President Trump Revokes California’s Clean Air Waivers

June 12th, 2025

On Thursday, President Trump signed three resolutions that collectively revoke federal Clean Air Act waivers that had previously been granted to California.

The federal Clean Air Act gives California the unique ability to set its own air emissions standards, provided it receives a waiver of preemption from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In recent years, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) had received several waivers to allow its ambitious electric vehicle transition plans to move forward.

Earlier this year, Congress utilized the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn the waivers. H.J.Res 87, H.J.Res 88 and H.J.Res 89 target the Advanced Clean Trucks (ACT) regulation, the Advanced Clean Cars II regulation and the Omnibus Low-NOx Emissions rule, respectively.

The ACT rule in particular set zero emission vehicle (ZEV) manufacturing and sales goals by 2045 and was expected to work in tandem with the Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) rule, which mandated the transition from diesel to ZEVs, including trucks. However, CARB withdrew its request for an ACF waiver earlier this year. As of this writing, ACF implementation is not moving forward, nor is the zero-emission forklift rule, for which a waiver request was never submitted. That said, CARB has issued guidance indicating its commitment to maintaining current operations.

It should be noted that the action taken by Congress continues to be debated – specifically whether federal waivers can actually be subjected to Congress oversight under the CRA. Litigation is therefore possible.

For more information, please email Tracey Chow, Federal Government Affairs Director, at [email protected] or Matthew Allen, VP of State Government Affairs, at [email protected].

DIR Director Katie Hagen Resigns After Five-Year Tenure

June 13th, 2025

According to Cal/OSHA Reporter, Katie Hagen has resigned from her position as Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), effective July 2025. Hagen will be departing for the private sector to assume the role of CEO at CPS HR Consulting, a Sacramento-based firm that serves public agencies and nonprofit organizations nationwide. 

Hagen’s departure marks the end of a five-year term that began in March 2020 under Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration, coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Her time at DIR has been described by internal sources as marked by operational challenges, including long-standing issues with hiring and staffing. According to Cal/OSHA Reporter, managers cited the state’s complicated hiring processes as a barrier to fulfilling DIR’s mission, particularly in key enforcement agencies like Cal/OSHA. 

Remote Workers and the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Data Collection

June 13th, 2025

Employers are reminded as discussed here that the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection is now open and that the deadline to file is Tuesday, June 24, 2025 

Since 1966, the EEOC has required employers to submit workforce demographic data (EEO-1  

Component 1) on an annual basis. Private employers with 100 or more employees and federal contractors with 50 or more employees and that meet certain criteria are required to report annually the number of individuals they employ by job category and by sex and race or ethnicity. 

For some employers, the rise in remote and hybrid work scenarios has added a layer of complexity to the reporting process. To ensure accurate reporting when it comes to remote and hybrid employees, employers should keep the following in mind:  

  • Employees who work remotely must be included in an employer’s EEO-1 Component 1 report(s) by the specific establishment to which the employees report. Under no circumstances should an employee’s home address be considered an “establishment” to be reported on any EEO-1 Component 1 submission or report. 
  • The temporary closure of a physical work site will normally not affect how employees are counted on the EEO-1 Component 1 report. Employees who continue to be assigned to or report to a physical location should be included in the report for that specific location. 
  • If a remote employee is not assigned to and does not report to any physical location on a permanent basis, the employee should be counted at the establishment to which the employee’s manager reports or is assigned. If neither the employee nor the manager reports to an establishment, they should be included on the employer’s “Headquarters Report”. 
  • If an employer operates entirely remotely and does not have any physical locations, the employer should report the address where the business is legally registered, such as a Post Office box, in lieu of a physical address. 

Employers are encouraged to review their reporting procedures and ensure that all relevant employees are accurately included in their EEO-1 Component 1 report(s).  

Visit the dedicated EEO-1 Component 1 website at www.eeocdata.org/eeo1 to access the EEO-1 Component 1 Online Filing System (OFS) and to find supplementary resource materials such as the 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Instruction Booklet, FAQ’s, the2024 EEO-1 Component 1 Data File Upload Specifications and to get the latest EEO-1 updates.   

Employers needing additional assistance can also access the Filer Support Team Message Center upon logging into the OFS. 

Get Ready for ICE: Essential Tips for Mitigating Risk 

June 13th, 2025

In today’s climate, it’s crucial for employers to be prepared for potential visits from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Understanding the difference between audits and raids, knowing the penalties for non-compliance, and having a structured process in place can help mitigate risks and ensure compliance. This article provides essential tips for employers to navigate these challenging situations. 

Understanding Audits vs. Raids 

An audit is a planned inspection initiated through a Notice of Inspection (NOI), typically giving employers three days to comply. In contrast, a raid is an immediate inspection initiated through a valid warrant, which can result in detentions or confiscation of documents. Both scenarios require employers to be prepared and knowledgeable about their rights and responsibilities. 

Penalties for Non-Compliance 

Employers must be aware of the severe penalties for Form I-9 violations. Civil penalties can reach up to $2,789 per form, while knowingly hiring unauthorized workers can lead to fines of up to $27,894 for repeat offenders. Criminal penalties are even more severe, with managers and business owners facing up to 10 years in prison and fines up to $250,000 for actions considered “harboring” unauthorized workers. 

Form I-9 Compliance 

All employers must verify that every person hired is eligible to work in the U.S. This involves using the most up-to-date Form I-9, viewing documentation that establishes identity and work authorization, and ensuring that the documents “reasonably appear authentic.” Employers should create a structured, easily repeatable process and train HR staff to avoid errors. 

Preparing for an ICE Visit 

Employers should educate all employees on their rights; provide “Know Your Rights” cards in both English and Spanish and designate a response team to handle interactions with ICE agents. It’s important to develop an internal protocol for immediate response, including instructions for securing premises, reviewing warrants and ensuring legal counsel review before complying with document requests. 

During an ICE Visit 

The employer’s point person should be the only individual doing all the communicating and being responsible for staying calm (instructing everyone else to do the same), contacting management and legal counsel and establishing validity by verifying the warrant and identity of agents. The point person should also be the one accompanying agents during the visit and making a record of events while making sure they are not interfering in the process.  

Post-Visit Actions 

After an ICE visit, employers should prepare a detailed report of the visit, ensure detained employees are connected with legal counsel, their families informed and supported, and offer support to alleviate post-visit anxiety. Working with legal counsel to address any compliance issues raised during the visit can help mitigate risks of fines or penalties. 

By understanding the differences between audits and raids, being aware of the penalties for non-compliance, and having a structured process in place, employers can better prepare for potential ICE visits. Educating employees, designating a response team, and taking appropriate post-visit actions are essential steps in mitigating risks and ensuring compliance.

Specialty Crops Grateful for Vital Investments in U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee’s Reconciliation Draft

June 12th, 2025

WASHINGTON, D.C. (June 12, 2025) – The Specialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance (SCFBA) issued the following statement today reacting to the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry’s release of legislative text for the budget reconciliation package.

“We are grateful to Chairman Boozman and his staff for advancing these vital investments in specialty crops that the Specialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance has been proposing since 2023.

“Our message today is simple: any Congressional investment in American agriculture must include specialty crops. America’s specialty crop growers confront a host of unprecedented challenges. Rising input costs, limited access to labor, unfair trade practices, disruptions to foreign markets, and natural disasters ranging from flood to drought all impede the competitiveness of these family farms. Nothing short of the survival of our domestic industry is at stake.

“These investments, already passed by the House of Representatives, are a key piece of the puzzle to help America’s specialty crop growers succeed. There is still work to be done though. Senate rules prohibit the inclusion of some innovative policy initiatives we proposed, such as investments in mechanization and automation, and reforms to crop insurance to provide many of our growers with an affordable and effective safety net for the first time.

“We commend the Senate Agriculture Committee for recognizing that our growers domestically produce the safe, nutritious foods that more Americans should be consuming, as well as cultivate the trees, flowers and plants that play a vital role in the nation’s health and wellbeing. We stand ready to work with Congress to enact a comprehensive, bipartisan farm bill that invests in America’s specialty crop growers.”

The SCFBA is co-chaired by Cathy Burns, CEO of the International Fresh Produce Association; Mike Joyner, President of the Florida Fruit & Vegetable Association; Dave Puglia, President and CEO of Western Growers; and Kam Quarles, CEO of the National Potato Council.

# SCFBA #

The Specialty Crop Farm Bill Alliance is a national coalition of more than 150 organizations representing growers of fruits, vegetables, dried fruit, tree nuts, nursery plants and other products. The Alliance was established to enhance the competitiveness of specialty crop agriculture and improve the health of Americans by broadening the scope of U.S. agricultural public policy. For more information, visit farmbillalliance.com.


MEDIA CONTACTS: 

Christina Morton, Florida Fruit & Vegetable Association, [email protected]

Sarah Gonzalez, International Fresh Produce Association, [email protected]

Mark Szymanski, National Potato Council, [email protected]

Ann Donahue, Western Growers, [email protected]

Best Practices: Does Your Handbook Need a Refresh?

June 13th, 2025

Rapid evolution of the workplace in recent years has left many Human Resources (HR) policies outdated. Maintaining outdated policies in your employee handbook not only poses a risk of legal non-compliance but can also adversely affect employee morale, productivity, and retention. Outlined below are several common HR policy areas that may need updating to align with current standards: 

  • Remote and Hybrid Work Policies: 
    • Your organization, like many others, likely initiated remote and hybrid work arrangements during and after the COVID pandemic. However, it is common for these arrangements to remain informal, with HR policies not fully reflecting current operating protocols. A robust hybrid and remote work policy should clearly define eligibility criteria, expectations for availability and responsiveness, responsibilities for equipment and associated costs, as well as health and safety obligations for home offices. 
  • Social Media’s Impact on the Workplace: 
    • Current trends in social media usage have the potential to obscure the distinction between an employee’s personal and professional identities. Modern social media policies should emphasize guidelines regarding the use of company branding in personal posts, as well as address the repercussions for sharing confidential information or offensive content that could result in cyberbullying and harassment of co-workers on digital platforms. Educating employees on how online conduct can negatively impact the workplace is essential for any modern social media policy.  
  • Harassment and Violence Prevention: 
    • California’s anti-harassment mandates have long required employers to maintain anti-harassment policies. However, many of these policies have not been revisited or updated since before the COVID-19 pandemic and the shift to remote and hybrid work environments. As workplaces increasingly adopt these new work arrangements, it is essential that handbook policies are updated to address emerging forms of harassing conduct, such as cyberbullying via messaging platforms and exclusionary practices in virtual meetings. 
    • Unfortunately, workplace violence is an increasingly prevalent issue that requires an employer’s attention. To remain legally compliant, a modern employee handbook should incorporate updates in legislation concerning workplace violence prevention. Such updates should include explicit complaint procedures, a detailed outline of investigation steps and timelines, and proactive strategies such as regular training sessions and anonymous reporting mechanisms.
  • Technology Use and BYOD (Bring Your Own Device): 
    • With the increasing use of personal devices to conduct company business, modern HR policies should focus on clearly defining acceptable use, security requirements, and responsibilities for maintaining and protecting company data on personal devices. 
    • A well-defined acceptable use policy is essential for any BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) strategy. BYOD policies should address key issues such as accessing company systems, sharing data, following security protocols, and maintaining professional conduct. With numerous advancements in data security, even simple measures such as restricting access to sensitive company applications on personal devices can significantly reduce risk.  

Modernizing HR policies is a crucial step in adapting to an ever-evolving workplace landscape. With shifts toward remote and hybrid work, advancements in technology, and changing societal dynamics, up-to-date policies ensure legal compliance, safeguard employee well-being, and enhance organizational resilience.  

Are you ready to modernize your HR policies and prepare your organization for the evolving workplace?  

We invite you to learn more about the Western Growers University (WGU) Employee Handbook Workshop, tentatively scheduled for November 2025. Attendees will leave the Workshop with a completed and customized legally compliant Employee Handbook ready to distribute to your organization’s employees!  

Sign up today to receive updates and secure your spot once registration opens!

Justices Reject Heightened Bar for Reverse Discrimination Plaintiffs 

June 5th, 2025

In a unanimous decision issued June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court held that employees who allege discrimination, including so-called “reverse discrimination,” are entitled to equal treatment under federal law. The Court reversed a Sixth Circuit ruling that had imposed a heightened pleading standard on a heterosexual woman claiming sex-based discrimination in a state agency’s promotion and demotion decisions. 

The plaintiff, Marlean Ames, alleged that the Ohio Department of Youth Services discriminated against her based on her sexual orientation when it denied her a promotion and later demoted her. Ames, who is heterosexual, was demoted and passed over for a promotion that was instead given to a lesbian colleague. A gay man was later appointed to her former role. The Sixth Circuit had dismissed her claim on the ground that majority-group plaintiffs must show “background circumstances” suggesting the employer is one that discriminates against the majority—an extra hurdle not required of minority plaintiffs. 

Writing for the Court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson rejected this reasoning, explaining that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals from intentional discrimination, regardless of majority or minority status. At the early stage of a discrimination case, plaintiffs need only show they were qualified, rejected, and that the surrounding circumstances give rise to an inference of discrimination. 

The Court reaffirmed the standard framework used in employment discrimination cases—known as the McDonnell Douglas test—where plaintiffs must first make a basic showing of discrimination, after which the burden shifts to the employer to give a legitimate reason, and then back to the plaintiff to prove pretext. However, the Court emphasized that this test applies equally to all individuals and cannot be modified based on the plaintiff’s group status. 

In a concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, questioned the legitimacy of the McDonnell Douglas framework altogether, calling it textually unsupported and overly complex. Though the majority did not address that issue, Thomas signaled openness to revisiting the framework in a future case. 

What does it mean

The decision confirms that anti-discrimination laws apply equally to all employees. Employers should apply consistent, nondiscriminatory criteria to employment decisions and be prepared to defend them regardless of the identity of the affected employee. Courts may no longer apply heightened pleading standards solely because the plaintiff is a member of a majority group. 

Join the 2025 Center for Produce Safety Research Symposium

June 10th, 2025

The 2025 Center for Produce Safety (CPS) Symposium is set to take place next week in La Jolla, Calif., on June 18 and 19. This event will bring together researchers and industry leaders to discuss research findings and advancements in produce safety. The symposium will feature:

  • 11 final research reports
    • (Previous year reports and posters can be accessed in the CPS website)
  • 23 interim research updates
  • Four master classes covering crucial topics including:
    • Log Reduction Use, abuse, and how to de-mystify it – Dr. Martin Wiedmann
    • The Truth of n60 Sampling – Dr. Michelle Danyluk
    • Agricultural Water Sampling – Dr. Channah Rock
    • Brushes: Challenges and Opportunities – Dr. Claire Murphy
  • Industry panels offering actionable takeaways to fuel change

We are proud to have our Western Growers Science team actively participating in the symposium:

  • De Ann Davis, SVP of Science, will be a panelist for the project: A viability assay for Cyclospora and its surrogates Eimeria.
  • Joelle Mosso, AVP of Science Programs, will lead the discussion for the project: Flexible risk process models to quantify residual risks and the impact of interventions.

Don’t miss this opportunity to engage with leading experts and gain valuable insights. Register here.

Key learnings from last year’s symposium can be found here.

Western Growers Advocacy Helps Defeat PAGA Workaround Bill

June 5th, 2025

SB 310 (Wiener), a bill that would have undermined California’s recent bipartisan reforms to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), has been moved to the Senate’s Inactive File and will not advance this session. June 6 marks the Legislature’s “house of origin” deadline—the last day for a bill to pass out of the chamber in which it was introduced. With SB 310 stalled in the Senate, the bill is effectively dead for 2025. 

Western Growers, in close coordination with a broad coalition of allied organizations, played a key role in defeating this harmful legislation. Through direct advocacy and strategic engagement, we successfully persuaded legislators to withhold support for the bill and allow it to expire without a floor vote. 

SB 310 sought to create a new standalone private right of action to recover Labor Code Section 210 penalties—bypassing the penalty caps, expanded cure provisions, and early resolution processes adopted last year in SB 92 (Umberg) and AB 2288 (Kalra). Those landmark 2024 reforms were designed to protect responsible employers from abusive PAGA lawsuits while preserving workers’ rights to pursue legitimate claims. SB 310 would have circumvented those guardrails and exposed employers—regardless of their compliance efforts—to a new wave of litigation. 

Western Growers thanks our members who contacted their legislators and voiced opposition to SB 310. Your engagement made a difference. We will continue to monitor and defend against efforts to erode the integrity of the PAGA reform package and remain committed to protecting agricultural employers from unwarranted legal harassment and exposure. 

DIR Director Katie Hagen Resigns After Five-Year Tenure

June 5th, 2025

According to Cal/OSHA Reporter, Katie Hagen has resigned from her position as Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), effective July 2025. Hagen will be departing for the private sector to assume the role of CEO at CPS HR Consulting, a Sacramento-based firm that serves public agencies and nonprofit organizations nationwide. 

Hagen’s departure marks the end of a five-year term that began in March 2020 under Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration, coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Her time at DIR has been described by internal sources as marked by operational challenges, including long-standing issues with hiring and staffing. According to Cal/OSHA Reporter, managers cited the state’s complicated hiring processes as a barrier to fulfilling DIR’s mission, particularly in key enforcement agencies like Cal/OSHA. 

Best Practices: Does Your Handbook Need a Refresh?

June 5th, 2025

Rapid evolution of the workplace in recent years has left  many Human Resources (HR) policies outdated. Maintaining outdated policies in your employee handbook not only poses a risk of legal non-compliance but can also adversely affect employee morale, productivity, and retention. Outlined below are several common HR policy areas that may need updating to align with current standards: 

  • Remote and Hybrid Work Policies: 
    • Your organization, like many others, likely initiated remote and hybrid work arrangements during and after the COVID pandemic. However, it is common for these arrangements to remain informal, with HR policies not fully reflecting current operating protocols. A robust hybrid and remote work policy should clearly define eligibility criteria, expectations for availability and responsiveness, responsibilities for equipment and associated costs, as well as health and safety obligations for home offices. 
  • Social Media’s Impact on the Workplace: 
    • Current trends in social media usage have the potential to obscure the distinction between an employee’s personal and professional identities. Modern social media policies should emphasize guidelines regarding the use of company branding in personal posts, as well as address the repercussions for sharing confidential information or offensive content that could result in cyberbullying and harassment of co-workers on digital platforms. Educating employees on how online conduct can negatively impact the workplace is essential for any modern social media policy.  
  • Harassment and Violence Prevention: 
    • California’s anti-harassment mandates have long required employers to maintain anti-harassment policies. However, many of these policies have not been revisited or updated since before the COVID-19 pandemic and the shift to remote and hybrid work environments. As workplaces increasingly adopt these new work arrangements, it is essential that handbook policies are updated to address emerging forms of harassing conduct, such as cyberbullying via messaging platforms and exclusionary practices in virtual meetings. 
    • Unfortunately, workplace violence is an increasingly prevalent issue that requires an employer’s attention. To remain legally compliant, a modern employee handbook should incorporate updates in legislation concerning workplace violence prevention. Such updates should include explicit complaint procedures, a detailed outline of investigation steps and timelines, and proactive strategies such as regular training sessions and anonymous reporting mechanisms.i 
  • Technology Use and BYOD (Bring Your Own Device): 
    • With the increasing use of personal devices to conduct company business, modern HR policies should focus on clearly defining acceptable use, security requirements, and responsibilities for maintaining and protecting company data on personal devices. 
    • A well-defined acceptable use policy is essential for any BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) strategy. BYOD policies should address key issues such as accessing company systems, sharing data, following security protocols, and maintaining professional conduct. With numerous advancements in data security, even simple measures such as restricting access to sensitive company applications on personal devices can significantly reduce risk.  

Modernizing HR policies is a crucial step in adapting to an ever-evolving workplace landscape. With shifts toward remote and hybrid work, advancements in technology, and changing societal dynamics, up-to-date policies ensure legal compliance, safeguard employee well-being, and enhance organizational resilience.  

Are you ready to modernize your HR policies and prepare your organization for the evolving workplace?  

We invite you to learn more about the Western Growers University (WGU) Employee Handbook Workshop, tentatively scheduled for November 2025. Attendees will leave the Workshop with a completed and customized legally compliant Employee Handbook ready to distribute to your organization’s employees!  

Sign up today to receive updates and secure your spot once registration opens!

Cal/OSHA Updates its Draft Workplace Violence Prevention Regulation

June 5th, 2025

Under SB 553, California’s Workplace Violence Prevention statute, Cal/OSHA is required to develop and submit a workplace violence prevention standard to the Cal/OSHA Standards Board by December 31, 2025. Subsequently, the Standards Board must adopt this standard no later than December 31, 2026 

In compliance with this mandate, Cal/OSHA revised its initial draft regulation on workplace violence and opened it for public comment period that concluded on September 3, 2024. The agency conducted its first open discussion on the amended draft during an all-day advisory committee meeting on January 24, 2025. Between January and May 2025, the agency conducted a second round of edits to the Revised Discussion Draft regulation and is now seeking additional input. Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to Deputy Chief of Health Eric Berg, [email protected] by July 14, 2025 

What Does it Mean 

The status of the revised draft regulations has not changed. In alignment with regulatory administrative procedures, the revision process is expected to continue throughout this year, with an anticipated Standard’s Board final vote by late 2026. 

In the interim, employers should continue to monitor Cal/OSHA’s progress, review current workplace violence prevention plans and training programs to ensure they align with SB 553, and be prepared for new/updated requirements. 

The Reservoir and Tanimura & Antle Dedicate 40 Acres to Accelerate AgTech Innovation in Salinas Valley

June 5th, 2025

Reservoir Farms On-Farm Technology Incubator Connects Salinas Farmland and Silicon Valley

 The Reservoir, a California company developing a new system for agricultural technology innovation, has secured a long-term lease for Reservoir Farms, its nonprofit on-farm startup incubator, on 40 acres of farmland in Salinas, California, in partnership with Tanimura & Antle, one of America’s most respected family-owned produce growers. This strategic collaboration marks a major milestone in building the first Reservoir Farms location into a world-class hub for scalable, farmer-driven technology solutions.

Located at the historical and iconic corner of Highway 68 and Hitchcock Road in Salinas, this farmland has been cultivated for specialty crops like strawberries, leafy greens, and vegetables, making it an ideal foundation for Reservoir Farms’ mission to innovate at the intersection of agriculture and technology.

Owned by the Tanimura family, this farmland is situated minutes from downtown Salinas, 60 miles south of Silicon Valley and surrounded by some of the nation’s most productive specialty crop acreage, well positioned to become a living laboratory for the development, testing, and demonstration of next-generation agtech solutions. Reservoir Farms will leverage this site to incubate startups, pilot robotics and automation technologies, and foster sustainable agricultural practices-providing a real-world proving ground that bridges the gap between invention and adoption.

“Partnering with Tanimura & Antle to secure this exceptional farmland ensures Reservoir Farms can serve as the launchpad for the next generation of agtech – bringing together growers, technologists, and the community to tackle the most pressing challenges facing our food system,” said Danny Bernstein, founder and CEO of the Reservoir. “Thanks to the partnership with the Tanimura family, agtech innovation can be directly connected to farmland, accelerating our ability to deliver real-world solutions. Since announcing Reservoir Farms with Western Growers, the overwhelming interest from startups and consistent industry collaboration underscores how pressing and essential the nature of this work.”

Brian Antle and Danny Bernstein stand together in the heart of Salinas Valley, dedicating a new chapter of innovation as Reservoir Farms’ on-farm incubator launches-where agricultural tradition meets the future of agtech.

Developed in partnership with Western Growers, Reservoir Farms is a new nonprofit, on-farm startup incubator that helps agricultural robotics and automation companies develop, test, and scale breakthrough technologies directly in working farm environments. It’s designed to close the gap between promising prototypes and real-world deployment, accelerating solutions to generational challenges in agriculture while supporting inclusive rural economic development.

The initiative will initially allocate 10 acres of land for dedicated test plots, providing startups with the opportunity to innovate in crop cultivation, including at least five for strawberries and five for leafy greens and vegetables. Plantings will follow a staggered schedule to optimize growth and research. Additionally, expanded plot sizes will be available to accommodate startups and projects as operations scale.

Built for Innovation from the Ground Up

The combination of state-of-the-art shop spaces and expansive multi-crop farmland for R&D opens unique opportunities for startups and established firms to partner directly with growers, test and improve technologies in real-world settings, and bring products to market faster.

“Tanimura & Antle has long been committed to sustainable agricultural production and today, achieving that goal requires access to cutting-edge innovation. As a company rooted in innovation, we’re proud to partner with the Reservoir to help bridge the gap between technologists and growers. By opening access to select acreage, we aim to accelerate advancements that drive productivity, profitability, and long-term sustainability for California farms and beyond,” said Brian Antle, Executive Vice President of Sales at Tanimura & Antle.

Reservoir Farms is committed to:

  • Empower Local Farmers: Providing hands-on access to the latest AgTech innovations, helping them address labor shortages, reduce input costs, and improve crop yields.
  • Strengthen the AgTech Industry: Supporting over 50 new companies within five years.
  • Boost the Local Economy: Creating over 500 new jobs for Salinas Valley residents and fostering workforce development in high-tech agriculture.
  • Promote Sustainability: Advancing solutions that improve farmer economics, water efficiency, soil health, and environmental stewardship across the region.

“This initiative reinforces the region’s role as a leader in agricultural innovation while addressing critical challenges in food security, environmental sustainability, and rural economic development,” said Bernstein.

The groundbreaking of Reservoir Farmsin Salinas is planned for late summer 2025.

About the Reservoir: The Reservoir is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit building tech incubators for California’s future. Founded in 2024, the Reservoir creates spaces where startups, researchers, organizations, and corporations can develop and test innovations beyond Silicon Valley, focusing on rural areas like the Central and Salinas Valleys. The Reservoir drives economic growth, workforce development, and environmental resilience across California’s agricultural heartlands. Learn more at www.thersvr.org.

Contact Details

Jennifer Goldston

[email protected]

Company Website

https://reservoir.co/

Federal Court Sets July 1 Hearing in AEWR Lawsuit Challenging DOL Wage Rule

June 4th, 2025

A federal judge has scheduled a long-awaited hearing in a high-stakes legal challenge to the U.S. Department of Labor’s 2023 methodology for setting Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWR) for H-2A workers. The lawsuit, brought by the National Council of Agricultural Employers (NCAE)—of which Western Growers is a member—alongside several Florida-based agricultural organizations, seeks to roll back the 2023 AEWR rule and enjoin its nationwide application.

U.S. District Judge Charlene Honeywell set oral arguments for July 1, 2025, in Tampa, Florida, after rejecting a third request by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to delay the proceedings. DOJ had previously sought pauses to allow new leadership at the Department of Labor (DOL) to evaluate its position on the rule. The court had already granted two extensions—first for 60 days, then another 30. In its latest request, DOJ sought an additional 90-day delay, which the court denied.

The 2023 AEWR rule significantly increased required wage rates in several key agricultural states. California currently holds the highest AEWR in the contiguous United States at $19.97 per hour. Washington and Oregon follow closely behind at $19.82, while states like Idaho are set at $16.83.

The lawsuit challenges the methodology used by DOL to establish AEWRs, particularly its reliance on the USDA’s Farm Labor Survey (FLS) as well as other data sources not limited to field or crop-specific work. Plaintiffs argue that DOL’s use of broader occupational wage data—including pay rates for truck drivers and frontline supervisors—unfairly inflates H-2A wage requirements beyond the scope of traditional farm labor.

In addition to wage calculations, the lawsuit disputes DOL’s interpretation of employers’ housing obligations. While federal regulations require H-2A employers to “furnish” housing, DOL interprets this to mean housing must be provided free of charge. The plaintiffs argue this interpretation lacks statutory basis and that the value of employer-provided housing should be factored into the total compensation package, not excluded from wage calculations.

The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a nationwide injunction to revert AEWRs back to 2023 levels, contending that the current rule has placed unsustainable financial burdens on farm employers without adequate legal justification. Both sides have filed summary judgment motions, which will be argued before Judge Honeywell during the July 1 hearing.

National Cantaloupe Food Safety Guidelines: Open Comment Period Webinar

June 3rd, 2025

Western Growers invites you for a webinar on June 12th at 11:00 AM PT to review the comments submitted during the open comment period for the draft National Guidance Document—focused on growing, harvesting and post-harvest packing shed activities. This will be an opportunity to provide feedback and to hear from those that submitted comments.

We look forward to your input as we work together to build practical, science-based guidance for cantaloupe food safety.

If you have any questions, please reach out to Sonia Salas ([email protected]) or Gustavo Reyes ([email protected]).

Webinar details
Date: June 12, 2025
Time: 11:00 AM
Location: Online/Zoom

Register here