Last Chance: Contribute to WG’s 2026 Compensation and Benefits Survey by May 4 for a Free Copy of Report

April 14th, 2026

Where does meaningful compensation data in agriculture come from? It starts with you.

The 2026 Western Growers Compensation and Benefits Survey is still open for Western Growers member companies to contribute their compensation data. The last day to do this is Monday, May 4.

All members who participate in the survey will not only receive a free copy but will also be entered to win a coveted Western Growers Stanley mug.

Benefits of Participation

Western Growers invites agricultural employers and organizations to actively contribute their own workforce data in a collaborative approach that makes the survey both dynamic and highly relevant to the industry it serves. Unlike traditional reports, the Western Growers Compensation and Benefits Survey is built on the fundamental model of industry participation for the most accurate and real-time data.

How it Works

The Compensation and Benefits Survey is a survey built by the industry, for the industry—a survey driven by its participants. Participating organizations submit key data points about their workforce, such as job titles, geographic region, base salary and incentive pay. The more organizations that contribute, the more accurate and representative the data becomes.

The information is then aggregated, validated and anonymized to create a comprehensive view of compensation trends across the ag industry. The result? A dataset that reflects real-world conditions, not estimated figures.

All submitted information will remain completely confidential and will not be associated with any specific organization. The data is captured, analyzed and compiled by Industry Insights, a third-party partner. All data is valid and reliable and distributed in the aggregate.

The Western Growers Compensation and Benefits Survey is the only one of its kind in the agriculture industry.

Contribute today! For more information, visit AgSalary.com, or email Karen Timmins, SVP of Human Resources, at [email protected].

USDA-Backed AMP Program Offers New Opportunities for Growers

April 14th, 2026

Elevated Foods is a grower-first food and agriculture platform based in California that administers a USDA-backed grant program called the Advancing Markets for Producers (AMP) grant. The program is designed to get real resources directly into growers’ hands with minimal reporting burden. Enrolled specialty crop growers receive $10,000 at contract signing plus $250/acre in the first year, in exchange for committing to at least one soil conservation practice – cover cropping, reduced tillage, NRCS-approved nutrient management, soil carbon amendment (like composting), or hedgerows/field borders – along with soil sampling and reporting check-ins.

Beyond the grant, Elevated Foods works to connect growers to new market channels while providing support with sustainability metrics, compliance, data management and brand storytelling. Fruit & vegetable operations across California and Arizona are eligible. Interested growers can learn more and even complete the online questionnaire to get into the queue (limited spots) at elevatedfoods.com/pages/advancing-markets-for-producers, or reach out directly to Evan Storey with questions.

New Study Underscores the Importance of Environmental Salmonella Monitoring and its Significance within One Health  

April 14th, 2026

peer-reviewed article published in December 2025 in the Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology highlights the need for increased environmental surveillance for Salmonella to identify alternative reservoirs and transmission pathways. The publication is authored by scientists from the University of Georgia (UGA) and the Office of Laboratory Operations and Applied Science, Human Foods Program, FDA. 

The publication presents findings from a two-year (Nov 2021-Oct 2023) watershed Salmonella surveillance conducted across four watersheds in the Southeastern U.S. Briefly, the study assessed the prevalence of Salmonella in water samples (n=456) collected from 19 sites. For positive samples, Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) was used for serovar identification, diversity assessment and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. These sequences were further analyzed in phylogenetic studies using existing NCBI libraries for national food animal production. In addition, adjacent land-use and weather data were collected to examine the relationships between these variables and the microbiological findings.  

Key Findings: 

  • The Salmonella positivity rate was 69% (314/456), with prevalences ranging between 78% (112/144, Watershed C) and 63% (91/114, Watershed A), both watersheds adjacent to animal agriculture. 
  • A total of 37 serovars were identified, with the most common across all watersheds being Give I, Rubislaw, Montevideo II, and Rubislaw. Salmonella serovars significant for human health included Infantis, Typhimurium, Montevideo, Braenderup, Mississippi, Muenchen and Saintpaul. 
  •  The majority of serovars recovered from the water samples did not match the USDA-FSIS publicly available genomes for meat and poultry products (beef, chicken, pork and turkey), except for Infantis and Typhimurium (although they were genetically distinct from the NCBI), indicating that most of the serovars found in the watershed did not match those in the animal agriculture data, and suggesting the presence of additional Salmonella reservoirs beyond animal agricultural. 
  • Seasonality was reported as an important factor in Salmonella prevalence and diversity, with the highest prevalence observed in the spring months (93%, 106/144). Similarly, 94% of the serovars were detected in the same months. On the other hand, the lowest prevalence was observed in the summer months (47%, 54/114). 
  • Out of the 314 Salmonella-positives, 33 (11%) displayed antibiotic-resistance phenotypes, with 7(21%) being multidrug resistant. Antibiotics included, but were not limited to, streptomycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid, amoxicillin and gentamicin. 

  

Why these matters 

  • Salmonella serovars from wildlife are understudied, and as described in the study, multiple serovars might be introduced into water bodies via fecal contamination, where they may persist and subsequently contaminate irrigation sources used in produce production. This transmission pathway has been implicated in several produce-related outbreaks.  
  • According to the publication, 60-80% of salmonellosis cases are not linked to a known outbreak; meanwhile, 44% of domestic Salmonella illness is attributed to produce consumption, underscoring the role of environmental reservoirs and irrigation water as potential contamination routes. 
  • There are knowledge gaps in understanding Salmonella reservoirs in water sources. Increasing environmental surveillance, especially by expanding publicly available Salmonella genomes, could help identify outbreak strains faster and improve epidemiological traceback. Similar approaches have already proven useful in recreational water studies of Shiga toxin–producing E. coli (STEC), where characterizing the REP strain helped resolve outbreaks more effectively. 
  • Methodological disparities in water sampling need to be addressed because culture-based methods can yield limited results. This underscores the need for more robust tools to improve Salmonella population assessment within watersheds, such as an amplicon-based next-generation sequencing approach that profiles the relative frequencies of multiple Salmonella serovars in a single sample. 

The One Health approach: The publication encourages us to think “outside the box,” challenging our tendency to focus primarily on familiar serovars and well-known sources of contamination. This habitual approach can hinder our ability to detect emerging risks and fully understand the complexity of public health. It is important to view the environment and the dynamic system through different lenses to continue advancing food safety and protecting public health. The study highlights the importance of interdisciplinary approaches to tackling public health challenges, including integrating land use data, leveraging publicly available databases and strengthening environmental water surveillance.

Customs Sets Up Refund Process for Unlawful Trump Tariffs

April 13th, 2026

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has released details on a formal refund process for billions of dollars in tariffs imposed under the Trump administration following a February 2026 Supreme Court ruling that found the measures unlawful under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The first phase of its refund system will launch on April 20, 2026, with a new Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment Secure Data (ACE) Portal, which should simplify IEEPA duty refund requests.

CAPE will consolidate refunds of IEEPA duties including interest rather than processing refunds on an entry-by-entry basis. CBP plans to introduce CAPE in phases and will later add more functionality for more complicated scenarios, with the first phase limited to “certain unliquidated entries and certain entries within 80 days of liquidation.”

Those requesting IEEPA refunds will need to have accounts in the ACE Portal.

For more instructions, click here.

For additional background, watch this webinar.

CDFA Seeks Qualified Applicants for Advisory Committee

April 10th, 2026

The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) is seeking qualified applicants to apply for a seat on their Standardization Advisory Committee. The Committee is a 13‑member industry body that advises the CDFA on matters related to the Standardization Program, providing essential guidance on the standards, inspections and regulatory priorities affecting California’s fruit and vegetable commodities.

At this time, the committee only has four active members, leaving several commodity seats unrepresented. Current vacancies include:

  • 1 Fresh Fruit Member (oranges, other citrus fruit, table grapes)
  • 1 Other Fresh Fruit Member (other fresh fruit)
  • 4 Fresh Vegetable Members (broccoli, lettuce, tomatoes)
  • 2 Other Fresh Vegetable Members (other fresh vegetables)
  • 1 Other Commodity Member (subject to standardization assessments)

Prospective members must have a financial interest in the commodity they represent, either personally or through their employer. The committee meets twice a year, and remote participation is available.

To apply, you much complete the Prospective Member Appointment Questionnaire (PMAQ), obtain a letter of recommendation from an industry associate and submit both documents to the CDFA, through either of the following methods:

By Mail:

Attn: Sarah Cardoni

CA Dept. of Food & Agriculture

2399 Gateway Oaks Dr., Suite 200

Sacramento, CA, 95833

Electronically: Attach files to an email and send to [email protected].

Click here for more information.

OFLC Rescinds Nevada Prevailing Wage Rates

April 9th, 2026

Western Growers previously reported that Nevada’s prevailing wage for “Farm Labor, All Crops, All General Labor” was $16.63/hour (effective 9/25/2025). However, Nevada’s H-2A wage landscape recently changed. 

What changed 

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) rescinded Nevada’s prevailing wage survey rates on March 17, 2026and the Agricultural Online Wage Library (AOWL) now reflects Nevada’s previously-posted prevailing wages as “Rescinded 3/17/2026.”  

Who is affected 

According to OFLC’s notice timing, this change applies to all pending and newly submitted H-2A job orders and applications. Employers with already-certified H-2A applications should treat the rescission differently.  

Certified applications: keep paying the guaranteed rate 

For previously certified H-2A job orders/applications, employers must continue to pay at least the wage rate guaranteed on the certification, even if a later change would otherwise lower the required wage. This is consistent with the H-2A offered wage rules at 20 CFR 655.120(c)(4).  

Members with questions about Nevada H-2A wage rates or the H-2A program in general should contact the Western Growers H-2A Services Team. 

U.S OSHA Launches New ‘OSHA Cares’ Initiative

April 9th, 2026

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has launched a new safety initiative called OSHA Cares; an agency-wide effort focused on helping businesses meet federal workplace safety requirements. 

According to OSHA, through the OSHA Cares initiative, the agency hopes to empower employers to improve workplace safety – particularly small and medium-sized businesses who face unique safety and health challenges – by increasing access to OSHA experts and compliance assistance specialists; improving access to educational and training materials; and offering consistent workplace assistance during enforcement visits and meetings.  

This latest OSHA initiative encourages organizations to seek guidance to enhance safety and health within their workplaces. In line with this objective, the agency appears to be making a deliberate effort to present itself as more accessible by highlighting the advantages of seeking assistance or collaborating with OSHA. For instance, last month OSHA introduced an updated version of the poster employers are required to display in the workplace. In addition, the agency’s Directorate of Enforcement Programs has announced the pending launch of a new training program to assist in standardizing how the agency’s Compliance Safety and Health Officers will offer real time assistance during inspections and enforcement activities. 

For more information on the new OSHA Cares initiative, visit OSHA.gov. 

Updated H-2A Travel Subsistence and Meal Rates Effective April 7, 2026

April 9th, 2026

The U.S. Department of Labor has issued its annual update to allowable H-2A meal charges and travel-related subsistence reimbursement rates. These updates are effective April 7, 2026. 

For purposes of H-2A compliance, employers should take note of the following key figures: 

  • Minimum daily subsistence rate (no receipts): $16.78 per day 
  • Maximum daily subsistence rate (with receipts): $68.00 per day 

The minimum daily rate aligns with the updated maximum allowable meal charge. Employers are not required to reimburse above this amount unless the worker provides receipts. 

Where receipts are provided, employers must reimburse reasonable subsistence costs up to the standard federal CONUS meals and incidental expenses rate of $68.00 per day. 

These rates apply to both inbound and outbound travel, consistent with existing H-2A requirements that employers reimburse reasonable transportation and subsistence costs once applicable regulatory thresholds are met. 

Employers should ensure payroll and reimbursement practices are updated accordingly to remain compliant. 

Members with questions about the updated reimbursement rates or the H-2A program in general should contact the Western Growers H-2A Services Team. 

What Leadership Needs to Know: Not All Food Safety Programs Reduce Risk

April 8th, 2026

A common issue that comes up in food safety discussions, especially in boardrooms and C-suites, is how do we argue for better than compliance food safety? While it is true that not all food safety programs are compliant, many are, but the most critical piece is that while most programs will pass an audit for compliance, many won’t prevent an outbreak. 

Frequently in the food industry, food safety teams are provided with an annual budget, usually determined by non-food safety personnel. This budget covers everything from personnel to equipment improvements to testing expenses. These budgets help ensure the company remains in compliance with regulations and meets customer requirements. But as often occurs with our own personal budgets, there are concessions. Items that go onto the “nice to have” list instead of the “must have” list. 

What happens when the food safety budget doesn’t align with the needs? Or when food safety expertise argues with those holding the purse strings that more aggressive or expensive techniques, processes and services are needed? How is the decision made? What evidence can a food safety professional provide to prove the point? 

One place to start is a commonly discussed topic, the often vague and frequently used concept of “risk.” While food safety usually comes down to whether someone will get ill, it is also important to talk about the other risks in the room (business, legal). Not because they are more important, but because they are often unspoken but still carry enormous influence on decision-making. Business and legal risks aren’t just about the direct costs. It comes down to far more than that, and as with a brand-building exercise, the details of these decisions significantly impact on the company, its brand, the reputation, the price point, etc.  

Food safety risk and the business and legal ramifications cut through all layers of an organization, erasing the history of compliance that once stood there. Warren Buffett famously said, “It takes 20 years to build a reputation, and five minutes to ruin it.” 

Good questions to discuss are: 

  • What are the risks and costs of losing customer/consumer confidence?  
  • What’s the risk of civil litigation and liability (with and without an outbreak)?  
  • What are the costs of a recall?  
  • What damage is done, and for how long, when consumers associate your product as one they shouldn’t buy?  

So, when considering whether to invest in a new hygienic piece of equipment, drain or real-time monitoring of antimicrobial injection…really consider what it costs not to.  

Don’t gloss over the statistical design and value of a testing program when evaluating your testing budget. Not all approaches are the same and certainly don’t offer the same levels of protection/assurance. A test is never just a test, and the value of a testing program is critically dependent on the assumptions by which they were designed, the methods used and the overall process in which the sample was collected. 

The take home point is that food safety doesn’t need to stop (and shouldn’t) at the “are we compliant” phase. I never liked the C grade in school, and neither should you. Want the ‘A’? Design the budget and process to give it to you.  

Building resiliency and confidence in risk management in your food safety program is not out of reach. It starts first by designing the budget that supports the company and reputation you mean to build. WG Science works with our members to learn and support you on how to optimize your program, leaning into new approaches for food safety data and collection system. Data is easy to collect for compliance, but using data to drive comprehensive food safety control and risk reduction takes a special sort of focus.   

WG data efforts aren’t just a program – they are a piece of a broader initiative to redefine what food safety control looks like across our food supply. We focus on driving enhanced value, efficiency and efficacy. Food safety doesn’t have to be just a cost-center, it’s a critical piece of a broader long-term strategy for your company. Join us. 

EPA and HHS Announce Coordinated Action on Microplastics

April 7th, 2026

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently announced a series of coordinated actions to better understand and address microplastics, with a particular focus on drinking water and potential human health impacts. 

The initiative includes expanded federal research, efforts to improve detection and measurement methods, and early steps that could help inform how microplastics are evaluated in the future. While these actions do not introduce new regulatory requirements, they signal that microplastics are emerging as a priority area for federal agencies. 

For the produce industry, this is a development worth monitoring, and we will keep you updated. Microplastics are increasingly part of broader conversations around water quality, environmental monitoring, sustainability, and public health. As science evolves, there may be greater attention on how microplastics are measured in environmental systems and what role they could play in future policy or stakeholder expectations. 

At this stage, the announcement is focused on building knowledge and advancing research, but it reflects a broader shift: microplastics are moving from an emerging topic toward a more established area of environmental and public health interest.  

For those interested in learning more, several organizations have published useful information and research on microplastics, including their presence in the environment, potential health implications, and ongoing efforts to improve detection and understanding. 

Useful related information include: 

Beyond Foodborne Transmission: First Outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 REP Strain in Recreational Water

April 7th, 2026

peer-reviewed article published in March 2026, in the Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides an overview of the first reported outbreak of persistent Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain REPEXH01 associated with untreated recreational water. The publication is authored by scientists from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), the Nevada County Public Health Department (NCPHD) and the Nevada County Environmental Health Department (NCEHD).  

The publication delves into a 2017 investigation of a STEC outbreak involving 18 patients, mostly children. Of these, 11 were confirmed by laboratory tests, 10 were hospitalized and 5 developed hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Outbreak questionnaires from the CDPH identified untreated recreational water in a northern California lake during a birthday party as the common exposure among 16 of the 18 patients; the remaining 2 were in close household contact with lab-confirmed patients.  

The CDPH, in collaboration with the CDC, conducted environmental investigations at the lake in August 2017. The investigations included a characterization of the surrounding land, wildlife observations and the collection of environmental samples. Microbial analyses of water and sediment samples included quantification of generic E. coli and coliforms, microbial source-tracking analysis (e.g., human Bacteroides and mitochondrial DNA from geese and deer) and isolation and subtyping of STEC O157. Additionally, goose and deer scat were collected when available. 

A year later, after a water sample tested positive for STEC O157:H7, a follow-up environmental assessment was conducted to determine whether the outbreak strain remained present and to identify potential environmental reservoirs. For this follow-up, additional sample sites and MST markers were collected, including creeks (e.g., upstream and outlet) and MST markers (e.g., ruminant and bovine). STEC isolates from both environmental assessments were subjected to Whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The initial environmental assessment in 2017, with a follow-up in 2018, highlighted the key findings outlined below. 

  • Generic E. coli exceeded the US recreational water quality criteria statistical threshold value (410 MPN/100 mL), reaching 861 MPN/100 mL in 2017, and ranging from 770 to over 2420 MPN/100 mL in 2018 samples. 
  • Water samples from 2017 taken from two collection sites, Beach A and Beach B, showed that only Beach B had STEC O157 detected, along with positive goose MST markers and negative human and deer MST markers. Similar findings were reported for sediment samples. Interestingly, even though water samples from Beach A were negative, sediments from Beach A tested positive for STEC O157. 
  • In the 2018 follow-up assessment, the goose marker was only found at beach B, which also had the highest fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) levels. Human and ruminant MST markers were detected only in the water from the creek outlet, where FIB levels were also high. However, no bovine-specific marker was identified. 
  • STEC O157 was isolated in 2017 from sediment and water samples. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns matched STEC O157 isolated from patients and from goose scat. WGS of the different samples were positive for H7 and carried the shiga toxin gene stx2a, the intimin gene (eae), and the enterohemolysin gene (ehxA). The isolates were also resistant to various antimicrobial compounds, including, but not limited to, phenicols, sulfonamides and quaternary ammonium compounds. 
  • Positive STEC O157 isolates from the 2018 investigation were unique in the PulseNet database and unrelated to the 2017 lake outbreak strain. Although virulence markers, including eae and ehxA, were identified, the isolates did not exhibit antimicrobial resistance markers.  

After the outbreak, local authorities’ public health response involved issuing a no-swim advisory and conducting weekly beach water quality tests, which led to the closure of all swimming beaches around the lake. Conversely, after co-detection of ruminant and human MST markers, along with STEC O157, in a single sampled creek, it was determined that parcels along the creek were used for grazing, with cattle having unrestricted access to the creek banks and water. However, no further MST investigation was conducted. Instead, a non-lethal deterrence method was implemented after the organization obtained a federal permit, resulting in the culling of 69 resident Canada geese. Later in 2019, the organization reported a reduction in E. coli levels in the beach water, which they attributed to efforts to control the geese population.  

The authors suggest that, although the outbreak strain was recovered from most geese samples during the two environmental assessments, it was unclear whether the geese were the STEC source or had been colonized by STEC after being introduced to the lake environment by another source. The authors further explain that the 2018 finding suggests that cattle could have repeatedly introduced STEC into the environment, and that the geese may have acquired the pathogen and spread it in the water body. 

Since the 2017 STEC lake-related outbreak, 9 additional outbreaks have involved the same O157:H7 strain. Including the largest romaine lettuce outbreak of 2018, where the pathogen was isolated from canal water adjacent to lettuce fields and a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO). 

Why this matters: 

  • Although past outbreaks of E. coli O157:H7 linked to recreational water have been documented, this is the first outbreak associated with the REP strain. Identifying this strain helped recognize it in foodborne outbreaks that happened in later years. 
  • This investigation highlights the importance of monitoring environmental waters and recognizing that ecological systems are dynamic.  As highlighted in the publication, adjacent land and wildlife patterns (e.g., bird migration) influence how pathogens emerge and spread in the environment. 
  • The use of microbial source tracking in environmental samples can be particularly valuable in complex systems, where isolating foodborne pathogens is challenging, as it helps narrow down potential sources rather than searching for a needle in a haystack. 

 

CFLCA Now Accepting 2026 Scholarship Applications

April 7th, 2026

The California Farm Labor Contractor Association (CFLCA) is now accepting applications for its 2026 scholarship program, supporting farmworkers and their families in pursuing higher education.

The Gabriel Gomez-Sandoval Farmworker Memorial Scholarship provides financial assistance to students who are farmworkers or the children of farmworkers employed by a California farm labor contractor (FLC) within the last 12 months. Scholarships range from $1,000 to $5,000. Applications are due by 11:59 p.m. PST on June 14, 2026.

Students interested in applying are encouraged to review all eligibility requirements and submit their applications here.

Puede encontrar información en español aquí.

CDFA Releases Climate Resilience Strategy for California Agriculture

April 7th, 2026

The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) announces the release of the Climate Resilience Strategy for California Agriculture (Strategy). The document provides a comprehensive overview of state actions designed to help the agricultural community prepare for, respond to, and thrive under the many conditions imposed by climate change, from uncertainty about water supply and drought to extreme weather events, wildfires, flooding and more.

“The Strategy celebrates the importance of what agriculture does for California every day and also acknowledges the tremendous challenges that California agriculture is facing today,” said CDFA Secretary Karen Ross. “This Strategy focuses on how we bring together all that we’ve learned about climate smart agriculture and the ability for agriculture to be a part of the climate solution.”

California farmers and ranchers are facing an increasingly difficult landscape, including climate change effects as well as perennial challenges like the cost of inputs and other economic uncertainties. The state is dedicated to supporting our agricultural industry and food systems, and the Climate Resilience Strategy for California Agriculture is a key step in ensuring that the state is fostering resilience in the agricultural sector.

Californians might be most aware of climate impacts on agriculture like the historic drought of 2020-2023 that led to the fallowing of over 750,000 acres and estimated economic losses of $3 billion. But other effects critical to agriculture are also compounded by our changing climate: extreme weather events such as flooding, freezes and heat waves can spell disaster for crops and livestock across the state; and wildfires – whether in urban regions like Los Angeles or rural areas like California’s valleys and foothills – can imperil farms outright, while the smoke and wind can pose a threat to workers and even damage crops, as it did with grapes in Wine Country in 2020. Less obvious but still impactful are climate-driven increases in pest pressure that cost growers and the state millions to combat.

The sheer scale of California agriculture means there’s a lot at risk – but it also means this sector can meaningfully contribute to curbing climate change. The Strategy builds upon California’s Ag Vision 2030, which prioritizes “fostering climate smart, resilient, and regenerative food systems” that can help mitigate climate change, improve soil health, restore biodiversity, enhance ecosystems, and contribute to human health.

This strategy highlights climate-related agricultural challenges, policies, and actions across State government; lays out areas of opportunity for further action; explores connections with local, statewide, federal, and private-sector initiatives; and provides Equity Principles that help state agencies ensure that their programs are accessible to California farmers.

It includes important context, strategies and actions, and implementation plans to support California farmers, ranchers, farmworkers, and agricultural communities and ensure California agriculture thrives in the faces of climate change and is an integral part of the solution.

The Strategy is organized under three pillars:

  • Support a Thriving and Resilient Food Sector
  • Protect Natural Systems Critical to Agriculture
  • Encourage Resilient Agriculture Practices

Each pillar has Key Objectives representing a unique aspect in the agricultural system, such as animal health, pest management, or supporting agricultural workforce. These Key Objective have associated strategies and actions that align under one or more of the four overarching goals:

  • Provide Health and Environmental Benefits
  • Improve the Bottom Line for Farmers
  • Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
  • Support Economic Development

The Strategy was developed with input from farmers and ranchers, nonprofits, technical experts, state agencies, and more to ensure that the key objectives, goals, strategies, and actions reflect stakeholder input and needs.

Click here to learn more about the Strategy.

###

CDFA’s Mission: To safeguard a resilient food system and promote an equitable marketplace, cultivating a California grown food supply that is globally recognized for innovation, quality and sustainability.

Industry Leaders to Tackle Rising Produce Fraud in 2026 Forecast Webinar

April 3rd, 2026

As fraud grows more sophisticated across the fresh produce supply chain, industry leaders are coming together to help businesses stay one step ahead.

On April 21, 2026, experts from Blue Book Services, the Dispute Resolution Corporation (DRC), the Texas International Produce Association (TIPA) and Western Growers will host the 2026 Produce Fraud Forecast Webinar. The webinar will be a timely discussion focused on emerging threats and practical strategies to protect buyers, sellers and shippers across North America.

Recent data shows a concerning shift in fraud activity, with new and increasingly complex schemes targeting multiple points in the supply chain. From payment fraud to identity misrepresentation, these evolving tactics are putting financial and operational pressure on produce companies of all sizes.

The webinar will feature an all-start panel of industry experts, including Kirk Soule of Blue Book Services, Jaime Bustamante of the DRC, Dante Galeazzi of TIPA and Bryan Nickerson of Western Growers. The webinar is free to attend and open to all interested participants.

Event Details

When: April 21, 2026
Time: 10 a.m. PST/1 p.m. EST
Format: Virtual/Webinar

Register here: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Ld5MPJWiR7mzHEoNBQKBtw#/registration

Arbitration Agreements: Small Details Can Make a Big Difference

April 2nd, 2026

A recent California Court of Appeal decision upheld an employer’s arbitration agreement, sending the employee’s individual claims to arbitration and dismissing the class claims. Important for employers is the court’s clear message that small drafting details can make a big difference in whether an arbitration agreement holds up to court scrutiny. 

In the case Tuufuli v. West Coast Dental Administrative Services (Tuufuli), a former employee filed suit against the employer, asserting both individual and class claims under various California labor and business laws. The employer moved to compel arbitration, seeking to enforce an agreement in which both parties expressly agreed that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) would govern. The FAA is a federal law governing the enforceability of arbitration agreements and providing a framework for resolving disputes outside the courtroom. The FAA generally applies to contracts involving interstate commerce. 

The lower court compelled arbitration of the employee’s individual claims but dismissed the class claims based on the agreement’s express ban on class, collective, or representative proceedings. In affirming the lower court’s ruling, the Court of Appeal emphasized several key points: 

  • The FAA governed the arbitration agreement because it was “expressly agreed” to by both parties. This confirmed existing federal and California precedent that contracting parties may voluntarily agree to the application of the FAA and that evidence of interstate commerce is not the sole consideration for determining whether FAA coverage applies.  
  • The dismissal of the class claims was warranted because the agreement was unambiguous in its prohibition of class, collective, or representative proceedings.  
  • Evidence of substantial interstate activity is not necessary where the parties contractually agree that the FAA governs.  

The Tuufuli case highlights how important it is for employers to examine current arbitration agreements, making sure they meet both state and federal legal requirements to enhance their effectiveness as a risk management strategy.

Best Practices: Don’t Let Leave Policies Create Liability

April 2nd, 2026

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed a lawsuit alleging a Florida poker room has violated the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) by refusing to provide reasonable accommodations to pregnant workers. 

According to the EEOC, BestBet, Florida’s largest poker room, maintained a strict policy requiring employees to resign if they missed two weeks or more of work and did not otherwise qualify for leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act. When one woman with a high-risk pregnancy requested to miss six shifts over a two-and-a-half-week period in January 2025, on the advice of her doctor, BestBet forced her to quit. BestBet forced another employee to leave the company in February 2025 after she requested leave to have her baby. 

The PWFA is a federal law that requires employers to reasonably accommodate employees’ and applicants’ known limitations related to pregnancy and childbirth, absent undue hardship, including accommodations that require modifying the employer’s application of leave-limiting policies. 

For California employers, it’s also important to remember that state law provides overlapping—and, in some areas, broader—protections for pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. Depending on the circumstances, an employee may be entitled to reasonable accommodations and job-protected leave under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and Pregnancy Disability Leave (PDL), in addition to other leave rights that may apply. Employers should always evaluate requests on a case-by-case basis and avoid rigid “no-fault” attendance or maximum-leave policies that cut off consideration of required accommodations. 

Key takeaways for employers: 

  • Train managers and HR to recognize pregnancy-related limitations and promptly engage in the interactive process (and document it) before making decisions that could negatively affect an employee’s terms and conditions of employment. 
  • Review attendance and leave policies—removing references to “must be 100% healed” and adjusting maximum-leave provisions—to confirm they allow legally required exceptions and do not compel employees to resign. 
  • Coordinate federal and California obligations (e.g., PWFA, FEHA/PDL and other applicable leave laws) and apply the most protective rule when multiple laws cover the same situation. 

USDA Reopens Acreage Reporting Period for Specialty Crop Farmers Impacted by Unfair Market Disruptions 

April 2nd, 2026

Specialty Crops Acreage Reporting Deadline for 2025 is Now April 24

Washington, D.C., March 31, 2026 – The USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA) today announced the agency is reopening the 2025 crop acreage reporting period required for specialty crop producers who want to apply for the Assistance for Specialty Crop Farmers (ASCF) program. Announced by U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins on Feb. 13, the ASCF program is designed to help address market disruptions, elevated input costs, persistent inflation, and market losses from foreign competitors engaging in unfair trade practices that impede exports. Specialty crop producers now have until April 24, 2026, to report 2025 acres to FSA.

“After full consideration of requests from specialty crop producers, industry leaders and members of Congress, Secretary Rollins made a responsive, Farmers First decision to reopen the acreage reporting period for the Assistance for Specialty Crop Farmers program,” said FSA Administrator Bill Beam. “We’re committed to doing what it takes to keep specialty crop producers economically viable and gathering accurate acreage reporting data is critical to making sound FSA program policy decisions. Reopening the reporting period ensures that every eligible producer has a fair opportunity to participate and that we deliver assistance where it’s needed most.”

The ASCF program is authorized under the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act.

Eligible Specialty Crops

ASCF-eligible specialty crops include: (A) Almond, Apple, Apricot, Aronia berry, Artichoke, Asparagus, Avocado(B) Banana, Bean (Snap or green; Lima; Dry edible), Beet (Table), Blackberry, Blueberry, Breadfruit, Broccoli (including Broccoli Raab), Brussels Sprouts(C)Cabbage (including Chinese), Cacao, Carrot, Cashew, Cauliflower, Celeriac, Celery, Cherimoya, Cherry, Chestnut (for Nuts), Chive, Citrus, Coconut, Coffee, Collards (including Kale), Cranberry, Cucumber, Currant(D) Date, (E)  Eggplant, Endive(F) Feijou, Fig, Filbert (Hazelnut)(G)Garlic, Gooseberry, Grape (including Raisin), Guava (H) Horseradish(K) Kiwi, Kohlrabi(L)Leek, Lettuce, Litchi(M) Macadamia, Mango, Melon (All Types), Mushroom (Cultivated), Mustard and Other Greens (N) Nectarine (O) Okra, Olive, Onion,  (P)Papaya, Parsley, Parsnip, Passion Fruit, Pea (Garden; English or Edible Pod; Dry edible), Peach, Pear, Pecan, Pepper, Persimmon, Pineapple, Pistachio, Plum (including Prune), Pomegranate, Potato, Pumpkin (Q) Quince(R) Radish (All Types), Raspberry, Rhubarb, Rutabaga (S) Salsify, Spinach, Squash (Summer and Winter), Strawberry, Suriname Cherry, Sweet Corn, Sweet Potato, Swiss Chard(T)Taro, Tomato (including Tomatillo), Turnip(W) Walnut, Watermelon

*Dry edible beans and peas covered by the Farmer Bridge Assistance program will not be eligible for ASCF. Commodities covered by FBA will not be eligible for ASCF.

Program Participation

ASCF payments are based on reported 2025 planted acres. Eligible farmers should ensure their 2025 acreage reporting is factual and accurate by Friday, April 24, 2026. USDA will release commodity-specific payment rates soon after the acreage reporting deadline.

Following completion of acreage reporting, producers are encouraged to prepare for the eventual announcement of the ASCF program application period by creating a Login.gov account. Doing so ensures that once FSA starts taking ASCF program applications, those producers who wish to apply online will experience an expedited application and payment process. Assistance will also be available through local FSA county offices.

Login.gov is the public’s one account for government engagement. Producers can use one account and password for secure, private access to participating government agencies, including FSA. Begin the Login.gov process by visiting fsa.usda.gov/fba to create a Login.gov account. Producers who have an existing Login.gov account can work with FSA using their existing account. For assistance creating a login.gov account, visit https://login.gov/help/.

Crop insurance linkage will not be required for the ASCF program. However, USDA strongly urges producers to take advantage of the new One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) risk management tools to best protect against price risk and volatility in the future.

More information on ASCF is available online at www.fsa.usda.gov/fba. Producers can contact their local FSA county office to make an appointment to complete their 2025 crop acreage report.

###

 

California Gubernatorial Candidates Discuss Affordability and Rural Issues at Fresno Forum

April 2nd, 2026

An estimated 525 attendees gathered at Fresno State University for the California Gubernatorial Candidate Forum, “Affordability and Rural California,” for a wide-ranging discussion that highlighted the economic pressures facing the state’s rural communities and agricultural industry.

Hosted at the Ruiz Event Space in the Lynda and Stewart Resnick Student Union, the event brought together six leading candidates—Xavier Becerra, Chad Bianco, Steve Hilton, Matt Mahan, Katie Porter and Antonio Villaraigosa—for a conversation centered on affordability, agriculture, water and energy policy. The Forum was moderated by Kristin Olsen-Cate, Partner at California Strategies & Advocacy, and Fresno County Supervisor Buddy Mendes.

A Unifying Issue: California is Too Expensive

Despite their ideological differences, the candidates aligned on one central issue: California’s cost of living has reached unsustainable levels. From housing and energy to groceries and healthcare, each candidate acknowledged that affordability is placing increasing strain on both families and the agricultural sector.

But, they disagreed on how to address it.

Republican candidates Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton pointed to taxes and regulation as the primary drivers, calling for broad rollbacks. Bianco pledged sweeping regulatory reductions, while Hilton proposed lowering vehicle fees, expanding in-state energy production and reducing the size of government.

Democratic candidates, while acknowledging regulatory burdens, emphasized more targeted reforms. Katie Porter and Matt Mahan highlighted housing as the largest cost pressure, with Porter proposing tax relief for lower-income earners and Mahan advocating for comprehensive environmental review reform to accelerate development.

Antonio Villaraigosa and Xavier Becerra framed affordability as a broader, systemic challenge requiring coordinated policy changes across multiple sectors.

Agriculture at the Center of the Debate

Given the Central Valley setting, agriculture remained a focal point throughout the forum. Candidates repeatedly noted that California has lost tens of thousands of farms over the past few decades, raising concerns about the long-term viability of the state’s agricultural economy. There was broad agreement that regulatory costs have increased dramatically (some estimates more than tenfold over the past 20 years), placing significant strain on growers.

Porter emphasized the economic reality confronting growers: “Farmers are not leaving agriculture by choice… they’re losing their farms financially.”

Villaraigosa pointed to the rising cost burden: “We’ve gone from $160 an acre in regulatory costs to $1,600… that’s not sustainable.”

Bianco argued current policies are actively undermining the sector: “Everything being put in place is to make sure that farming doesn’t exist in the future in California.”

Hilton framed the issue as a policy failure: “The assault on this industry has to stop.”

Mahan focused on regulatory impact: “We have increased the cost of complying with regulations on farms by 13 times in just 20 years.”

Xavier Becerra called for a more targeted approach to oversight: “Let’s start to shave away all the other regs that have nothing to do with safety and production.”

Energy Costs and Climate Policy Tensions

Energy emerged as another major point of contention, with candidates debating the balance between climate goals and affordability. All candidates agreed that energy costs are too high, but they disagreed on why. The Republican candidates blamed climate policies and restrictions on fossil fuel production, while the Democratic candidates pointed to a need for better planning and investment in infrastructure.

Mahan and Villaraigosa advocated for a more “all-of-the-above” energy strategy, including maintaining existing energy sources while transitioning to cleaner alternatives. Porter emphasized the need to expand renewable energy and storage capacity, noting that demand is expected to rise sharply in the coming years.

Notably, when asked whether California needs to rethink the balance between climate mandates and affordability, every candidate raised their hand in agreement, underscoring a rare moment of consensus.

United on Water but Split on Strategy

Water policy, one of the most critical issues for the Central Valley, generated both agreement and debate. Candidates widely supported expanding water storage, improving conveyance systems and investing in infrastructure. However, disagreements emerged over specific projects and regulatory frameworks.

Republican candidates pushed for large-scale reservoir construction and fewer environmental restrictions, while Democratic candidates emphasized a mix of solutions, including groundwater management, recycling and conservation.

The state’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) drew mixed reactions. Some candidates called for major reforms or repeal, while others defended its intent but criticized its implementation as overly complex and burdensome. Across the board, candidates stressed the need for more predictable water supplies to support long-term agricultural investment.

Candidates Split on Role of Government

Beyond specific policies, the forum revealed a deeper divide over how California is governed. Several candidates criticized the growing power of regulatory agencies, arguing that unelected bodies wield too much influence over industries like agriculture. Porter and Villaraigosa called for stronger legislative oversight, while Hilton and Bianco advocated for dramatically shrinking the regulatory state. Mahan framed the issue as one of accountability, emphasizing the need to measure outcomes rather than simply adding new rules.

The Road Ahead in the Gubernatorial Race

While the candidates disagreed on solutions, the forum made clear that affordability and the future of rural California will be central issues in the gubernatorial race. From housing and energy to water and agriculture, the challenges discussed in Fresno reflect broader tensions across the state: how to balance economic growth, environmental priorities and the cost of living for everyday Californians.

As moderator Kristin Olsen noted in her opening remarks, the question facing voters is ultimately simple: What can the next governor do to make California more affordable while sustaining the industries and communities that keep it running?

Did you miss the live stream?

You can watch the forum in its entirety on YouTube here.

_____

A special thanks to the 30-plus agriculture industry associations and the Maddy Institute for joining together to sponsor this event:

Almond Alliance

Ag Association Management Services Inc.

Agricultural Council of California

California Agricultural Irrigation Association

California Alfalfa and Forage Association

California Apple Commission

California Association of Wheat Growers

California Association of Winegrape Growers

California Blueberry Commission

California Cherry Growers and Industry Association

California Citrus Mutual

California Cotton Ginners and Growers Association

California Farm Bureau

California Fresh Fruit Association

California Grain and Feed Association

California Pear Growers Association

California Poultry Federation

California Seed Association

California State Beekeepers Association

California State Floral Association

California Sweet Potato Council

California Tomato Growers Association

California Walnut Board

California Warehouse Association

California Wild Rice Advisory Board

The Maddy Institute

Olive Growers Council of California

Olive Oil Commission of California

Pacific Coast Renderers Association

Walnut Alliance

Western Growers

Western Tree Nut Association

Moving at the Speed of Growers: Why Partnerships Matter in AgTech

April 15th, 2026

One of my favorite parts of my role in AgTech on the WG Innovation Team is seeing what’s possible when the right partners come together with a shared purpose: helping growers succeed. Innovation in agriculture doesn’t happen in isolation, and it certainly doesn’t help anyone if solutions stay stuck on the shelf. What truly makes the difference is the ability to move quickly, act collaboratively, and build on the trust that already exists between growers and industry partners.

That’s why partnerships with people like Jason Mellow and the team at Axis Ag have been so impactful. In AgTech, speed matters, but only when it’s paired with credibility and a deep understanding of grower realities. Axis Ag embodies that balance. They have established trust with growers by listening first, showing up consistently, and following through. When they introduce something new, growers pay attention, because it comes from a place of partnership rather than salesmanship.

A recent experience around Diamondback moth management really brought this home for me. As many California brassica growers are already struggling with Diamondback moth pressure, growers are looking for better tools, better coverage, and smarter ways to use registered chemistries, especially when resistance and application efficiency are top-of-mind concerns.

I picked up the phone and called Jason to brainstorm. There was no long proposal process or extended back-and-forth. Instead, we had a straightforward conversation focused on one question: How can we practically help growers evaluate a potential solution in real field conditions, as fast as possible?

Within five days—five—Jason and Axis Ag had an “On Target” electrostatic spraying system mounted on a tractor and headed to a grower’s field. Not a demo plot tucked away somewhere, but a real commercial field, working alongside a grower who wanted to see for himself whether this technology could fit into his operation.

The initial trial was done with water, intentionally. The goal wasn’t to make claims or push products; it was to understand coverage, drift potential, and overall performance under that grower’s specific conditions. Standing there in the field, watching the system operate, having open dialogue with the grower about what he was seeing and what questions he still had—that’s what meaningful evaluation looks like.

Because of that rapid, low-risk trial, the grower could confidently decide whether he wanted to move forward and try the On Target system with registered pesticides in his own brassica fields. No pressure. Just data, observation, and trust. That kind of approach empowers growers, rather than overwhelming them.

To me, this is what effective commercialization should look like. It’s not about pushing technology, it’s about pulling innovation into the field, guided by real needs and real timelines. Partners like Jason and Axis Ag understand that growers don’t have the luxury of waiting multiple seasons to see if something might work. When a pest like Diamondback moth shows up, solutions need to move just as fast.

This experience reinforced why I value commercialization partners who are agile, respected, and deeply connected to the growers they serve. The ability to mobilize quickly, get equipment in the field, and generate firsthand experience is invaluable. It shortens the gap between innovation and impact—and ultimately helps growers make informed decisions that protect their crops and their bottom line.

In AgTech, trust opens the door, speed gets you through it, and collaboration keeps you moving forward. When all three come together, real progress happens.

Tulare 2026 Discussion with Paul Mikesell: The Real Numbers Driving Ag Automation Forward

April 15th, 2026

I put up a post a few weeks back with my thoughts on the state of play for ag and AgTech shows, including Tulare World Ag Expo and San Francisco World Agri-Tech. I wanted to revisit Tulare for one more post, this time about a podcast I recorded with Paul Mikesell, the Founder and CEO of Carbon Robotics (you can watch the podcast here). Paul and I have had a couple of recorded sessions. I have thoroughly enjoyed them. Paul is a great founder and has done a tremendous job of leading Carbon Robotics from day zero through to their status today as the leading laser weeding robot startup, and in many ways, the leading weeding robot startup for specialty crops.

One of the things that came out of the podcast was Paul sharing that Carbon Robotics had sales of over $100 million in 2025. This is a huge milestone for any startup, even more huge in a hardware category that involves extensive R&D efforts and a solid go-to market strategy with support and economics that work for growers. A lot of my followers and friends ask why Carbon Robotics gets so much attention from me. That answer is simple – they are the alpha dog of specialty crop automation software at the moment and likely for the next several moments. They deserve an outsized amount of attention from everyone in and around the automation space because of their results.

First, the ability to actually conjure up a laser weeder and then get it built, commercialized, and scaled with multiple models over several years is a great accomplishment. Second, their ability to fundraise in an increasingly challenging environment where VC has dropped 70% in five years has helped them continue to scale (they’ve raised well over $150M, including a $70M D round). In addition, Paul’s CEO track record (including a $2.5 billion exit to EMC in 2010 and another exit from Clustrix) helped him secure capital from non-AgriFoodTech investors, including Nvidia and BOND (and Nvidia has a board seat). These kinds of investments are great because they bring investment dollars from outside AgriFoodTech into the segment. It takes a CEO with that kind of track record to attract those kinds of dollars into the space.

Third, they have built the go-to market model to multiple continents and several companies. This is a huge lift in AgTech. They have also expanded from specialty crops with the G2 200, 400, and 600 models to Midwest crops with the 1200 and 1800 with their 2025 rollout at Tulare. They have developed a laser weeder add-on for the Farm-NG Amiga that was shown at Tulare. They have also developed Carbon ATK (Autonomous Tractor Kit) to support autonomous tractors. The combined product suite adds to the total addressable market Carbon Robotics can reach.

The $100 million revenue number for 2025 is a big milestone. I appreciate Paul being willing to share that number. To other automation startups, if you are growing revenue and are comfortable sharing the number, please reach out and help us dial in the revenue estimates for the segment. At the moment, Ben Palone and I are comfortable (based on the feedback we get from actual startups who are in market and commercializing) that a good estimate for 2025 automation sales for specialty crops was $310 million. This represents 20-25% growth over 2024. That is a solid growth rate for a space with multiple startups growing revenue. It also means we are on pace to become a $1 billion category by 2030, which creates significant complementary opportunities, including systems integration and data/analytics.

So those are two big numbers from an ecosystem perspective. We have overall revenue of $310 million at a solid growth rate. We also have a $100 million player poised to continue their growth. Selfishly, I would like to see the percentage of category revenue for Carbon Robotics shrink some because right now the category is a little reliant on one large player. But I am also fine with Carbon Robotics continuing an aggressive growth trajectory because there are mid-stage startups that are starting to grow revenue that will add to the overall category growth. I’ll have more to say about them in future articles. For now, the headlines are $310M and $100M+ and both are signs of a category that is solving real problems and working hard to scale to a $1B category the next five years.