a set of FAQs (Part 56) issued December 23, 2022, the Departments announced two forms of enforcement relief in connection with reporting for the 2020 and 2021 reference years. (The relief does not apply to the 2022 reference year reporting due June 1, 2023.)

First, “for the 2020 and 2021 data submissions that are due by December 27, 2022, the Departments will not take enforcement action with respect to any plan or issuer that uses a good faith, reasonable interpretation of the regulations and the Prescription Drug Data Collection (RxDC) Reporting Instructions in making its submission.” This will help many reporting entities that are struggled to interpret the available guidance and apply it to their existing data and administrative processes. The Departments had previously announced in the text of the Instructions some limited enforcement relief in connection with reporting average monthly premiums for the 2020 and 2021 reference years, but this new announcement has a broader application.

Second, the Departments are giving plans and issuers more time to comply, by announcing a grace period that will run through January 31, 2023: “The Departments are also providing a submission grace period through January 31, 2023, and will not consider a plan or issuer to be out of compliance with these requirements provided that a good faith submission of 2020 and 2021 data is made on or before that date.”

Why are they doing this? The Departments “recognize the significant operational challenges that plans and issuers may have encountered in complying with these reporting requirements.” They also recognize that “given the novelty and complexity of the requirements, there may be errors or other issues with the first round of data submissions, despite good faith efforts by plans and issuers.” Many of you will be able to echo these concerns.

After announcing the enforcement relief, the Departments then include in Part 56 a set of FAQs that answer some common questions and concerns about the data collection and submission process. The FAQs address such issues as multiple submissions by the same reporting entity or by multiple reporting entities, the ability to submit certain limited data by email rather than through the HIOS system (which some users find challenging), and reporting on vaccines.

Article Written By: Marilyn Monahan (Monahan Law Office)

ALRB Releases Guidance on AB 2183 (Card Check)

December 30th, 2022

On December 28, 2022, the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB) issued guidance regarding the implementation of AB 2183 which makes significant changes to the Agricultural Labor Relations Act. Agricultural employers may now register online to enter into a labor peace compact pursuant to new Labor Code section 1156.35. A list of employers who have so registered will be made publicly available on the ALRB’s website. The ALRB also has released updated procedural forms applicable to the labor peace and non-labor peace election alternatives adopted in AB 2183, including a form for requesting mail-ballots for a labor peace election. 

As discussed here, Western Growers strongly urges farm employers to not register for “labor peace” status.  Members should seek legal counsel to fully understand the legal obligations of signing the labor peace compact, as registering to enter the compact requires employers to give up important rights such as preventing union organizers from accessing their private property and speaking with their employees about the disadvantages of joining a union. Labor peace compacts typically remain valid for one year and renew automatically for successive years, unless revoked during the 30-day period before January 1 of the next calendar year.  Once submitted, this agreement may not be revoked except during this annual 30-day period.  The ALRB website also contains a form for employees and unions to order mail voting kits and petition forms for unions to petition the ALRB for a “labor peace” mail ballot election or a “non-labor peace” card check election.

The AB 2183 guidance, updated forms, and employer labor peace compact registration page are available on the Procedural Forms page on the ALRB’s web site at: https://www.alrb.ca.gov/forms-publications/procedural-forms/

Prepare Now for Year End Harassment Prevention Training

December 2nd, 2022

Harassment, discrimination, and retaliatory conduct remain a concern and source of potential risk for employers. Sexual harassment also continues to be a serious area of liability with impacted employers seeing record settlements and damages awards.

The California employer’s duty to prevent harassment includes training all employees on preventing sexual harassment and abusive conduct in the workplace. Employers with five or more employees must provide:

  • One hour of interactive training and education on sexual harassment to all non-supervisory personnel.
  • Two hours of interactive training and education on sexual harassment to all supervisory personnel.

Other factors important to fulfilling mandated training obligations include:

  • Providing training once every two years and within six months of assuming a supervisor or non-supervisory role.
  • Providing training on preventing abusive conduct and practical examples of harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation.

Training may be virtual or in-person but must be conducted by qualified instructors. Online training is offered through the California Civil Rights Department (Formerly California Department of Fair Employment and Housing) as well as through Western Growers University.

Managing Holiday Cheer

December 2nd, 2022

With the holiday season in full swing and many companies looking forward to once again hosting their employees for in-person holiday parties, it’s a good time to begin managing the holiday cheer. Whether your company will be hosting a formal or casual holiday get together these tips and reminders should help keep partygoers and companies out of legal hot water!

Policy Reminders: It is always a good practice to remind employees ahead of any company get together that company sanctioned events are an extension of workplace norms, policies and procedures. It is important that employees understand that this is the case regardless of whether the event takes place on or off company property. Reminders should include the company’s policies on drug and alcohol use, anti-harassment and social media.

Avoid Compulsory Attendance: Employers must be mindful that not all employees celebrate the same holidays or in fact celebrate the holidays at all. Compulsory attendance at holiday events may cause undue pressure, trigger social anxiety and place undue pressure on employees who feel they must ‘go along’ to ‘get along.’ To avoid any missteps a best practice in this regard is to make attendance truly voluntary; don’t over-do the ‘we haven’t heard from you yet’ email reminders.

Be As Inclusive As Possible: Avoid risk associated with discriminatory conduct by making the extra effort to ensure event facilities can accommodate disabled employees and their guest(s). If alcohol is to be served, make sure there are non-alcoholic options and if you are asking employees to RSVP consider including space for employees to list any special dietary restrictions or allergies.

Holiday get togethers can be a great morale booster and a welcome opportunity to celebrate company “wins” over the past year. With a bit of planning and forethought they can also be a professional and fun group event.

CO Paid Family Leave Program Begins January 2023

December 9th, 2022

Colorado’s Family and Medical Leave Insurance (FMLI) program is scheduled to start January 1., 2023. Employers and employees across Colorado are required to notify employees of payroll deductions by posting the Required Program Notice on or before the January 2023 deadline.

Premium deductions begin in January however, the first payment employers are required to make to the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment isn’t due until April 30, 2023[i]. Employers must register on the new My FAMLI+ Employer portal before the first quarterly premium payment is due.

Employers and their employees both fund the FAMLI program, with employers paying at least 50% of the cost. Premiums are set to 0.9% of the employee’s wage, with 0.45% paid by the employer and 0.45% paid by the employee.  Premiums may be adjusted in future years but are capped by law at 1.2%. Small employers with 9 or fewer employees aren’t required to cover the employer share of premiums and are only responsible for deducting and remitting the 0.45% employee share to the FAMLI Division once a quarter.

Private employers of any size can apply to use a private insurance plan that offers the same or greater benefits and protections as the FAMLI plan, but such plans must get prior approval from the FAMLI Division.

For more details visit FAMLI.colorado.gov.


[i] A 30-day grace period will be offered before the first payment is considered late.

Colorado Extends Its COVID-19 Disaster Emergency Declaration

December 9th, 2022

On November 11, 2022, Colorado’s Governor issued an Executive Order extending the state’s COVID-19 disaster emergency declaration. The declaration which has been in place since March 2020 will now include “Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), influenza, and other respiratory illnesses.”

The Order does not create any new requirements when it comes to providing public health emergency leave but it does expand – beyond COVID-19 – the types of conditions used to take leave under the current public health emergency. Public health emergency leave may be requested under the following circumstances where an individual is:

  1. Needing to self-isolate due to a diagnosis, or symptoms, of the PHE communicable illness (e.g., COVID-19, RSV, influenza and other respiratory illnesses)
  2. Seeking diagnosis, treatment, or care of the illness, including preventive care like vaccination
  3. Exclude from work by a government health official, or an employer, due exposure to, or symptoms of, the illness (whether or not are actually diagnosed with the illness)
  4. Unable to work due to a health condition that may increase susceptibility to, or risk of, the illness or
  5. Caring for a child or other family member in category 1-3, or whose school, child care provider, or other care provider is unavailable, closed, or providing remote instruction due to the PHE.

The Colorado Department of Labor and Employment’s Interpretive Notice & Formal Opinion #6 clarifies that an employee’s allotted sick time under the state’s Healthy Families and Workplaces Act must be supplemented in connection with public health emergency leave at the time such leave is requested.

The requirement to provide public health emergency leave is ongoing and will continue until four weeks after all applicable federal or state public health emergencies have ended.

For additional guidance check out the CDLE’s website.

Important Wage and Hour Reminders for CA Employers

December 9th, 2022

A new year is just around the corner – can you believe it! Time to begin planning for important changes in California wage and hour laws taking effect January 1, 2023.

Minimum Wage:
On January 1, 2023, California’s minimum wage increases to $15.50 per hour. This marks the first increase since 2017 that impacts all employers regardless of the number of workers employed. The increase also impacts pay requirements for exempt workers who must be paid a salary of at least two times the current minimum wage.[i]

Overtime for Agricultural Workers:
Assembly Bill 1066 (2016) created a timetable for agricultural workers to receive overtime pay so that they will gradually receive overtime pay on the same basis as workers in most other industries. Starting January 1, 2023, employers with 25 or fewer employees will be required to pay overtime (1.5x regular rate of pay) after 9 hours per day or 50 hours per workweek. 

Employers should begin preparing for these changes by auditing current pay practices internally and with third-party pay providers. A review of exempt positions should also be initiated to ensure compliance with 2023 salary minimums.

Pay Transparency:
California’s SB 1162 revises existing pay transparency laws to require an employer, upon request, to provide to an employee the pay scale for the position in which the employee is currently employed.

Additionally, employers with 15+ employees will also be required to include the pay scale for a position in any job posting – this includes postings managed by third parties.

Record retention provisions within the statute require an employer to maintain records of job title and wage rate history for each employee for the duration of the employment plus three years after the end of the employment.

Employers should begin company-wide revisions to all job descriptions to include pay scale information. This will assure all job posting include the required pay information and will make it easier to provide pay information when requested by current employees. Record retention policies should also be revised to ensure pay transparency records are maintained in accordance with new statutory requirements.


[i] The 2023 salary threshold will be $64,480.00

Tips for I-9 Compliance in the New Year

December 16th, 2022

The approach of a new year always presents a great opportunity for employers to review and, as necessary, revise existing policies and practices. Immigration documentation in the workplace has seen some significant changes over the past year with further developments expected in 2023. Below are a few key tips to help you remain complaint in the new year.

Always use the most current form I-9. As discussed here, employers may continue using the current Form I-9 even though its expiration date was October 31, 2022. According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a new version of the Form I-9 will be published via Federal Register notice which is expected sometime in early 2023. The new form proposes significant changes including combining Section 1 and 2 onto a single page in an effort to reduce paper use and streamlined AI scanning to reduce errors. Updates to Section 3 are anticipated to include a ‘use as needed’ designation for rehires, name changes and updating.

Utilize USCIS resources to help avoid errors. The ICE website contains several employer-focused resources that can assist in reducing errors and provide guidance. In addition to helpful FAQs, ICE has also updated its I-9 Inspection Process Flowchart. The chart provides useful details on various Notices (e.g., Notices of Suspect Documents, Notices of Discrepancies and Notice of Technical Procedures/Failures).

Be mindful of temporary “flexible” COVID-associated remote document inspection rules. As discussed here, ICE has repeatedly extended its temporary “flexible” rules since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. While employers are currently allowed to operate under the flexible rules, it is important to keep in mind that in-person inspection is required once the employee stops working remotely and begins to report – on a regular, consistent or predictable basis – to the physical worksite. Relaxed rules are in place until July 31, 2023 unless extended or adopted permanently. 

U.S. DOL Publishes Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWR) for 2023

December 20th, 2022
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has published the 2023 Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWR) for the employment of temporary or seasonal nonimmigrant foreign workers (H-2A workers) to perform agricultural labor or services other than the herding or production of livestock on the range. 
Starting January 1, 2023, the AEWRs to be paid for H-2A workers are as follows:
  • Arizona         $15.62
  • California      $18.65
  • Colorado       $16.34
  • New Mexico  $15.62
AEWRs are the minimum wage rates the DOL has determined must be offered and paid by employers to H-2A workers and workers in corresponding employment. The DOL’s H-2A regulations  provide qualifying workers must be paid at least the highest of: 
 
(i) The AEWR; 
(ii) A prevailing wage rate if the Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) Administrator has approved a prevailing wage survey for the applicable crop activity or agricultural activity and, if applicable, a distinct work task or tasks performed in that activity; 
(iii) The agreed-upon collective bargaining wage rate; 
(iv) The Federal minimum wage rate; or 
(v) The State minimum wage rate, whichever is highest, for every hour or portion thereof worked during a pay period. 
 
Further, when the AEWR is adjusted during a work contract and is higher than the highest of the previous wage rate (whether determined using AEWR, a prevailing rate for the crop activity or agricultural activity and, if applicable, a distinct work task or tasks performed in that activity and geographic area, the agreed-upon collective bargaining wage, the Federal minimum wage rate, or the State minimum wage rate), the employer must pay at least that adjusted AEWR upon the effective date of the new rate, as provided in the applicable Federal Register Notice.  
 
Similarly, when the AEWR is adjusted during a work contract and lower than the wage rate that is guaranteed on the job order, the employer must continue to pay at least the wage rate guaranteed on the job order.  
 
View the December 16, 2022 Federal Register Notice
View the DOL’s AEWR webpage
View the AEWR wage map for 2023

Cal-OSHA Votes to Adopt Non-Emergency COVID-19 Prevention Regulations

December 23rd, 2022

California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (Cal-OSHA) voted on December 15, 2022, to adopt non-emergency COVID-19 Prevention regulations. The regulations are anticipated to take effect January 2023 once approved by the Office of Administrative Law. The regulations will remain in effect for two years after their effective date, except for the recordkeeping subsections that will remain in effect for three years. The non-emergency regulations include some of the same requirements found in current COVID-19 ETS, as well as new provisions.

Cal/OSHA has created a new COVID-19 Prevention Non-Emergency Regulation webpage with an updated fact sheet. Additional resources, such as FAQs and a model written program for employers to use as an example are expected in the coming year. Current regulations remain in effect until the new regulations are approved. The regulations will apply to most workers in California who are not covered by the Aerosol Transmissible Diseases standard.

Continuing COVID-19 ETS regulations will include the following:

  • Employers must provide face coverings and ensure they are worn by employees when California Department of Public Health (CDPH) requires their use.
    • Employers must review CDPH Guidance for the Use of Face Masks to learn when employees must wear face coverings.
    • Note: Employees still have the right to wear face coverings at work and to request respirators from the employer when working indoors and during outbreaks.
  • Employers must report information about employee deaths, serious injuries, and serious occupational illnesses to Cal/OSHA, consistent with existing regulations.
  • Employers must make COVID-19 testing available at no cost and during paid time to employees following a close contact.
  • Employers must exclude COVID-19 cases from the workplace until they are no longer an infection risk and implement policies to prevent transmission after close contact.
  • Employers must review CDPH and Cal/OSHA guidance regarding ventilation, including CDPH and Cal/OSHA Interim Guidance for Ventilation, Filtration, and Air Quality in Indoor Environments. Note: Employers must also develop, implement, and maintain effective methods to prevent COVID-19 transmission by improving ventilation.

Some of the most notable changes under the new regulations include the following:

  • Employers are no longer required to maintain a standalone COVID-19 Prevention Plan (CPP). Instead, employers must now address COVID-19 as a workplace hazard under the requirements found in section 3203 (Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP)), and include their CPP procedures to prevent this health hazard in their written IIPP or in a separate document.
    • Employers must do the following:
      • Provide effective COVID-19 hazard prevention training to employees.
      • Provide face coverings when required by CDPH and provide respirators upon request.
      • Identify COVID-19 health hazards and develop methods to prevent transmission in the workplace.
      • Investigate and respond to COVID-19 cases and certain employees after close contact.
      • Make testing available at no cost to employees, including to all employees in the exposed group during an outbreak or a major outbreak.
      • Notify affected employees of COVID-19 cases in the workplace.
      • Maintain records of COVID-19 cases and immediately report serious illnesses to Cal/OSHA and to the local health department when required.
  • Employers must now report major outbreaks to Cal/OSHA.
  • Employers are no longer required to pay employees exclusion pay while they are excluded from work. Instead, the regulations require employers to provide employees with information regarding COVID-19 related benefits they may be entitled to under federal, state, or local laws; their employer’s leave policies; or leave guaranteed by contract.

Changes to existing definitions for “close contact” and “exposed group” are as follows:

  • “Close contact” is now defined by looking at the size of the workplace in which the exposure takes place.
    • For indoor airspaces of 400,000 or fewer cubic feet, “close contact” is now defined as sharing the same indoor airspace with a COVID-19 case for a cumulative total of 15 minutes or more over a 24-hour period during the COVID-19 case’s infectious period.
    • For indoor airspaces of greater than 400,000 cubic feet, “close contact” is defined as being within six feet of a COVID-19 case for a cumulative total of 15 minutes or more over a 24-hour period during the COVID-19 case’s infectious period.
  • “Exposed group” is clarified to include employer-provided transportation and employees residing within employer-provided housing that are covered by the COVID-19 Prevention standards.

California’s DIR Releases Pay Scale Disclosure FAQs

December 30th, 2022

The California Equal Pay Act prohibits an employer from paying its employees less than that of the opposite sex for equal work. Equal Pay Act mandates were strengthened with the signing of the California Fair Pay Act (SB 1162) which, starting January 1, 2023, will require employers to disclose additional pay data, provide pay ranges for posted positions and increase pay transparency for applicants and employees. As discussed here, the statute also extends record retention requirements for wage and other employment related records from two to three years.

The newly released FAQs provide clarification as to which employers are subject to pay disclosure requirements, content requirements for mandatory disclosures and how the statute applies to remote postings.

Employers should begin company-wide revisions to all job descriptions to include pay scale information. This will assure all job postings include the required pay information and will make it easier to provide pay information when requested by current employees. Record retention policies should also be revised to ensure pay transparency records are maintained in accordance with new statutory requirements.

Updated Workplace Postings for 2023

December 30th, 2022

State and federal law require employers to meet workplace posting obligations. What must be posted depends on many factors including the number of employees, nature and location of the employer’s business, annual dollar volume, whether the employer is a federal contractor, and in certain instances the employer’s industry.

Posting requirements vary by statute which means not all employers will be subject to each posting requirement. Posters must be conspicuously placed in an area of the workplace frequented by employees throughout the workday.

In California, due to the decrease in the number of workers frequenting the workplace—and a corresponding increase in the number of remote workers—employers are now allowed, “in any instance in which an employer is required to physically post information, [to] also distribute that information to employees by email with the document or documents attached.”[1] It is important for employers to note that the ability to provide notice through electronic distribution does not eliminate the employer’s obligation to physically display required postings within its existing workspace.

As discussed here, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s Know Your Rights: Workplace Discrimination is Illegal poster has been updated for 2023. Below is a list of eight California mandated posting and two pamphlets that will be updating for 2023[i]:

Posters:

  1. California Minimum Wage
  2. Family Care and Medical Leave and Pregnancy Disability Leave
  3. Your Rights and Obligations as a Pregnant Employee
  4. California Law Prohibits Workplace Discrimination and Harassment
  5. Transgender Rights in the Workplace
  6. Know Your Rights; Workplace Discrimination is Illegal
  7. Your Rights Under the USERRA
  8. Safety and Health Protection on the Job (Cal/OSHA)

Pamphlets: 

  1. Unemployment Insurance
  2. EEOC

[1]             Cal. Lab. Code Section 1207


[i] Listing provided by Robert Roy Ventura County Agricultural Association; President/General Counsel’s email message (12/21/2022).

WG Legal Insights E-Newsletter Top 10 Articles of 2022: A Year in Review

December 30th, 2022

It’s been an eventful year in the world of employment law! As 2022 draws to a close we took the opportunity to put together a Top Ten list of some of our most popular articles of the year; we hope you enjoy!

  1. Farm Labor Survey Shows H-2A Wage Increase for 2023
  2. Card Check Bill AB 2183 Heads to California Assembly Floor
  3. New 2022 Meal Charge and Reimbursement Rates for H-2A Workers
  4. Ag Employers: Prepare Now for Union Card Check Law
  5. Litigation Update: California’s Statutory Arbitration Ban (AB 51)
  6. Governor Gavin Newson Signs AB 2183, Guts Secret Ballot Process for Farmworkers
  7. CanSino CONVIDECIA Vaccine Approved for H-2A Workers
  8. DOL Introduces New FLC and FLCE Registration Forms
  9. Clear the Exits! Locked or Blocked Emergency Exits Can Cost You
  10. Colorado’s New FAMLI Program Takes Effect January 1, 2023

Voices of the Valley: Carl Casale of Ospraie Ag Science on Doing More With Less

December 6th, 2022

Carl Casale, Senior Agricultural Partner at Ospraie Ag Science, joins the podcast to talk about his company’s overarching goal in venture capital: to produce more high-quality food with less impact on the environment.

“By 2030, half the world’s population is going to be middle class or wealthy and the other half of the population is going to have the same issue of needing more calories to meet their basic needs,” he says. “But for half the population – they aren’t going to need more calories, but they are going to care deeply about how those calories are produced.”

To that end, Carl is exploring the potential for biologicals, biopesticides, soil testing and management that will allow ag to adapt to consumer preference and global regulations. But the bar for innovators in these fields has gotten higher this year, he says.

“What we’re seeing as investors is that we’re immediately learning what’s good and what’s not,” Carl says. “Before, if there were 100 companies in a given space, the top 75 would get funded just because they’re along for the ride. Now you better be in the top quartile or you’re not getting any money. It’s the separation of the wheat from the chaff right now.”

Click here to listen to the latest episode of Voices of the Valley.